Which term better describes the current state of affairs we currently live in??

[FFFF]

hehehehe, I enjoy still disagreeing with some things.

No, that's not why. It is a pride thing. Money has nothing to do with it. Men don't handle this well at all. They see in their mind that man with THEIR woman over and over again. It eats away at them. They cannot forget it and they cannot forgive it. Best women just don't do it.

Hey, what the man wants the man will get. How honourable is that?

We still live in a Patriarchy society. We mess with nature but we will never win.

Well, its all the same really, no need to disagree, but being female, you just have to!!

end of the day, a man likes to keep his property for himself.. He would not like some other cunt riding his horse, driving his car, or plonking his haddock, without his permission..

[julie]

Well, its all the same really, no need to disagree, but being female, you just have to!!

end of the day, a man likes to keep his property for himself.. He would not like some other cunt riding his horse, driving his car, or plonking his haddock, without his permission..

OK. Of course you are right. But it is because you are right so much that I like to find a little hole. I too like to feel smart. Women are trying to fit in the man's world. It is so simple what is happening here.

They can't do it you know. Eventually we will go back to the best fit for the job will be chosen.

[elzoog]

OK. Of course you are right. But it is because you are right so much that I like to find a little hole. I too like to feel smart. Women are trying to fit in the man's world. It is so simple what is happening here.

They can't do it you know. Eventually we will go back to the best fit for the job will be chosen.

I bet if a woman were to save money and buy herself a car, she wouldn't want the man driving it unless she is able to set up restrictions on how or where he could drive it to. It's not just men, but human nature in general to not want someone else using your things.

[julie]

I bet if a woman were to save money and buy herself a car, she wouldn't want the man driving it unless she is able to set up restrictions on how or where he could drive it to. It's not just men, but human nature in general to not want someone else using your things.

You shouldn't let others drive you car full stop. Not if you are a single person. It can strain friendships if the friend has a crash and if they are borrowing your car then they cannot afford to fix it else they would have their own car.

But in relationships this is the first time I have ever heard a female will not let her husband or long time boyfriend drive their car. But of course everyone is different.

[Alexandra]

Manginarchy. Look at the manginas pandering to las feministas.

[Demosman]

we are, and have always been, living in a idiocracy.

[Fruit_Cake]

i think that most power is held by men who think the are superior to women and so they have to treat us as if we needed handouts and things to make up for our inherent inferiority.

they are wrong and thats why we have a society as we do, becauselikewise lots of women play up to this ideal, recieve the benefits of it and silently chuckle at the inherent inferiority of this type of men.

frankly, they all want to make me vomit.

[Rebadow]

i think that most power is held by men who think the are superior to women and so they have to treat us as if we needed handouts and things to make up for our inherent inferiority.

Yes, you are correct. But now I wonder, where did they get this idea and why it's a worthwhile idea at that, why does it pay off so well...

[Adrian]

Yes, you are correct. But now I wonder, where did they get this idea and why it's a worthwhile idea at that, why does it pay off so well...

It is a bunch of beta males that are using women to dominate the males that would otherwise be alpha males. Women certainly get or can get something out of the deal. But, the primary actors are a bunch of men that would be something of "losers" in an 18th century society. They are the true architects of it all -- feminism, political correctness, cultural marxism, etc. They can only ever pull it off in a very civilized society where physical force really doesn't play a lot into most people's lives and with roughly an equal distribution of men to women. Only, under these circumstances can something as simple as enfranchizing some new group of people really completely and consistently change outcomes causing long term change.

Women, as a group, really aren't all that potent all by themselves. Only a few agitators might be exceptions to the rule that women are motivated, if anything, to submit not act. Yes, men ultimately hold the force, but the battle for dominance was over long before that issue came up. Women want to submit! You don't even have to ask let alone force anyone. How easy is that? If it didn't work out that way, we would scarcely have survived as a species for this long. We certainly wouldn't be reproducing fast enough, that's for sure. That is why it is really a manginarchy not a patriarchy nor a matriarchy. (Though without maginarchy as an option, I guess I would pick matriarchy. It's ludicrous to think it is a patriarchy.)

[shaazam]

"I don't believe a Matriarchy could ever work without Dupes or Manginas."

sums it up in a nutshell !

The manginas are the "useful fools " alluded to by Lenin who work for the system that will ultimately destroy them

as the fools that worked to uplift communism and were later sent for 30 years in the Gulags for political crimes eg ( calling Stalin a despot would have done it )

for the feminists such manginas work for the benefit for feminist women ( non feminist women are deemed not to exist" later they will run the manginas through the feminist divorce machinery and reduce them to paupers

[brian44]

A femicentric, dying, patriarchy. The first step to a matriarchy.

[byslexic_danana]

Matriarchy has to come before anything close to manginarchy can; therefore, matriarchy.

[Douglas]

matriarchy

–noun, plural -chies.

1. a family, society, community, or state governed by women.

2. a form of social organization in which the mother is head of the family, and in which descent is reckoned in the female line, the children belonging to the mother's clan; matriarchal system.

Most western countries are democracies. In a democracy, regardless of who is the current politician, the ultimate power resides with the elector. Most western democracies have women as the majority voter. Therefore, most western countries are a state governed by women.

In many western nations, the woman in a relationship has the ultimate power, backed up by legal process. She can usually succeed in removing the man from his home (some countries even have laws that just because the man is bigger, the police will remove him even if he has clearly been attacked by his woman). Where children are involved she has over 80% chance of keeping those children, removing the man from the home and making him pay. The woman is the legal head of the household.

Less than half of children born in most western nations are born under wedlock. Most of those children, and some of the children born in wedlock, bear the mother's surname. Over 10% of children do not even have accurate knowledge who their genetic father is. Over half of children borne these days reckon their surname by the mother, not the father.

In every sense of the definition of matriarchy, it seems to me that we live in a more matriarchal society than a patriarchal one. It doesn't seem to sit well with many women, nor most men, but that is what we have.