Thread: I need some clarification, why are men portrayed badly, our issues ignored in media?

OK, to summarize some of it (gross generalizations follow...)

• Feminists - promote misandry in various flavours on the belief it is 'deserved' (justified) for alleged oppression of women by men (e.g. holding a door open for them, offering to walk on the outside of a path so if a car goes by he gets wet while she is sheltered). The children who grow up abusive and socially awkward are simply "collateral damage" from the feminist perspective.

• Politicians - attack men partly because they know we are considerably more tolerant of abuses than women, we're an easy target. Also, politicians are genuinely scared of feminist groups ganging up against them and lobbying for them to be sacked. In conjunction with feminist agenda-driven "research", men can be shamed into silence using junk-science claims with far more ease than feminists can be silenced with even legitimate data (such as information on primary aggressors of child abusers/murderers=mothers).

• Media - also knows that men can take a joke at their own expense so don't mind portraying men as dumb. The same media groups mostly refuse to portray women negatively due to past experiences with feminist lobby-groups insisting that women must be respected but men can be abused (on screen).

• Society - in general doesn't meaningfully go out of it's way to promote misandry, but often the misandry being promoted by society isn't recognised as misandry. For example; media portrays violence against men as 'funny' or men as typically oafish compared to women, politicians give women additional rights over men & children in attempts to pacify the naggers not realising they're feeding a monster with an eternal hunger for victim-status, and feminists (who comprise of less than 1/3 of the total population) are the exception here. These are the ones with an organised agenda to bring men down and elevate women above men (and children). This is the group who goes beyond turning a blind eye to misandry & injustice (like 'society' in general tends to), instead these are those who actively research with the agenda to put all blame on men.

Hope that helped clarify some of it for you.

Quote from nickb275

I just wanted some input on this question, I have been here for a few weeks, and have discussed and posted some pertinent and less pertinent stuff. Yet I am still confused at society in large as to the reasons behind the negative portrayal of men and boys and societies seeming intended forced ignorance and malevolence towards the subject. Are we not screwing up our next generations? What is the goal behind it, and what is the expected outcome? Is the justice system and political apparatus so blind as to see this will greatly affect the future in regards to the family unit? Again, WHY? What is to gain? I have opinions as to these questions, but feel very ill informed as to the agenda behind it all!!

The petty tyrants(politicians) and the currency worshiping eliets fear social uprising. That is why they used feminism and racism to keep everyone fighting amongst themselves. They have to constantly demonize and emasculate men and boys to keep them from dethroning those in power. Hence the reason why the government and the media has green lighted women to lie, cheat, steal from men and kill their children. The state and feminists don't think it's necessary to hold women accountable for the roll they've played in screwing up society.

Yet I am still confused at society in large as to the reasons behind the negative portrayal of men and boys and societies seeming intended forced ignorance and malevolence towards the subject. Are we not screwing up our next generations?

Yes.

What is the goal behind it, and what is the expected outcome?

The goal is to screw up the next generation.

The expected outcome is a screwed up generation.

Is the justice system and political apparatus so blind as to see this will greatly affect the future in regards to the family unit?

Yes.

Again, WHY?

More money from the suckers.

What is to gain?

Even more money from the increasing number of screwed-up suckers.

@Percy. Ahh yes, KISS. Must remember my own mantra.

Quote from nickb275

I just wanted some input on this question, I have been here for a few weeks, and have discussed and posted some pertinent and less pertinent stuff. Yet I am still confused at society in large as to the reasons behind the negative portrayal of men and boys and societies seeming intended forced ignorance and malevolence towards the subject. Are we not screwing up our next generations? What is the goal behind it, and what is the expected outcome? Is the justice system and political apparatus so blind as to see this will greatly affect the future in regards to the family unit? Again, WHY? What is to gain? I have opinions as to these questions, but feel very ill informed as to the agenda behind it all!!

Western civilization was made by angry men; it will be unmade by angry men.

Quote from nickb275

... I am still confused at society in large as to the reasons behind the negative portrayal of men and boys and societies seeming intended forced ignorance and malevolence towards the subject. Are we not screwing up our next generations? What is the goal behind it, and what is the expected outcome? Is the justice system and political apparatus so blind as to see this will greatly affect the future in regards to the family unit? Again, WHY? What is to gain? ...
but feel very ill informed as to the agenda behind it all!!

