Gynocentric is a word I thought I had invented when I first began on my own MRA mission some years ago... until I read it a few times.

I created a feminist sock-puppet a while back who used to have a wonderful grasp of the English language... I'll see if I can find a few quotes from her. Not so much the words, but the simplistic approach used by my sock-puppet.

Ahha, here we are... one of the many Q's I answered with my sock-puppet on Y!A:

Can a non-feminist still be a "feministical"? - Yahoo! Answers

Can a non-feminist still be a "feministical"?

The more I hear that word (well read it and hear it in my head) the more I like it! As a noun or an adjective.

I don't call myself a feminist but I could see calling myself a feministical. It's like something like a whimsical feminist is what it suggests to me.


Do you think the trolls who started it would mind?

My sock-puppet reply:

Quote from Tehab Waaaaaah

Best Answer - Chosen by Asker

GADZOINKS sistur!

You am righted agains. Feministicals am a wondyful words. As it am maded up by a feministical, it am clearly superiorous - but equal - to uther big words thrown around like confettys.

I is not going to minds if you am wantings to uses it.

But do pleased be remembering to added a copywrite simbols at teh end of it. After all, I is HOOMAN! (superiorous hooman)


Edits: May I be so baldy as too correct your grammers above? You should bee saying 'would teh superiorous feministical who started it mind?"

I is not a troll - and I definitely not a trollS. I am justed one personage with a senses of HOOMOR!!!
Source(s):

man loving feminist

The name 'Tehab Waaaaaah' was a mockery of a well known feminist lacking in any thing resembling a sense of humour, always screaming IN CAPS at people when TRYING TO MAKE A POINT and as far as I could tell, she cried a lot. Here is it's profile: tehabwa's Activity - Yahoo! Answers

Aye.. I have words and terms I USE and words and terms I like to AVOID..

Anything to do with "gender" is on my "avoid" list because the feminist types co-opted that one..

Anything to to with "equality" is very dubious for the same reason, but the statement "men and women are equal" is fine by me because I have no quarrel or disagreement with that..

The power of femininity easily balances the power of masculinity..

I tend to invent terms as I go along, some are good, some are already existing, and some don't seem to be used by anyone other than myself..

I like the term "maternopath" which describes the way many mothers behave in their "gatekeeping" behaviour regards their kids .. (they like to assume all the rights and powers of THE PARENT regardless of any other persons "stake" in "her" offspring".. And have scant regard for any of these other peoples natural interests etc..)...

I recently came up with what I thought was a super term for the output of feminist journalists of a certain type.. "jamrag journalism".. The sort of writing that is totally femicentric and basically mocks or belittles males..

One could of course extend the "tampon related" concept to politics.. "Jamrag politicians" such as David Cameron (Of the CUNT-SERVERtive party) famously grovelled to Single Mother Slappers (SMS's) telling them they were "heroic" for denying access to their childrens fathers, who were of course dreadful beasts who deserted these women and did not pay the states fatherhood penalty.. (CSA = Chancellors Support Agency)..

With so many Jamrag politicians "Flange Maggotting", (crawling up the ladies nether regions in the manner most commonly seen in the LABIA party "members" (be they flacid mangina ones, or Harriet Hateman's strapadicktomy types) in the quest for the Fickle Femme Short-sighted Grasper Vote), we have a hard job on our hands trying to Decontaminate the minds of the Brainwashed General Pubelic..

male disposability

war on boy’s education

I think some of the words & phrases you use will only serve to ring alarm bells for most people.

Quote from felixblue

..."jamrag journalism"... "Jamrag politicians" ... CUNT-SERVERtive ... Single Mother Slappers ... Fickle Femme Short-sighted Grasper Vote ... Brainwashed General Pubelic..

They're just plain silly & insulting while failing to actually give any notion of what they mean in a legitimate sense. e.g. Calling all SMS's by that term isn't reasonable, a number might be in that position through no fault of their own (i.e. husband dies when kids are young, he could be on active duty but new acquaintances don't realise simply because they've never seen him around). Referring to the public as pube-lickers who are all brainwashed... well, I know if someone referred to me that way I would be questioning their state of mind and asking just how reliable any other claims they might make.

I ain't knocking ya, but I think we need to address the idea of language quite seriously. And in my experience, using silly terms doesn't usually inspire an inquisitive line of conversation from people.

And it is people we are trying to convince of our legitimacy, yes?

..."jamrag journalism"... "Jamrag politicians" ... CUNT-SERVERtive ... Single Mother Slappers ... Fickle Femme Short-sighted Grasper Vote ... Brainwashed General Pubelic..

I hadn't seen this. This just appalls me. I don't understand you FelixBlue.

If you think this is clever, edgy, or challenging peoples' perceptions, then you're on another planet as far as I am concerned. If I saw this as a newbie, it would just make turn away from the MRM immediately, and never come back. It is damaging, and just makes us look like extremist nutters. I want no part of this kind of thing.

