Link.

This news was already mentioned in a blog post of Eternal Bachelor, but the full news article hasn't been posted here yet until now.

Teaching 4 year olds about homosexuality? That's crazy. I'm quite fed up with the UK due to all the big, negative feminazi news recently. And UK people don't seem to be protesting or hardly to stop it. No wonder these feminazi policies are constantly being passed.

Why is this happening? Because of evil feminazi influence in the UK government. One of their primary objectives is to recruit more gays, lesbos by exposing them from a very early age to gayism and lesbianism. They despise men. That's why they create a divide between males and females via many smaller and bigger policies such as this one. It will destroy society if it's not stopped, reversed in the long run.

Not sure why this posting got a thumbs down, I think it's an excellent post.

The fact of the matter is that homosexual activists have long claimed that the only way to achieve acceptance of their lifestyle and indeed to indoctrinate others to pursue it, was to get children at a young age, and expose them to pro-homosexual media. This has been begun in earnest in the United States and Canada as well with younger and younger children. In some places, preschoolers have been similarly indoctrinated.

This is, for those who have the wisdom to see it, far larger than a British, Canadian, or American issue - this is a global movement with global aims.

After some pondering I'll explain in more detail why this is very bad and needs to be stopped.

In the United States The Centers for Disease ControlÂ’s National Center for Health Statistics revealed that only 2.3% of the population considers themselves homosexual. The statistics come from a 2002 National Survey of Family Growth and are based on 12,571 interviews with men and women ages 15-44. This includes gays and lesbos. The findings were reported in WorldNetDaily, September 16, 2005. http://www.traditionalvalues.org/urban/two.php

Other countries such as the UK can also be used as examples, but we'll stick with the United States here. In the USA the "American Indian and Alaska Natives" are about 0.8% of the population in 2005 (U.S. Census Bureau). This percentage is a bit less than half of the 2.3% homosexuals. I couldn't find a other population group in America that's near 2%, so we will use this.

Now replace the quoted words "homosexual lifestyle" with "Native American and Alaskan lifestyle" ("Native American lifestyle" for short).

The Native American lifestyle exists. Everybody could do it in their lives. Is it mandatory for children as young as 4 years old to learn the Native American lifestyle via i.e. Native-American-themed books, workshops in schools? The answer is No. Why don't all schools teach it? The answer is because that is not the defacto culture, way of life and it'll never be since itÂ’s a small, permanent minority.

Homosexuals are tolerated in many developed countries. Otherwise they would be prosecuted, locked up in jail etc. So the discrimination argument is weak. It does not validate the unnecessity of making students spend time learning about the "homosexual lifestyle" which the far majority doesn't use since it's only a lifestyle of a very small percentage of people. Banning discrimination doesnÂ’t equal the promoting of small minority lifestyles in education to create the illusion that itÂ’s not a very small lifestyle.

The example of the Native American lifestyle is also tolerated. Do students spend much time learning that in schools? No. By the same token such small minority lifestyles should at best only get a similarly small amount of attention in schools & education because that reflects reality.

There is a world of difference between discrimination and propaganda, indoctrination.

Children around the age of 4 are easy to manipulate, brainwash. Far easier then older teenagers. Teaching children as young as 4 years old in schools extensively about lifestyles that are only practiced by a small minority (around 2%) is nothing less then indoctrination and propaganda. It's a false reflection of reality and in conclusion a very bad, harmful, evil scheme which must be stopped.



The red thumb down is a icon to indicate that the topic is a bad thing. It doesn't mean that the thread is bad.