Thread: Pining for the Dark Ages........
-
17th-October-2009 #91
-
Re: Pining for the Dark Ages........
Well, if they expect the door to be open because they were men and she's a pregnant woman carrying bags then I think it's wrong on their part but if they expect anyone and everyone to hold the door open for anyone who's in just as vunerable of a position then I'd say they aren't wrong for thinking that.
It's just hard to know if they are upset because these are men or if they're upset because the door was slammed... it's hard for me to be convinced that their gender plays no role...When I do this, and I know I will, it will be comparable to the lame learning to walk, the blind being enabled to see and the suffocated breathing again. The sky isn't the limit; there are no limits.
-
17th-October-2009 #93
Re: Pining for the Dark Ages........
Garak, would you have put an 8 month pregnant woman on her ass to make a statement against feminism? I don't think you would do such a thing. Neither would I.
That's why I think it was rude.
For the audience (Garak I don't want to challenge you because I don't believe you would do this) Correct me if I am wrong.
What would have happened if an 8 month pregnant women was injured? Her tummy was the first part that would have been hit. It wasn't her that was hurt but the baby and by her carrying the baby she was flung. If she had not been pregnant and thin she would have calculated the distance between her body and their body.
My God, she took that so well. She is really, really nice about this. I would have been worried that my unborn baby who did not do anything to these men was put on the line of life and death. I would have freaked for at least a few days over the impact. And I bet she has been freaking and that maybe she just spoke to us as a way to cope with this. That may be untrue but I could have done so.
And then I would have condemned both sides. (which I already have, lol)
..........
Men who don't like feminism seem to go all out to say women shouldn't abort a baby and yet they are all cool to say, "We don't care if we kill an unborn baby ourselves".
Hypocritical thinking gentlemen. A stand can't compromise another stand. It goes against the rules of a stand. SEE, everyone is full of shit. Everyone is all about themselves. ME, ME, ME.Ignorance is the Oppressor, Vigilance the Liberator.
-
Re: Pining for the Dark Ages........
I went back and searched it to read it again.
While the two grown men who lat the door slammed on me are obviously poisoned by the big ,bad ,rude feminist monster....... but should I no longer expect that the door be held open for me? Why on earth would women want to create a system in which chivalry is no longer ? I have been told by other women that I am capable of opening my own door, changing my own tire, etc...... all by myself and shouldn't rely on a man to do it. The fact that I am appreciative of it seems to annoy women, does it annoy you men?
Thanks to all you guys out there who are still gentlemen, us ladies appreciate it!
~Megan
This has everything to do with the fact that these were men. There was more talk about chivalry in this post than her unborn child. Chivalry was her concern.When I do this, and I know I will, it will be comparable to the lame learning to walk, the blind being enabled to see and the suffocated breathing again. The sky isn't the limit; there are no limits.
-
17th-October-2009 #95
Re: Pining for the Dark Ages........
-
17th-October-2009 #96
Re: Pining for the Dark Ages........
You are gorgeous.
I won't teach you about the differences because it is not the right thing to do in a gender war.
Just stand for men!!! That's what the feminists did (stand for women) and they didn't care how it affected the general population of men so I don't expect the men in the MRM to care about the general population of women.Ignorance is the Oppressor, Vigilance the Liberator.
-
Re: Pining for the Dark Ages........
No, the fact is it should not have mattered that they were men in the first place. It should have been mentioned just to get an idea for what happened, however, the fact that they were men should not have made a difference but since it does it is all about chivalry.
Chivalry has nothing to do with whether a woman is pregnant or carrying something. The fact that she was pregnant is just a vehicle to elicit emotion. The poster makes it clear in the first post that she expected the door to be held open for her because they were men and she's a woman so it was all about chivalry.When I do this, and I know I will, it will be comparable to the lame learning to walk, the blind being enabled to see and the suffocated breathing again. The sky isn't the limit; there are no limits.
-
17th-October-2009 #98
Re: Pining for the Dark Ages........
Well.... blah, blah, blah, blah. from me.

