Thread: a must read CROUSE: Sacrificing boys to promote girls

Thanks for this article... very good.


For those wanting a little more information, it's an article pointing out the media portrayal of men as idiots vs female portrayal as superior, which places like Jezebel deny and mock those who point this out (see link in left side column).

Thank you for this article. I must say I'm disappointed with it. It started out okay with at least an acknowledgement of misandry in the MSM, but it ended as many other articles like it have in the past. That is with ever so special sentiment that men not doing well hurts women the most. Reading this kinda stuff is like getting a punch in the stomach right after someone shakes your hand.

Pure dribble! Since when does one pay attention to anything the pressitute USA media says . . . .

"American women have received more college diplomas than men since 1992"

This has been a pure underemployment SETUP and also why tuition debt is now what it is !

Good article.

Sadly, radica feminism’s emphasis on women’s liberation has produced a culture that neglects and even disrespects and denigrates men. Ultimately, that is hurting the nation’s girls and women, too.

Right on the mark.

I was disappointed in the articles take on why men get into college, the author postulates that the colleges and universities are lowering academic requirements to allow more men in to balance the amount of women vs men in the enrollment. What utter bullshit! When did colleges and universities start putting in place affirmative action type policies that benefit men? The answer is NEVER.

You reap what you sow. Boys and men are facing one of the most hostile societies ever in existence because they are simply male and not many people male or female give a shit.

Quote from The Possible Human

Right on the mark.

I was disappointed in the articles take on why men get into college, the author postulates that the colleges and universities are lowering academic requirements to allow more men in to balance the amount of women vs men in the enrollment. What utter bullshit! When did colleges and universities start putting in place affirmative action type policies that benefit men? The answer is NEVER.

Excellent point. I noticed the author also failed to mention the recent findings of deliberate grade inflation for girls and grade reduction for boys in the western feminist school system. I bet that had nothing to do with any of this either.

Added after 10 minutes:

For those who missed the article I'm talking about above, here it is:

Female teachers accused of giving boys lower marks - Education News - Education - The Independent


Female teachers accused of giving boys lower marks

Richard Garner


Thursday 16 February 2012


A key reason why boys lag behind in the classroom is revealed for the first time today – female teachers.
Ground-breaking research shows that boys lower their sights if they think their work is going to be marked by a woman because they believe their results will be worse.

It also shows their suspicions are correct – female teachers did, on average, award lower marks to boys than unidentified external examiners. Male teachers, by contrast, awarded them higher marks than external examiners.


The findings, published by the Centre for Economic Performance today, could have immense repercussions for boys because of the dearth of male teachers in the profession. Only 15 per cent of primary school staff are men.


The findings were yesterday described as "fascinating" by one of the country's leading academic researchers, Professor Alan Smithers, of the Centre for Education and Employment at the University of Buckingham.


He said the research, carried out among 1,200 children in 29 schools across the country, had shown a possible reason for the glaring gap in performance between girls and boys right through schooling.


It also revealed that girls tried harder if they had a male teacher because they believed they would get better marks. Their suspicions were not borne out, though, as the male teachers tended to give them exactly the same marks as the external examiners.


The study showed boys believed their answers would be 3 per cent lower if marked by a woman. The girls thought their results would be 6 per cent higher if marked by a man.


Professor Smithers said: "It is fascinating research. It does stress the importance of independent marking for high-status examinations."

Given how girls have now been promoted beyond all reasonability, one can only assume the further grotesque sacrifice of boys is fuelled by a degree of malice.

Quote from Celtic Druid

Given how girls have now been promoted beyond all reasonability, one can only assume the further grotesque sacrifice of boys is fuelled by a degree of malice.

Well, yes.

Quote from Celtic Druid

Given how girls have now been promoted beyond all reasonability, one can only assume the further grotesque sacrifice of boys is fuelled by a degree of malice.

And that malice is misandry institutionalized.

feminitism based on sheer lies and spin doesn't lend itself to objective thinking!

sure they're graduating in wimyn's studies but how many top rate engineers physicists and chemists are graduating from the new age feminit universities!

they can't find a suitable mate really wimyn are very sympathetic to other wimyn with similar lack of suitable mate and I guess they meet to-talk about their privations now and then with sharing an caring interaction