Life Without Sex

[ACLAF]

To hell with the game. Nobody owes it to themselves to play it.
That's the beauty of free will.

if you're not trying to get something between the sheets, you're losing the game. You can pass over your turn for your whole life, but sadly, this game is one that you can't quit, even if you refuse to play.

Emphasis added.

Partaking in the game is not needed because human beings are not animals.
Sorry to prick your balloon, but the world will not end if young men refuse to chase tail.
Young men don't have to chase ass and they sure as hell, don't have to kill themselves for it!

This is mixture of truth and falsehood. Human beings survive in the same manner as animals do. If we do not reproduce, we go extinct, period fullstop.

All the people who measure these sorts of things are becomming quite alarmed at the trend of young men's disaffectation with society. Dr. Zimbardo cited internet pornography and video games, which I believe are little more than convinient scapegoats to avoid talking about the real problem:

The solution would be to continue encouraging MGTOW until such time as EVERYBODY acknowledges the real problem, not the convinient scapegoats.

However. Those who do tune-out and withdraw from society, like Japan's grass-eating boys, are selecting against themselves. And no ammount of denial, or half-truth is going to change that.

[Zuberi]

This is mixture of truth and falsehood. Human beings survive in the same manner as animals do. If we do not reproduce, we go extinct, period fullstop.

With the turkey baster creationists and sperm banks around, I don't think so!
The dykes and den mothers (single moms) are spamming children on a regular basis. In this current anti male political climate, young men are inviting destruction if they have kids.
But you already knew that, right?

[Popadibs]

People with the tools to be productive should deselect themselves from society. Why produce offspring with the capability to be productive in a society that awards ineptitude and parasitism?

We should only be productive if we do it for ourselves and I personally feel that it's only right to help others as long as it isn't enforced. However, if productive people die off or remove themselves then society will just be reaping what it sows.

With the turkey baster creationists and sperm banks around, I don't think so!
The dykes and den mothers (single moms) are spamming children on a regular basis. In this current anti male political climate, young men are inviting destruction if they have kids.
But you already knew that, right!

The tend to be non-productive, though, and often criminals.

[ACLAF]

With the turkey baster creationists and sperm banks around, I don't think so!
The dykes and den mothers (single moms) are spamming children on a regular basis. In this current anti male political climate, young men are inviting destruction if they have kids.
But you already knew that, right?

In Canada, there's a shortage of donor sperm, because it was ruled against the law to compensate men for their donations. The big-government idiots at Health Canada believed that Canadian men's compassion would keep the supply strong and healthy. No such luck. In the past few years, Canada has routinely had to buy donor sperm from the United States, at exorbitant costs, and even that is in short supply!

And yes, I'm fully aware of the financial, emotional, and physical risks that young men run if they have children in this climate. As I've argued elsewhere - as single motherhood goes up, the evolutionary rewards of fatherhood in a two-parent family go up as well. It's a bit like shifting from the blackjack table to the roulette wheel. The odds are longer, but the rewards can be much, much bigger.

It's up to you whether you decide to risk it or not, I could care less.

And you're still wrong. If we humans don't reproduce, we humans go extinct.

[Popadibs]

We'll be dead by the time we go extinct anyways (unless it is a mass extinction).

[Zuberi]

In Canada, there's a shortage of donor sperm, because it was ruled against the law to compensate men for their donations. The big-government idiots at Health Canada believed that Canadian men's compassion would keep the supply strong and healthy. No such luck. In the past few years, Canada has routinely had to buy donor sperm from the United States, at exorbitant costs, and even that is in short supply!

And yes, I'm fully aware of the financial, emotional, and physical risks that young men run if they have children in this climate. As I've argued elsewhere - as single motherhood goes up, the evolutionary rewards of fatherhood in a two-parent family go up as well. It's a bit like shifting from the blackjack table to the roulette wheel. The odds are longer, but the rewards can be much, much bigger.

It's up to you whether you decide to risk it or not, I could care less.

And you're still wrong. If we humans don't reproduce, we humans go extinct.

I respect your stance.

Sorry comrade, but I can't risk it.

[Yan Yan]

And you're still wrong.

If we humans don't reproduce, we humans go extinct.

It's not a problem for non-feminist societies - a majority of the world's population incidentally. They're still busy raising children with two parents and legions of interfering extended family members who also feel they have a personal stake.

Humanity is safe and well, despite the attempts of the feminized nations to impose their view on the world via the media, coca-cola and hi-tech weaponry.

Western men are in a quandry and no mistake. Now that the genie is out of the bottle and the "Princess of Lies" rules supreme, the prizes go to the most devious males.

[The Possible Human]

In Canada, there's a shortage of donor sperm, because it was ruled against the law to compensate men for their donations. The big-government idiots at Health Canada believed that Canadian men's compassion would keep the supply strong and healthy. No such luck. In the past few years, Canada has routinely had to buy donor sperm from the United States, at exorbitant costs, and even that is in short supply!

And yes, I'm fully aware of the financial, emotional, and physical risks that young men run if they have children in this climate. As I've argued elsewhere - as single motherhood goes up, the evolutionary rewards of fatherhood in a two-parent family go up as well. It's a bit like shifting from the blackjack table to the roulette wheel. The odds are longer, but the rewards can be much, much bigger.

It's up to you whether you decide to risk it or not, I could care less.

And you're still wrong. If we humans don't reproduce, we humans go extinct.

Just think, there is another talking point for the "War on Women", a shortage of gametes because there is a GOP plan to starve women into submission by not allowing them access to high quality, super intelligent, and guaranteed baby producing jizz.

[ACLAF]

And you're still wrong.

It's not a problem for non-feminist societies - a majority of the world's population incidentally. They're still busy raising children with two parents and legions of interfering extended family members who also feel they have a personal stake.

Humanity is safe and well, despite the attempts of the feminized nations to impose their view on the world via the media, coca-cola and hi-tech weaponry.

Western men are in a quandry and no mistake. Now that the genie is out of the bottle and the "Princess of Lies" rules supreme, the prizes go to the most devious males.

I don't expect us to go extinct, but we are being out reproduced by societies who allow men to marry up to 4 wives, if you know what I'm sayin'. Of course, in Northern climates those same women have been known to develop rickets... Something about not being out in the sun enough. I dunno, some kinda made-up illness.

Joking aside, you've got me there yan yan.

Just think, there is another talking point for the "War on Women", a shortage of gametes because there is a GOP plan to starve women into submission by not allowing them access to high quality, super intelligent, and guaranteed baby producing jizz.

You and I both know that if it wasn't so absurd, they'd start this one up TOMORROW. Though here it's the Conservative Party of Canada's war on women.

[Traveler]

Demonstrating that you're not all that interested in whatever it is that your interested in is very empowering.

Hey - what a cool quote - I just wrote that all by myself.

That is an awesome quote. You should write bumperstickers or novelty cards

Added after 6 minutes:

I don't expect us to go extinct, but we are being out reproduced by societies who allow men to marry up to 4 wives, if you know what I'm sayin'. Of course, in Northern climates those same women have been known to develop rickets... Something about not being out in the sun enough. I dunno, some kinda made-up illness.

Joking aside, you've got me there yan yan.



You and I both know that if it wasn't so absurd, they'd start this one up TOMORROW. Though here it's the Conservative Party of Canada's war on women.

Makes you wonder if any of them are intelligent enough to read "Y: The Last Man". It may be a mere comic book series, but it's pretty telling about what a one-sex society would look like. If any of YOU haven't picked it up, I highly recommend! (Then again, I work at a comic/game store, so I might be biased )