The full article is here.

love that article!

if only young men would join this forum and became aware of the utter contempt feminits have for them

and all the nasty deals that are in store for them after they sign the feminits sucker contract


sadly at that age they still have their "MOMMA" delusion intact and are driven by surging testosterone which addles their good judgment about wimin

The latter half is the more interesting:

But I don't want to leave this unpleasant subject on a negative note. Let me suggest one practical reform, to make our present legal arrangements less painful, and by way of introducing "feminism with a human face." I propose that some sort of constitutional challenge be brought to the Supreme Court, or even presented to Parliament (though I would prefer it go to the more powerful legislature), arguing for the restoration of a form of capital punishment in Canada on humanitarian grounds.
We wouldn't be asking for it in cases of murder, terrorism, etc., but only in those where a woman has decided to terminate a husband or boyfriend. The argument would be that in such cases, the woman herself should be spared the disagreeable necessity of performing the deed, and the man of having to endure an amateur execution that might prove cruel, unusual and prolonged.
Under the system I propose, where a man is to be terminated, his wife or girlfriend would simply provide his name and address to the police, who would then deliver him to a kind of "Morgentaler clinic" for unwanted men. There'd be a slight, but unavoidable paperwork delay, while the police assured themselves that all the man's property would be transferred to his widow or girlfriend by a proper will. (We might also need a court ruling to prevent life insurance companies from refusing to pay out after a man has been "euthanized.") As a legal formality, there might at first be a standing committee of qualified feminist experts at every "men's clinic," to pronounce judgment before each execution is performed. Later, our Supreme Court could strike down this formality, as an unwarranted interference in women's "equality rights." David Warren's column appears Sunday, Wednesday and Saturday.

"But I don't want to leave this unpleasant subject on a negative note. Let me suggest one practical reform, to make our present legal arrangements less painful, and by way of introducing "feminism with a human face." I propose that some sort of constitutional challenge be brought to the Supreme Court,"

the Supreme Court has been endorsing the feminits claptrap for the last forty years and ain't going change too soon

feminism hasn't got a human face

the present legal arrangement is just what the feminits want and they couldn't care less how painful it is to those that sign their sucker contract

And still the vast majority of women shout that they are oppressed.

And the minority are silent, as ever, not wishing to argue with their sistas, in case they get stabbed in the back too.

WTF!
Well that tears it as far as I'm concerned all women are now the enemy.
No mercy, no regerts.
This is just a foreshadow of things to come, when face with this shit can any man sit still in the face of a perposed gendercide and not take up arms.

Well, bugger me backwards, slap my thighs, call me Charlie and spank my ass raw - that's the very precise scenario I endured from my wife and her so-called family. There was much more, of course, but the above covers some of the main problems. Well, damn if I only were a woman - I could've murdered (ermmm, manslaughtered) them all and got away with it!

what about a sort of national festival similar to Ground Hog Day but called Lemming Day

On this day men rejected by their wives gather at the head of a glacier and simply jump off

of course they will have signed a Pro Forma dedicated their worldly assets and all and sundry remunerative benefits for his grieving wife

this would save nasty court actions which he would have lost anyway and which simply would reduce her net gain

It's a spiffing idea. I have emailed the link to Harridan Hateman and invited her to comment on when she will introduce this modest proposal into the UK.

Her website says she tries to answer every email. We'll see.

Really now?

She tries to answer every email, eh?

Hmmm


Well, here's my nice & simple one.


harmanh@parliament.uk

My email client tells me this was sent about two weeks back. I've had no reply - can't imagine why.

Harriet Harm-Men needn't reply. After all you are not amongst the group she represents, cheer leads, and encourages.

As long as favoring women works and gains votes in elections, it will continue.

Look...Polticians are not idiots, they know what to do to get elected.

If giving more and more rights to a gender gains them 3 female votes while losing them 2 male votes...well that is a successful strategy, a home run, a strike, a hit or whatever you want to call it.

So it will continue. Expect it to go right to the edge of what brings more votes in. '

That is why you won't see a men's rights agenda on big national election platforms. It's a loser. The best you could do is have equality oriented policies.

Just an FYI - the top right corner of the article is covered by some kind of "Google" ad. I can read it in the link, but not on this site. Thought you might want to know.

Steven

Gotta tell you - I LOVE this writer. He used wit and sarcasm to show the BULLSH*T that is going on when women kill men.

I could not find a link to E-mail him - anyone else see it - or a way to contact the paper?

Steven

Hot Damn, it's Beene !

Good to see such a man of stature here.

Have you swapped sand for ice?