How to really solve the gender inequality problem

[Douglas]

We call it a red pill. [video]

So THAT's what this "Red Pill" stuff is about! Thank you for posting that clip. I like fiction, science fiction particularly, but I'd far rather talk in term of reality. Marx tried to explain it once but it's good to see the film clip.

[nickb275]

It's all about seeing reality. Some chicks just don't see it. Men when they actually wake up, many go berserk.

Tumbling down the rabbit hole.

Here is another bimbo, watch and learn.
The REAL Definition of Social Media | Red Pill Email

Duh!? What age are you from?

You do realize that we live in a society where it is both sexist to both men and women

[Missy-A]

Yes -- I just want gender to be less of an issue. Things were better when we didn't take the opposite sex for granted. Keep in mind, men only had the right to vote a short time after it was only landowners that could vote. The world will never be 'completely equal'. However, we can get as close as possible hopefully without screwing with biology(For example, the slut walk goes against biology - Men are GOING to look, they will just be more subtle about it).

When I speak of equality, I mean equal opportunity.

[Marx]

However, we can get as close as possible hopefully without screwing with biology(For example, the slut walk goes against biology - Men are GOING to look, they will just be more subtle about it).

When I speak of equality, I mean equal opportunity.

A while back a 'joke' article was posted on here about a new law in Australia where workmen (e.g. building site) had to lower their eyes in the company of women, if they looked a woman for more than 7 seconds they faced being punished and it was written into policies for Aussie companies to adhere to.

Somehow, that joke article seems a step closer each feminists open their dirty stinking mouths.

[Missy-A]

And this does not surprise me.

It's all about power. The more women in power around the world, the stronger their division becomes, the more influence the UN has over the world etc etc.

It's not a bad thing that more women have power, but their target is not equality. If they're willing to do social experiments on cultures, it's a big power transferance experiment and certain cultures aren't even close to ready for it yet. The more feminists in power, the more powerful feminist organizations become and they can dictate more of what goes on in the world (even that crazy crap in Sweden where they're banning urinals).

Look at the Haiti experiment. Summaries and Reports -- Environmental management and the mitigation of natural disasters: a gender perspective - Just gloss over the first four paragraphs. It's a system that the United Nations uses with the World Food Programme wing, but in this case, it's influenced by the Department for the Advancement of Women. That's why you saw food being distributed exclusively to women during Haiti. It's not because the men are more violent, it clearly states in this link that it's premeditated. The men are violent because of the backlash of not receiving food when they're starving.

Let me give you a scenario,you are a starving woman in Haiti. it's a Social Engineering EXPERIMENT and Haiti is the guinea pig. It's supposed to empower women right? To give them more influence, I guess. But, the backlash is, when you see a woman receiving preferential treatment, they are noticing lots of backlash as a result. If you deny a starving man food, don't you think he's more prone to violence? So the violence is the end result of this situation, NOT the other way around.

[Missy-A]

I truly recommend that you spend time lurking, reading up, making the occasional comment or questioning something (and please do help put a stop to any misogyny or misandry you see here).

Yes, please do, Lucia.

[nickb275]

Wow, some powerful advice from Missy. I think you are awesome Missy. I know you hate me, but you still acknowledge that men are in a sad state of affairs. Good on you!!

[michael k]

Short quick answer (sorry have given much prior thought on subject without much reading here) ?

1) From almost DAY ONE train All Newborn Boys into the traditional girl social role(s) of child nurturing etc etc
and Vise Versa (i know i know sounds "counter-intuitive" but . . .)

2) Do Away Completely with all preconceived, false, rational/objective judgement suspending notions especially fostered by oppressive "WESTERN RELIGIONS" in general

3) Add about another 200,000 years of NATURAL SELECTION / EVOLUTION . . .

4) In meantime optional: Read Durant's The Story of Civilization / Philosophy (again in general) and
French Revolution Romantic Rousseau in particular ( women think "can rule" but by very nature cannot )

=) And Then See What <scratch>Mother</endscratch>(oops!) Earth Nature has to say about it / done?

( on a more relevant note remember a "democracy of numbers" is a necessary evil, NOT the best form of government and see: Postgenderism as well )

[Yan Yan]

Wow, some powerful advice from Missy. I think you are awesome Missy. I know you hate me, but you still acknowledge that men are in a sad state of affairs. Good on you!!

You too nickb???? Seconded!

[Missy-A]

You too nickb???? Seconded!

I don't hate you Yan Yan or anyone. Hate is a very strong word.

[Zuberi]

As Zuberi says, pure Communism.

And of course the party leaders (feminists male and female) are more equal than others.

Yes, it is communism and it's a lost cause. A certain historical figure wanted women to have full equality and it was a major proponent of his state capitalistic mission. As it turns out, 79 million people died because of his policies. If anything, history has taught me that gender equality or any type of equality doesn't exist. I'm sure that won't sit well with feminist drones and progressive cheerleaders but it's the cold hard truth!

[haute macabre]

Men and women won't ever be fully equal in terms of gender. We are equal as humans but different genders. We are designed to compliment each other, while still being opposite. If you ever go in stores like Target, you will see items that are gender specific. We require different things.

[nickb275]

Sometimes, when I see the vast amounts of things accomplished by males, and then look to what so few females have built, it begs to show that both genders are extremely different.

Men built and destroyed many civilizations. Women populated and survived them with their backs. Both are great things. Is one really better than the other?

Hard to say seeing how men of late have been lying on their own backs and doing nothing.

We are entering into a new dark age of social and economical disdain. We wanted too much, especially the female gender of the past few decades in regards to walking close to the sun. At some point mother nature was bound to ask for the bill. Men have already paid this bill. They got their very reason for existing taken away by their very desire to build. That is what happens when you allow a so called elite to power. They feel empowered and take more and more.

Humans are takers, that is pretty much the only thing I feel we are equal at!

Mother nature, now there is one strong woman.

[Zuberi]

Mother nature, now there is one strong woman.

The creator of mother nature is perfect. Something that no feminist stooge, greedy politician, corporate scumbag, nor Jewish banker(gangster) will ever be.

[haute macabre]

The creator of mother nature is perfect. Something that no feminist stooge, greedy politician, corporate scumbag, nor Jewish banker(gangster) will ever be.

Amen to that, bro.They know that already, which is why the fools are against him.