The feminist hatespeech/hypocrisy/stupidity/lies/pathetic/misinformation/etc. thread

[Feckless]

I'll bookmark it.



I'll be sure to ask if she responds.

And I'm uncertain where Lilium comes from. Probably some anime.

Aaaaaaaaaaaah its from an anime I know, Elfenlied. The theme song is called Lilium. An anime where there are a lot of evil men and a race of kold blooded girls who kill a whole lot of guys.

Hm I liked that series and never thought about the sexism in it. Well I´ll have to admit there is sexism in both ways. Oh there is a reason why people say the movie rating for this series is 30+

[frostyboy]

SexySmallTownFemme said:

So I checked with my supervisor here and she said that to her recollection, only 2% of sexual assaults are ever reported, and of those 2%, only 0.0001% are false accusations. Seems like the real problem is the reaction to people who report being victims, not men being falsely accused.

[Sophistry]

SexySmallTownFemme said:

What a silly bitch. If only 2% are reported than how do they know what 100% is? Or to put it another way, how do they know the figure for unreported rapes, since they are unreported, Or are they some stupid feminazi who assumes that 100% of women are raped.

[frostyboy]

A mangina named Tom Hulley said this:

I am worried that everyone is taking DNA testing as truth. It is a practice based on a theory. Even if the theory turns out to be almost accurate the practice can be flawed. Unfortunately, crime fiction has made people accept fingerprinting and now DNA testing as definite proof but the number of challenges and failures suggest caution.

It was a sad day when men were empowered (even more!) with a theory that gave them control as genetic fathers or denial otherwise.

Maybe all men should pay a paternity tax as most of them are quick to excuse those who squirm out of responsibilities.

Why should women be asked to name a supposed father? What if the night of conception was totally unmemorable for her? Are men to be made to declare who they have had sex with -when they arrive at work and clock in? (Going to be a lot of jealous hands)

Some idiot will be saying next that boys need male role models -don't they know that they are the problem not the solution behind wayward youth?

Women who have children need support -it is that simple. Patriarchy should pay -that's men, yes, all of us.

[Tyrael]

Shouldn't this be a sticky in the Feminist Misandry forum http://antimisandry.com/feminist-misandry/ ?

[Marx]

Shouldn't this be a sticky in the Feminist Misandry forum http://antimisandry.com/forumdisplay.php?f=29 ?

naw, cos that's news articles.

[6ame]

"So I checked with my supervisor here and she said that to her recollection, only 2% of sexual assaults are ever reported, and of those 2%, only 0.0001% are false accusations. Seems like the real problem is the reaction to people who report being victims, not men being falsely accused."

A few weeks back on the news, they were saying that only 15% of rapes are actually reported in the first place. This really annoys me, because it's impossible to know what goes unreported, but most women are gullible enough to just believe this shit, because "they said it on the news".

I think how they come up with this, is they compare facts with made-up statistics, so when it pans out that the FACTS don't match up with what feminists say, that 1 in 4 women are raped, they then assume that the 85% they need to make up the 1 in 4 stat must not be getting reported, rather than thinking that their 1 in 4 stat is completely false.
They can say what they want, but I'm unhappy about the way a feminist statistic is used on the news to suggest that the country is rife with rapists.

We could do the same thing here, why don't all of us, from now on, continually suggest that only 15% of women who murder their own babies then bury them are actually reported, and just see how feminists like a vicious rumour, based on a lie, spread about women that suggests that 85% of their most vile crimes are going unreported.

[Marx]

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/forums/s...7#post26306627

Webitt

Women are better than men.

Get over it.

ALso, flaxseed of the same forum accused me of being a rapist apologist, but that post has been deleted by the mod team, and she has been banned for a 2nd time in resposne to her on-going hate campaign against me.

[frostyboy]

Gonne said:

Perhaps men’s mindfuck lies in their entitlement to children.”I’m gonna have kids when I grow up” - if you don’t find somebody to incubate your precious seed, well the whole statement implies rape, really. Only girl children should ever think that thought.

Naturally speaking, women are in charge by default.You have a little human slide out of you, it’s ‘yours’. You feed it, teach it how to live (tell it what to do). But it seems men take that important biological fact, twist in their own importance in producing some dna for the child, and take it to mean that THEY ought to be doing all the ‘providing’, the living, the having fun whilst trying to keep all women in a perpetual state of pregnancy. Fucking MORONS.

And I bet they’re going to look to us to salve their little consciousness and solve their problem for them, if they ever feel like it. Well fuck that noise. YOU fix it, and I suggest you do it now before women really, REALLY crack and decide to wipe your sorry asses from this planet. With women being able connect all over the globe and with the increasingly hideous way men are abusing women, it just might happen.

[frostyboy]

Stormy said:

You have a son. It sounds extremely likely that, if in the future, your son rapes or is accused of rape, that you will automatically rally to his defence. How is this feminist? How is this anti-rape?

