Serial Killer freed. A woman of course.

**The Possible Human** · 18th-January-2012

Quote from Unregistered

This woman has no new identity, other than her married name, so IF she had reoffended, everyone would know. Even if she reoffended under another name, her original name would still come out. So it stands to reason that for the past 19 years she has lived a law abiding life, and committed no crimes. Does this count for nothing? If so, what incentive is there to do all the right things?

You just don't get it. She is a SERIAL CHILD MURDER. She even killed her own brother for Christ's sake. The whole point of the article and related posts are to shed light on the practice of letting female criminals off easy, or with drastically reduced sentences. Going from life imprisonment to 13 years served is an incredible double standard,

When this type of double standard is routinely used (and it is), it relegates women to a lesser standard, it differentiates criminal offenses into ones men commit, and the ones women commit. By doing so, it simply re-enforces the notion that women are somehow weak, easily controlled, and not accountable for their actions. That is overt sexism that has the effect of making men look more evil for the same type of crime.

Would you support a man being released after he killed three children and tried to kill a few others? If he had killed his own brother?

If you do, then you have more forgiveness that I am capable of.

As men, we tend to be aware of dangers to our family clan and to the people around us. This awareness goes back to our origins as Hunter/Gathers. You had to be aware of your surroundings and threats to your clan, otherwise you ended up as lunch for a predator animal, or dead if another clan attacked.

When you kill another human being, you lose something of your human nature in the process. When you kill multiple human beings, it becomes easier, seductive in the power you have over another

That's what concerns me. This woman has killed multiple children. She has tasted the blood lust of killing another. What's to stop her from doing it again? At this point in time, nothing. Nothing at all.

**Popadibs** · 18th-January-2012

Quote from The Possible Human

Would you support a man being released after he killed three children and tried to kill a few others? If he had killed his own brother?

If you had asked if that person would have supported a man being released after killing three women and trying to kill a few other women, plus, killing his own mother/sister/aunt, etc. you probably would have driven the point home more. As we all know, women care more about women than they do about children. I mean, why would she care about a woman being released for killing kids? Women kill children frequently.

I don't know why I assumed this person was a woman... could be a mangina too...

Unregistered · 1st-February-2012

Quote from BertieW

I have no way of knowing whether she continues to murder or not. I would not want to accept the risk of allowing my children to be near her. Apparently some people commenting on this thread know her current name and where she lives. Please send any information about her, with documentation to prove it, to register-her.com. People in Australia have a right to know who she is and where she lives. They must be able to make an informed decision about who they will allow near their children, and where they will allow children to go. I would not allow my children to visit in her neighborhood. Please contact register-her so they can publicize information about her. It could save the lives of many children.

Yes the people of Australia have a right to safety - so does Helen Moore. She has served her time and, right or wrong, has a legal right to live in society - as safely as everyone else.

**Duran** · 1st-February-2012

Quote from Unregistered

Yes the people of Australia have a right to safety - so does Helen Moore. She has served her time and, right or wrong, has a legal right to live in society - as safely as everyone else.

Okay troll.

**rohara** · 1st-February-2012

Quote from Unregistered

Yes the people of Australia have a right to safety - so does Helen Moore. She has served her time and, right or wrong, has a legal right to live in society - as safely as everyone else.

She was rightfully sentenced to life and only served 13 years. That is NOT serving her time. This woman is clearly a mortal danger to every child she comes across. They have a right to safety and it is the states duty to protect them from this monster. The state has failed.

It is obvious that you have a cognition problem.

**Popadibs** · 1st-February-2012

Quote from rohara

She was rightfully sentenced to life and only served 13 years. That is NOT serving her time. This woman is clearly a mortal danger to every child she comes across. They have a right to safety and it is the states duty to protect them from this monster. The state has failed.

It is obvious that you have a cognition problem.

Many women defenders are blatant hypocrites which is why I point them out as such. The reaction of a woman serial killer should be the same as the reaction of a male serial killer. Them excusing a woman that killed children is like us excusing a man that targeted and murdered women. And they say we hate women? I wonder why... maybe they hate children...

**The Possible Human** · 1st-February-2012

Quote from Popadibs

Many women defenders are blatant hypocrites which is why I point them out as such. The reaction of a woman serial killer should be the same as the reaction of a male serial killer. Them excusing a woman that killed children is like us excusing a man that targeted and murdered women. And they say we hate women? I wonder why... maybe they hate children...