Fuck it -- I 'll keep this to myself in the future.

And it is people we are trying to convince of our legitimacy, yes?

antimisandry.com WANTED: Language Suggestions

Fair point Marx, but which people are we trying to convince and why?

I guess that FB - in his own inimitable way - is trying to say that if the the media and the political parties are tools of feminism, what exactly is legitimate?

I'd like to expand on this - but not at 2am..... to be continued....

Quote from Yan Yan

I guess that FB - in his own inimitable way - is trying to say that if the the media and the political parties are tools of feminism, what exactly is legitimate?

One can never please everybody. The more you try to please, the more you displease. Speak the truth, and speak it with conviction; else others may see you as a weak pansy not worth the time of day.

OK, but say many people were wearing tin-foil hats. Say it were normal and people just didn't notice others doing so.

Out comes whoever and calling everyone brainwashed, pointing to the tinfoil hats and stating "There, look, it's fucking tin and it's on your head and it's a damn hat!!!"

People won't listen.

Sheeple.

No, that's not a suggestion - not for 'level 1' anyway - for a language suggestion.

All I'm saying, is cool off the venomous tongue... put the attacks away.


Not many people will take kindly to being insulted with made-up words clearly designed only to be insulting.

Quote from Marx

OK, but say many people were wearing tin-foil hats. Say it were normal and people just didn't notice others doing so.

Out comes whoever and calling everyone brainwashed, pointing to the tinfoil hats and stating "There, look, it's fucking tin and it's on your head and it's a damn hat!!!"

People won't listen.

Sheeple.

No, that's not a suggestion - not for 'level 1' anyway - for a language suggestion.

All I'm saying, is cool off the venomous tongue... put the attacks away.


Not many people will take kindly to being insulted with made-up words clearly designed only to be insulting.

I agree. Some times the best way to convince someone that they are doing wrong is to lead them to the truth. Instead of directly telling them that they are wrong, show them some facts or information that will lead them to convince themselves that they are wrong.

What about something simple, like "male discrimination"?

Of course, dont want to upset those lovely feminists, single mothers and the pussy appeasing politico's do we?

Pathetic.

You don't have to use my terms, you can use whatever borrowed from the feminists culture of victimhood terms you want..

Just not my idea of inspirational stuff likely to attract the angry young men needed who can have a good laugh..

What do these folks you dont want to uspet call us?

Rapists.

Ah, thats ok.. You know something, I don't even feel offended!

Quote from FloatyBoaty

One can never please everybody. The more you try to please, the more you displease. Speak the truth, and speak it with conviction; else others may see you as a weak pansy not worth the time of day.

You have been in the MRM for just a few months and already you are starting to see what types the MRM seems to get along with best.. Those who want to compete with the ladies for victim status.. Not my preferred take on it I have to say!

As I've said previously, we need a kind of 'step programme' to work from.. including the language we use when discussing the issues.

Level 1 could be simple things such as educating people in the basics, like pointing out already highly-visible areas where men are undeniably discriminated against. F4J and similar groups have done a lot of our work for us here through their scaling of various high-profile buildings and media attention. In short, most rational people already accept that father's are discriminated against in the so-called family-courts.

Level 2 might be to introduce lesser well-known areas of male-discrimination, but ones we can clearly back-up with open sources that can easily be cited. By now, we can begin introducing familiar terminology from a male-reference that people can relate to. Words like 'discrimination' and similar. Again, words that people can relate to.

So far, we're only gathering support without finger-pointing.

Level 3 could introduce a few terms, such as 'misandry', it's unfamiliar to the recipient. By now we've already established that the person is listening and absorbing what we say so we have been afforded the opportunity to educate the person and elaborate on what that word means. We don't yet need to introduce feminist ideology... that will put a lot of people off if we begin finger-pointing feminism as the cause of all men's problems. Why? Because most people will still be under the belief that their dictionary is right when it claims in word-alone that feminism is equality of the sexes.

Level 4 by now, we can assume the people/person we're engaging with is listening, absorbing and enquiring further. So, we can begin to explain where some areas of the issues men face are coming from... no need to name names or organisations just yet - keep it nice n' easy to retain the people's/person's attention & focus.

Level 5 now we can begin to introduce concepts, point at groups and name a few names.



This is just an 'on the spot' effort to draw a kind of plan of action for introducing people into the MRM and recognising the feminist agenda.

Quote from felixblue

Of course, dont want to upset those lovely feminists, single mothers and the pussy appeasing politico's do we?
Pathetic.

Well, I see that we have a choice between your idea and my idea...

Tactic #1
You:Hey you smelly fat cunt, give me 10 minutes of your time you wank-fest prick.
Them: Fuck you *SMACK*

Or

Tactic #2
Me: Hi, can you spare 10 minutes for a quick chat?
Them: Sure, what's on your mind?

The 1st one seems like foreplay.