And seeing it from your side I can understand that you were just answering a question from the words that were put in front of you. I understand this.
I argee. It is just good manners to open the door for someone carrying something heavy or pregnant.Chivalry has nothing to do with whether a woman is pregnant or carrying something.
Please don't ever say that. I have 2 young men that I dealt with recently when their young girlfriends were 8 months pregnant. I won't tell you what they did to them because it isn't MRM positive building. But I will say, "women at 8 months pregnant are not in control of thier emotions. Their hormones take over."The fact that she was pregnant is just a vehicle to elicit emotion.
Mind you our lovely housewife superstar is an exception to the emotion overboard if you ask me.
Hmmm, I suppose she did expect it. I would have to.The poster makes it clear in the first post that she expected the door to be held open for her because they were men and she's a woman so it was all about chivalry.
Ignorance is the Oppressor, Vigilance the Liberator.
-
17th-October-2009 #99
Re: Pining for the Dark Ages........
I'm sorry you fell, Megan, and I agree with you, they should have held the door for you...but I think the reason you've given is incorrect. They should not have held the door because of chivalry, they should have held it because it was the decent, courteous thing to do. Had it been two women instead of two men, they also should have held the door for you; again, not because of chivalry but because of common courtesy.
I make a point of holding the door for anyone behind me. I just consider it good manners. And while I don't simply assume everyone is going to show the same level of courtesy, I find it unfortunate when they don't.
There's a significant lack of common courtesy today. I've taught my children to hold the door for people and there've been several instances of my children rushing to hold the door open for adults only to watch the adults (men and women) walk through without a glance, smile or single word of thanks."Every noble impulse, every unselfish expression of love; every brave suffering for the right; every surrender of self to something higher than self; every loyalty to an ideal; every unselfish devotion to principle; every helpfulness to humanity; every act of self-control; every fine courage of the soul, undefeated by pretense or policy, but by being, doing, and living of good for the very good’s sake—that is spirituality." -David O. McKay
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. Ephesians 6:12
http://equalbutdifferent.blogspot.com/
-
17th-October-2009 #100
Re: Pining for the Dark Ages........
Sir Galahad's first law of chivalry:Thanks to all you guys out there who are still gentlemen, us ladies appreciate it!
In any given group the number of "gentlemen" is directly proportional to the number of "ladies".
-
17th-October-2009 #101
Re: Pining for the Dark Ages........
"Rights for women and responsibilities for men is really license for women, slavery for men, and liberty for neither. " Dylan MacVillain
-
Re: Pining for the Dark Ages........
"Civilization can only revive when there shall come into being in a number of individuals a new tone of mind, independent of the prevalent one among the crowds, and in opposition to it- a tone of mind which will gradually win influence over the collective one, and in the end determine its character. Only an ethical movement can rescue us from barbarism, and the ethical comes into existence only in individuals."
"Until he extends his circle of compassion to include all living things, man will not himself find peace."-Albert Schweitzer
-
17th-October-2009 #103
Re: Pining for the Dark Ages........
I can too.
With my previous provisos still standing.
I am generally a courteous fellow and live with the constant disappointment with women, which is something that neither Kim nor Tera have to do in quite the same way. But I do acknowledge that you two can be disappointed with your sisters' behaviours as they reflect upon your gender.
I also get very annoyed with yobbo men.When in need of a drink to fill the soul
Drop into the Knight & Drummer Free House.
http://parzivalshorse.blogspot.com.au/
Cum dilectione hominum et odio vitiorum
Love the Sinner but not the Sin.
(St. Augustine)
“ For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against Principalities, against Powers,
against the Rulers of the Darkness of this world, against Spiritual Wickedness in high places. “
(and within ourselves)
(Ephesians 6:12 (KJV)
A Feminist is a human being who has lost her way and turned vicious.
If you meet one on the road as you Go your Own Way,
offer kindness but keep your sword drawn.
(Me)
-
18th-October-2009 #104
Established Member
- Member Since
- Oct 2009
- Location
- joy division
- Posts
- 91
Re: Pining for the Dark Ages........
Julie, what you and your sisters need to understand is, that when you fuck my brothers over individually, continuesly, you condition the whole male group. and to condition the whole male group, means doing it many many times, because males are individuals, we dont just accept something that happens once and say thats typical behaviour, we go for years and years before wiseing up, thats why its taken 50 years for this backlash, but when it comes properly, watch the fuck out.
You may also enjoy reading the following threads, why not give them a try?
-
Women's skin ages faster than men's: study
By Tyrael in forum Men's HealthReplies: 7Last Post: 30th-May-2009, 03:40 AM -
EU: Statutory Retirement Ages in Selected EU Member States
By Rebadow in forum Facts and FiguresReplies: 1Last Post: 7th-March-2007, 07:48 PM -
Calling it quits: women act early but men take ages
By Rebadow in forum Feminist/ MisandryReplies: 0Last Post: 28th-February-2007, 03:58 PM






Reply With Quote







Bookmarks