I am not saying your son will grow up to be a rapist. But in the current climate, statistically, a high probability.

[frostyboy]

CoolAunt said:

As for reverse discrimination of men, that is impossible, just as reverse discrimination of whites by blacks is impossible and for the same reason: those with little or no power can not discriminate against those who hold the most or all of the power. In other words, until women are as powerful as men and there is true equality between the sexes, however distrusting and unkind women’s behavior toward and speech about men, it causes men no harm as they remain in power and control. The oppressed should never feel obliged to be kind to their oppressors.

[frostyboy]

delphyne said:

“Feminism is about equality.”

Hi Dreamy, this is probably the source of the dispute right here. For most radical feminists feminism is about liberation from male oppression. If you keep your focus on equality you end up twisting yourself in knots trying to be “fair” to men, because if everybody has to be equal then men have to be equal too, right?

[frostyboy]

Luckynkl said:

We live in a rape culture. And sexual intercourse is a political institution under patriarchy. Of course all men are rapists. Each and every time they have sexual intercourse. Just because women have been conditioned to submit to it, or to like it, or choose to call it sex, doesn’t negate what it is.

In response, delphyne said:

I don’t think Lucky’s post was irritating or unhelpful. She’s saying the unsayable (well unsayable for women - men can describe sex in all those violative terms and get away with it). Do you think the taboo on calling all men rapists is because it isn’t true, or because men know it’s far too near the truth and so have to ensure that any woman who says it is silenced and worse?

I haven’t made up my mind but I’d much rather hear statements like Lucky’s (particularly when you see the response they engender which is always enlightening) than Dreamy’s injuctions about not hurting men’s feelings and calls for psychology to guide our struggle for liberation.

[frostyboy]

justicewalks said:

Oh, boy. Here we go again.

mAndrea is right that, while the presumption of a natural male inclination toward violent subjugation of females has indeed been used to justify women’s oppression, it can also easily be used to justify extreme efforts toward our freedom from them.

We could do this by refusing to be mothers to males. Even in places where abortions or other adequate birth control are lacking, women could refuse to nurse male neonates. You may wonder what horrible tragedies would befall the poor women who didn’t give men the sons they demanded. Might they be beaten? Might they be raped? Might they be killed?

Women are being beaten, raped, murdered, sold, and dehumanized right now, in torture porn and elsewhere. I’d rather die fighting as one of the last generation of women to suffer at the hands of men than to live a life of patriarchy-provided comfort, at the expense the generations of daughters to come.

Now, perhaps once male numbers were manageable enough, once we’d stopped allowing them an automatic and entitled suckle at the female teat, we could consider the possibility of educating the brutality out of them. In the meantime, it is ridiculous to think that after 6000 years of this shit, a people who comprise 49 percent of the population, hold 98 percent of the wealth, and possess a greater physical strength than us are just going to start treating us like humans out of the kindness of their hearts.

I’m not trying to get into it with the mothers of sons, but I refuse, on a supposedly radical feminist forum, to pretend as if it wouldn’t have been better for most males never to have been born. Whether you choose to comfort yourself by including your own Nigel Jr. in that near non-existent minority of men who do not actively benefit from the oppression of women is your own business, and it’s certainly not relevant to radical feminism.

Oh, and just to cut certain complaints off at the bud, I’m not attacking anyone, merely pointing out the fact that any feminist discussion of men, let alone a radical feminist discussion of them, is necessarily, at least theoretically, about all men, including the ones you love. If we can expect men to come here and not whine about how different they are from the men with whom we take issue, then surely we should be able to expect the same from the women here with regard to the men in their lives. The theoretical (and sometimes real) implication of all males, even loved ones, must be recognized. Even the most heinous of rapists, traffickers, and abusers have women in their lives who love them.

[frostyboy]

justicewalks said:

1. A few men have written me to ask how they can be exempt from my blanket condemnation of their sex as rapists. The answer is simple: Do not put your penis inside other people, ever.

Of course, rapists aren’t the only people who benefit from our current culture of rape glorification, though. Many celibate men also benefit from the status quo, since they compare themselves with the raping brutes in order to elevate the esteem of their own abstinence. They emphasize the will-power and self-control necessary to resist those rape urges and, in doing so, inextricably link their own “goodness” to the continued normalcy of rape (as well as reveal themselves to be rapists at heart, if not in deed). Such men are rape-beneficiaries, even if they themselves are not rapists. And I condemn such beneficiaries of the rape cultures as heartily as I do the men actually doing the raping. I will note that I have never met a celibate man who did not favorably compare himself to rapists and thereby derive his false sense of “decency” from the unfortunate current state of affairs.

So, in sum, if you don’t want to be a rapist in deed, don’t have sex (although, as I’ve said, whether or not a man is a rapist in deed has nothing whatsoever to do with whether or not he’s a rapist at heart). Ever. If, however, you don’t want to be a beneficiary of the rape cultures at all, then, may I humbly suggest suicide? I hear guns are most effective. Thanks.