I think it's as simple as women hating being held accountable by either men or women. Blatant hypocrisy will be exhibited by women defending women as long as women view themselves as perennial victims.

I don't know which bothers me more, the blatant double standards and hypocrisy of the judicial system's reduction of Helen Moore's life sentence to 13 years, or the fact that she now has unsupervised access with children.

Whatever. I'm done posting my views on this travesty of justice.

**Nynrah Ghost** · 1st-February-2012

It happens often that WE are accused of being rape apologists and so forth. This anonymous coward the contrary, is a true apologist; a FEMALE serial murder apologist. A filthy one at that too; the attitude that is displayed is disgusting in it's own right.

**Popadibs** · 1st-February-2012

I should have stated the reaction of a serial killer being set free should be the same regardless of gender. I stated it wrongly.

Quote from The Possible Human

I think it's as simple as women hating being held accountable by either men or women. Blatant hypocrisy will be exhibited by women defending women as long as women view themselves as perennial victims.

I don't know which bothers me more, the blatant double standards and hypocrisy of the judicial system's reduction of Helen Moore's life sentence to 13 years, or the fact that she now has unsupervised access with children.

Whatever. I'm done posting my views on this travesty of justice.

I know but the point of my post was to point out that if we excused a serial killer who was a man that specifically killed women and was being let free we'd be labeled misogynists by the very same people defending a serial killer who is a woman who killed children and is let free. If we'd be a hater of women if we defended a man that killed several women then they are a hater of children for defending a woman that killed several children.

**byslexic_danana** · 2nd-February-2012

Quote from Unregistered

Yes the people of Australia have a right to safety - so does Helen Moore. She has served her time and, right or wrong, has a legal right to live in society - as safely as everyone else.

She can live as safely as she wants to, as far as I'm concerned; as long as it's in jail.

**rohara** · 2nd-February-2012

Quote from The Possible Human

I think it's as simple as women hating being held accountable by either men or women. Blatant hypocrisy will be exhibited by women defending women as long as women view themselves as perennial victims.

I think there is more to it than a victim mentality. I truly believe that all women with half a brain know full well that they are held to a much lower standard of accountability and responsibility than are men. Women have become dependent on this and they know it. Some would never defend such a woman as this but because of this dependency on their child like legal and social status there will always be armies of women who come to the defense of those women who's actions are indefensible. The examples of this kind of mob behavior are so numerous I don't care to even try to list them here.

**Popadibs** · 2nd-February-2012

Quote from rohara

I think there is more to it than a victim mentality. I truly believe that all women with half a brain know full well that they are held to a much lower standard of accountability and responsibility than are men. Women have become dependent on this and they know it. Some would never defend such a woman as this but because of this dependency on their child like legal and social status there will always be armies of women who come to the defense of those women who's actions are indefensible. The examples of this kind of mob behavior are so numerous I don't care to even try to list them here.

Common examples of men being held to a higher standard of accountability "don't hit females" or "that's no way to talk to a woman".

Unregistered · 3rd-February-2012

Quote from rohara

She was rightfully sentenced to life and only served 13 years. That is NOT serving her time. This woman is clearly a mortal danger to every child she comes across. They have a right to safety and it is the states duty to protect them from this monster. The state has failed.

It is obvious that you have a cognition problem.

Yes, her original sentence was life, but the courts then re-sentenced her to 14 years. She did not do this herself - the courts impose sentences.

Unregistered · 3rd-February-2012

Quote from byslexic_danana

She can live as safely as she wants to, as far as I'm concerned; as long as it's in jail.

What needs to happen is people need to accept the fact that Helen Moore is out of prison, has been for 18 years, and nothing that is said here or anywhere else will change that. Just get on with things more current, accept reality.

**BertieW** · 4th-February-2012

The current reality is that a dangerous criminal is free to continue her series of murders. She may be more careful to hide her murders now, but we have no reason to doubt that she is still an active murderer. Maybe she is not, but parents of children should not have to take that risk to save the killer a little embarrassment. Publicizing her name and address will not endanger her. Everybody knew O.J. Simpson's name and face when he was free, and nobody shot him, even though he was the most hated man in America. None of the women on register-her have been victims of violence because of their registration.