Caring women...
This is a discussion on Caring women... within the General Blog Chat forums, part of the Blogging Hub category; Firstly, sorry about the lack of posts recently, but you know how it goes. It should be blindingly obvious to ...
| |||||||
| ►Link to us◄ | Register | FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
          
1st-May-2007
| ||||
| ||||
Firstly, sorry about the lack of posts recently, but you know how it goes. It should be blindingly obvious to anyone with half a brain nowadays, that the only time differences between the sexes are promoted, let alone highlighted, is when it is believed that those differences will give women an inherent advantage in some way. Of course, most people would agree that there are key differences between men and women, but that’s all hushed up by the press, who only hint at this idea when they know it’ll please their female readership and temporarily appease the PC gods. Here is one of those all so familiar articles trumpeting the virtue of empathy, emoooshun and all things pink and flowery. The future is female, BT predicts "People will have to focus on being people, using their emotional skills," asserts Mr Pearson - with male confidence. And, he insists, women are instinctively good at this. “A scene of road repairs at Shepherds Bush in west London exemplifies this - steamrollers dominate the scene, not men with pick-axes or hand held shovels as would once have been the case.” Exemplifies what exactly? What he conveniently forgets to mention, is that it was most likely a MAN driving that very same steam roller. Further, it was most likely a MAN who transported that steam roller on the back of a truck. Which, in turn was probably maintained by a MAN, and so on and so forth. I can only imagine what this article would have been like if he had seen a woman on top of that steam roller.... “Machines are not a realistic substitute for child care, elderly care, nursing or other personal services, he says, questioning whether we would ever accept robots cutting our hair.” [read: questioning whether it could ever be possible to report the idea that robotics and economics might one day make women as socially redundant as this guy seems to believe men are becoming] “Computers with a "conscience" are already here says Mr Pearson. Iconic jobs, once thought impossible except by humans, have been already been replaced.” Well surely then matey, no matter how hard it might be to accept, it shouldn’t be too long before those caring assets you so proudly ascribe to women can simply be coded in to a machine? Ah yeah, BBC article, I remember now. "The future is female - and these changes are closer than many realize," says Mr Pearson. And I can guarantee that if this is indeed the case, there won’t be a male-friendly quota in sight. Because my friend, that’s just the way it goes. But remember, despite all this trumpeting of emotion, its still sexist to imply that women make inferior soldiers because of their more emotional nature. Go figure. More...   | ||||
|
1st-May-2007
| ||||
| ||||
Firstly, sorry about the lack of posts recently, but you know how it goes. It should be blindingly obvious to anyone with half a brain nowadays, that the only time differences between the sexes are promoted, let alone highlighted, is when it is believed that those differences will give women an inherent advantage in some way. Of course, most people would agree that there are key differences between men and women, but that’s all hushed up by the press, who only hint at this idea when they know it’ll please their female readership and temporarily appease the PC gods. Here is one of those all so familiar articles trumpeting the virtue of empathy, emoooshun and all things pink and flowery. The future is female, BT predicts "People will have to focus on being people, using their emotional skills," asserts Mr Pearson - with male confidence. And, he insists, women are instinctively good at this. “A scene of road repairs at Shepherds Bush in west London exemplifies this - steamrollers dominate the scene, not men with pick-axes or hand held shovels as would once have been the case.” Exemplifies what exactly? What he conveniently forgets to mention, is that it was most likely a MAN driving that very same steam roller. Further, it was most likely a MAN who transported that steam roller on the back of a truck. Which, in turn was probably maintained by a MAN, and so on and so forth. I can only imagine what this article would have been like if he had seen a woman on top of that steam roller.... “Machines are not a realistic substitute for child care, elderly care, nursing or other personal services, he says, questioning whether we would ever accept robots cutting our hair.” [read: questioning whether it could ever be possible to report the idea that robotics and economics might one day make women as socially redundant as this guy seems to believe men are becoming] “Computers with a "conscience" are already here says Mr Pearson. Iconic jobs, once thought impossible except by humans, have been already been replaced.” Well surely then matey, no matter how hard it might be to accept, it shouldn’t be too long before those caring assets you so proudly ascribe to women can simply be coded in to a machine? Ah yeah, BBC article, I remember now. "The future is female - and these changes are closer than many realize," says Mr Pearson. And I can guarantee that if this is indeed the case, there won’t be a male-friendly quota in sight. Because my friend, that’s just the way it goes. But remember, despite all this trumpeting of emotion, its still sexist to imply that women make inferior soldiers because of their more emotional nature. Go figure. More... | ||||
|
1st-May-2007
| ||||
| ||||
Firstly, sorry about the lack of posts recently, but you know how it goes. It should be blindingly obvious to anyone with half a brain nowadays, that the only time differences between the sexes are promoted, let alone highlighted, is when it is believed that those differences will give women an inherent advantage in some way. Of course, most people would agree that there are key differences between men and women, but that’s all hushed up by the press, who only hint at this idea when they know it’ll please their female readership and temporarily appease the PC gods. Here is one of those all so familiar articles trumpeting the virtue of empathy, emoooshun and all things pink and flowery. The future is female, BT predicts "People will have to focus on being people, using their emotional skills," asserts Mr Pearson - with male confidence. And, he insists, women are instinctively good at this. “A scene of road repairs at Shepherds Bush in west London exemplifies this - steamrollers dominate the scene, not men with pick-axes or hand held shovels as would once have been the case.” Exemplifies what exactly? What he conveniently forgets to mention, is that it was most likely a MAN driving that very same steam roller. Further, it was most likely a MAN who transported that steam roller on the back of a truck. Which, in turn was probably maintained by a MAN, and so on and so forth. I can only imagine what this article would have been like if he had seen a woman on top of that steam roller.... “Machines are not a realistic substitute for child care, elderly care, nursing or other personal services, he says, questioning whether we would ever accept robots cutting our hair.” [read: questioning whether it could ever be possible to report the idea that robotics and economics might one day make women as socially redundant as this guy seems to believe men are becoming] “Computers with a "conscience" are already here says Mr Pearson. Iconic jobs, once thought impossible except by humans, have been already been replaced.” Well surely then matey, no matter how hard it might be to accept, it shouldn’t be too long before those caring assets you so proudly ascribe to women can simply be coded in to a machine? Ah yeah, BBC article, I remember now. "The future is female - and these changes are closer than many realize," says Mr Pearson. And I can guarantee that if this is indeed the case, there won’t be a male-friendly quota in sight. Because my friend, that’s just the way it goes. But remember, despite all this trumpeting of emotion, its still sexist to imply that women make inferior soldiers because of their more emotional nature. Go figure. More...
| ||||
 |
| Tags |
| caring, women |
| Thread Tools | |
| | |||||||
| ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| One of those caring female cops dumps handicapped man onto floor... | christianj | Australian Men's News | 0 | 15th-June-2008 06:10 AM |
| More caring and sharing women..... | christianj | Australian Men's News | 1 | 4th-July-2007 11:13 PM |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:12 AM.
 |
