Our feminised media

taype · #1 21st-April-2007

The more you observe the mainstream media, the more painfully obvious it becomes that it panders to feminism almost without fail. In my introductory post, I discussed the media, and itÂ’s seemingly never ending hostility towards men and all things male. Some time soon IÂ’m going to write in a more general sense about the bullshit that is pumped out by the media, and the effect this is likely having on society and the lives of young men who have to absorb this tripe.
However, whilst scouring through some blogs a few days ago, I came across the following article, which demonstrates perfectly what IÂ’m talking about. Â‘Feminist propagandaÂ’ would most aptly describe this piece, and as youÂ’ve likely guessed, it contains all the hallmarks of modern feminist journalism. Here it is:
Pow! Take that lowly man!
As youÂ’d probably expect from the title, it is yet another piece written with the sole intent of belittling men, offering nothing more than a one sided attack with a coinciding obligatory saturation of female oppression (which seems to be the standard these days). It begins:

Â“Is it a bird? Well, itÂ’s certainly not a bloke. Is it a plane? No, but itÂ’s turbo-charged. That multi-tasking, effortlessly able creature soaring miles ahead is a woman. WhatÂ’s she got that men havenÂ’t? SheÂ’s got the lot.Â”

With an introduction like that, you already know where this is headed. Cue the attack:

Â“So it goes on: hail Stef Penney, the first-time novelist who recently waltzed off with this yearÂ’s Costa (formerly Whit-bread) prize, beating established heavyweights such as Seamus Heaney and William Boyd. If it didnÂ’t sound so absurd, you could say that women are having a moment. They are the new master race.Â”

IÂ’ve skipped all the statistics, and got to the first Â‘interestingÂ’ point here. Â“Master RaceÂ”. Sounds bloody well Nazi to me, to be frank, though of course that doesnÂ’t stop such journalists trumpeting womenÂ’s new Â“superiorÂ” status. But donÂ’t get out the polished SS badges just yet because....

Â“The reason I put forward as to why, despite our clear genetic superiority, we are still paid less, promoted less and are physically abused more is because we allow it to happen. ItÂ’s our own fault.Â”

ThatÂ’s right folks. The new master race - the female Ãœbermensch if you will, is infact so powerful, so intelligent, so gobsmackingly great in every conceivable way that they are still being paid less. But arenÂ’t master races supposed to dominate, not be in a position of subordination? Well of course yes, but logic strangely seems to make itself absent whenever one of these feminist inspired articles hits the presses. Which is why the author has to rely on emotive language Â– in this case using the domestic violence card to get her Â“pointÂ” across. Remember the first rule of modern feminism: women are as hard and tough as you fucking like and just as capable as ANY man, but at the same time need to wear clothes made from bubble wrap, and have their homes padded with candy floss and marshmallows, because they are also delicate little creatures that require protection from men. Continuing...

Â“Not convinced? Ask Martin Amis Â— not a man previously lauded for his impeccable feminist credentials. Thanking Tina B r o w n recently for making him feel attractive at a time when he felt like a geek, he said: Â“To spell this out, I am not only a feminist, I am a gynocrat. That is to say, I believe in rule by chicks.Â”

Of course, no article like this would be complete without the token mangina chump, who willing submits himself to all things vaginal. These guys are so important to writing of this nature, because they are used to create the impression that men, all men, are in agreement with it. Naturally, cherry picked goons like him, who would literally scream if they heard a woman say Â“I believe in rule by guysÂ”, are the only men ever promoted by articles like this, except of course for the emasculated ones...

Â“My wife earns more than me,Â” said one last week. Â“I pretend to be pleased for her. But you know Â— inside, IÂ’m dying. SoÂ’s my career, while weÂ’re on the subject. Unlike hers . . .Â”
Â“The manÂ’s wife said: Â“Does it b o t h er him? I think so. And it bothers me, to be honest Â— I feel like IÂ’ve taken my big scary scissors and cut off his balls. He doesnÂ’t actually know exactly how much I earn Â— I lied about the figure and made it smaller. I donÂ’t want a divorce.Â”
Â“The battle is not quite won yet, obviously. But it is heading that way.Â”

And this is where the adversarial nature of feminist journalism rears its ugly head. Forget Â“equalityÂ”. ItÂ’s obvious that the author revels in the prospect of a gender war, and fully expects women to join this battle as well. Funny how male dominance is so often portrayed in the very same media outlets as the source of all societiesÂ’ ills, and yet domination of the female variety is championed by the very same people. These are also the people who claim to be against Â“dominationÂ” as a concept. Further, this is another great excuse to chuck in some misandry while attention is diverted, in this case the author simply couldnÂ’t resist including in a quick quip about castration.
The best bit comes at the end of the article, under the section Â“failing menÂ”. It consists of a list. Here are some of the Â‘highlightsÂ’:

The suicide rate for men is 3.7 times that for women. The rate for young males has shown a big increase in recent years

Average life expectancy in Britain is 77 for men and 81 for women

Could any male journalist publish an article in which he included a growing female suicide rate as a sign of male superiority, and expect to still have his job the next day? It just would not happen. Female genetic superiority? Just remember that the previous president of Harvard, Lawrence Summerswas forced to stand down, in part, because he dared to put forward the idea that differences between males and females may account for the disparity seen between the sexes in science and mathematics. Like so many self proclaimed Â‘caringÂ’ feminist women, this author has absolutely no qualms over joking about castration, male suicide and faltering boys. She probably doesnÂ’t realise that the reason male suicide is so high, and that it continues to grow, is because articles like this one continue to foster the idea that men and boys face an inexorable future of doom and gloom, and that no one, least of all this harpy gives a flying fuck.

Laugh this article off for the time being. Copy the text within the article and save it for future use, and do the same for any other blatantly misandric articles. This will one day prove invaluable, especially when some chump demands that you show them some proof that the media promotes misandry, or that it panders to feminist thinking.

Clovis Vitosha

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Feminised Manginas Abound..Say hello to Biden..	christianj	Australian Men's News	0	26th-August-2008 10:11 AM
Feminised Misandry Spreading Worldwide...	christianj	Australian Men's News	0	9th-August-2007 02:31 PM
Feminised Schools Destroy Boys	angryharry	Harry's Corner	0	22nd-February-2007 04:29 AM
Australia Land of the Feminised Manginas	Timocrat	Priority News	1	28th-December-2006 12:16 AM
Some feminised manginas	Tyrael	Chit chat (MAIN)	3	8th-December-2006 02:44 PM

Our feminised media

Our feminised media

Similar Threads