Some will claim it is simply a series of 'isolated' phenomenon and 'natural' reactions to 'Male Privilege' and the like, and a mostly coincidental correction of social rongs...

I say that it is part of a Deliberate and Coordinated Pogrom of Separatist / Exterminationist Misandry (Hatred of Men, Masculinity and Normal Heterosexuality) - which can be summed up in the statement "Death to the Patriarchy" - and which is being marketed and sold under whatever label gets the poison in to the system fastest.

Ahhh - but you ask, what is the hated "Patriarchy" that it must Die the death of a thousand cuts and be buried under heaped upon slurs?

Well - it can be defined for what it is - or what it is not... Basically, the "Patriarchy" is what had until recently been seen as Normal Society, wherein Men and Women mostly took on different complementary roles related to family life and child rearing - in a mutually compatible manner consistent with the Inherent Gender Complimentary Nature of Heterosexual / Procreative Relations -
Also known as the rule by the 'Brutish Raping Testosterone Poisoned Pig Oppressor Patriarchy'.

What is is not is a Gynocentric Dyke-Topian ideal of a "World Devoid of Men" - or at least those Men who have normal heterosexual attraction to Women. Try reading the SCUM Manifesto cited on the home page at AM - where Dyke Icon Valerie Solanas lists the membership in the "Men's Auxiliary of SCUM" - which is to say those men who are "Relatively Inoffensive" and thus are the last to be gotten rid of as a final solution to the male problem.

And Yes - these Femi-Nazis do talk about "Solutions" to the Male Question - just like their predecessors in the National Homo-Socialist Third Reich (founded and led by Homo-Anal Coprophile / Ephebophiles) sought similar 'solutions' - and they are every bit as serious as their predecessors about finding a practical (eco-friendly - no greenhouse gas emissions) 'Final Solution'.

Indeed, there are already widespread discussions / books about the plan to reduce the Male Population to about 10% of its current level as a transition to a Pig Free world, kind of like an interim free range sperm bank leading to dyketopia, only different.

As for what is to gain - POWER to Feed their Misandrist Hatred is what it is really about, and REVENGE against the Patriarchy (even for those privileged girls with no personal stories of being oppressed, but were only vicariously / symbolically raped by the Pigs) to Feed their Misandrist Hatred...

And of course - Misandrist Hatred, as its own reward - and a way to divert attention from their own manifest shortcomings. Ahem.

Finally - as for the 'Consequences' - Like all true Zealots these Misandrists believe that retribution will only fall upon the Un-Good Ones, which does not include them - and that they will Arise from the ashes of the Patriarchy like the Phoenix in a 'Hermione the Witch Movie' (Harry Potter is a Pig long overdue for roasting) - Unscathed and In Charge.

The problem is that many people try and search for sense in such Misandrist Hatred, and it is no more to be found there than in other ideologies based on hatred - and in the end such Misandry only makes 'sense' to those who create and spread it for fun, power and profit - any ole way they can shove it up the public wazoo...

In the End - the Party Line is that it is all about Tolerance - because Tolerance Macht Frei

Ohso
"Not merely the validity of experience but the very existence of external reality was tacitly denied by their philosophy. The heresy of heresies was common sense. George Orwell 1984 On the Thought Police.

@dievas, not sure what you mean by your response. Are you saying men are angry for having made western civilization? Or we were angry when we made it, and our anger will be the fall of western civilization? Or something else entirely?

@Ohso, wow, while reading your post, my imagination jumped into fourth gear, or should I say fourth dimension. I was reminded of a vampire movie I saw awhile back called Blade trinity or some other. They had human storage facilities for stashing human blood in case of shortages. My mind went into overdrive at reading the "final solution/10%" and pictured males hung in sophisticated cryogenic apparel, induced into comatose state, with tubes inserted into our testicles. The ultimate sperm bank if you will. Just thought I would share my over imaginative head with you. I had a good laugh at myself.

Quote from nickb275

I had a good laugh at myself.

It will be even more laughable when the feminist drones spend themselves broke and kill each other because they've ran out of male scapegoats.

I used to think it was bad for men, the constant negative portrayal, but I changed my mind and then made this video, as I believe it makes women look bad, not men.