It's been made sufficiently clear to you why you received an infraction and been placed under supervision. If you continue to heckle the forum, there are more definite measures we can take.

Quote from Fruit_Cake

as i am banned from posting on the thread that i started with the same name i'll post it here instead. The time is 19:20pm.

i suppose it'll probably get censored, but i'll keep a copy and if need be let those informed that might need to know.



i personally never wanted any rules, i never asked for any, so don't assume i did just because you have nothing else to say to me streetie pie.
I have to say the above statement really does show how empty of ideas you are.

normally i can't be bothered to argue in here because it gives me a headache, and nobody is really interested, but in this case i think its worthwhile.

did i break the rules? you see, the problem is, i didn't break any rules. The only thing i said really was that men should stop criminalising their natural instinct. I think that it really shows how brainwashed by the feminists you all really are. Those that were bright enough, understood what i meant by it pretty quickly really.

Neither do i know why you decided to censor the post i wrote to fem_scum earlier. I only said that he was right all the way through the thread, shock horror. Surely you should ban him, and drex, they are guilty too aren't they? guilty of ascociating with me!



actually, i never even thought about you at all. sorry!

it says this ban or whatever it is is going to last a whole year. Until 2009

you really want to waste your own time nit picking everything i say??

People are already getting annoyed by it and quite rightly so.

Which part of " Misandrous global/generalizations (Obviously – See the name of the site!)" as described on the guidelines/FAQ are you struggling with?
Nice try at claiming those who don't 'understand' your words as being less intelligent, but oddly, this claim of yours only came to be after FS suggested it might be how you intended it. I think the majority didn't perceive your words that way.

Quote from Fruit_Cake

as i am banned from posting on the thread that i started with the same name i'll post it here instead. The time is 19:20pm.

i suppose it'll probably get censored, but i'll keep a copy and if need be let those informed that might need to know.

You are so full of it FC. The thread is still here: http://antimisandry.com/censored_pos...75.html?t=9375

And there is no Mod action on it.

i personally never wanted any rules, i never asked for any, so don't assume i did just because you have nothing else to say to me streetie pie.
I have to say the above statement really does show how empty of ideas you are.

Wow, that made about as much sense as ...well... as you being here!

normally i can't be bothered to argue in here because it gives me a headache, and nobody is really interested, but in this case i think its worthwhile.

Worthwhile to whome?

did i break the rules? you see, the problem is, i didn't break any rules. The only thing i said really was that men should stop criminalising their natural instinct. I think that it really shows how brainwashed by the feminists you all really are. Those that were bright enough, understood what i meant by it pretty quickly really.

Blah blah... some words... blah blah.....

Neither do i know why you decided to censor the post i wrote to fem_scum earlier. I only said that he was right all the way through the thread, shock horror. Surely you should ban him, and drex, they are guilty too aren't they? guilty of ascociating with me!

Ah yess. I am the big bad censorman banning monster... Problem is, I had nothing to do wiht your infractions and other issues of late... surprise!

actually, i never even thought about you at all. sorry!

OOOooooooo ouch! Next is gonna be the small penis comeback right? or how about how I can't get a girlfriend.... or the ever popular nobody likes you TMOTS 'cause you're a big mean stinky poopie head!

it says this ban or whatever it is is going to last a whole year. Until 2009

No. Actually it says that the two point infraction that you have will expire in a year.

you really want to waste your own time nit picking everything i say??

awwwww the poor widdow girl.... the big mean man is forum raping her! Boooo ssssssssss hisssssssss Evil Evil man-child!

People are already getting annoyed by it and quite rightly so.

Who. You? So. FS? Big deal. Drex? Could care less. You are a femikook troll and are a gnats asshair from being.... bu-by!

No pussy pass here dahlin'. So you might as well take your hair-twisting attention-whoring routine somewhere else to troll for cyber-sex boy toys sweety-poo....

TMOTS

Quote from Marx

Which part of " Misandrous global/generalizations (Obviously – See the name of the site!)" as described on the guidelines/FAQ are you struggling with?
Nice try at claiming those who don't 'understand' your words as being less intelligent, but oddly, this claim of yours only came to be after FS suggested it might be how you intended it. I think the majority didn't perceive your words that way.

if 1000 idiots believe the world is flat despite 3 others being banned and hung or whatever for stating it is pretty much spherical, notwithstanding a bit of flattening at the poles and some lumpy bits and canyons here and their..

They are still fucking idiots even if they are the majority!!

Quote from Drex

if 1000 idiots believe the world is flat despite 3 others being banned and hung or whatever for stating it is pretty much spherical, notwithstanding a bit of flattening at the poles and some lumpy bits and canyons here and their..

They are still fucking idiots even if they are the majority!!

Nonetheless, fearless defender of fruitcakes, the point remains:

Quote from Marx

...this claim of yours only came to be after FS suggested it might be how you intended it.

I guess it would be like you saying in front of FC how wonderful you think she is, yet complaining about her and name-calling in her absense... yanno, it's all very well you saying "well, she's not my friend, i think she's a femikook" but actions speak louder than words, and those actions dictate the overal opinion of just how reliable the words are. That's why most of us have an issue with feminism, yes? Because we're tired of the claims for 'equality' when the actions (e.g. man-tax, VAWA, etc.) do not correlate with the claim.

Quote from themanonthestreet

You are so full of it FC. The thread is still here: http://antimisandry.com/censored_pos...75.html?t=9375

And there is no Mod action on it.



Wow, that made about as much sense as ...well... as you being here!



Worthwhile to whome?



Blah blah... some words... blah blah.....



Ah yess. I am the big bad censorman banning monster... Problem is, I had nothing to do wiht your infractions and other issues of late... surprise!



OOOooooooo ouch! Next is gonna be the small penis comeback right? or how about how I can't get a girlfriend.... or the ever popular nobody likes you TMOTS 'cause you're a big mean stinky poopie head!



No. Actually it says that the two point infraction that you have will expire in a year.



awwwww the poor widdow girl.... the big mean man is forum raping her! Boooo ssssssssss hisssssssss Evil Evil man-child!



Who. You? So. FS? Big deal. Drex? Could care less. You are a femikook troll and are a gnats asshair from being.... bu-by!

No pussy pass here dahlin'. So you might as well take your hair-twisting attention-whoring routine somewhere else to troll for cyber-sex boy toys sweety-poo....

TMOTS

OK. There you go again TMOTS.. Let it off your chest if you feel better about it.

The rest of this post is not just addressed at TMOTS, but all the mods here.. Next time I get banned from here, I dont want to have any of the mods coming round emailling me after the event saying I have a lot of useful things to contribute as long as long I dont speak up for the concerns of MEN as opposed to statists and feminazi-law appeasing little boys and girls who are looking into their pants and thinking thats all the world is about and if they could all have the same things down there we would be happy.. I have had that shite so many times.. well, if a man cant speak his mind, or use allegory and humour, or any of the natural means of communicating ideas and encouraging fresh thinking and real debate, then, whats the point of trying to paint a picture with only half the pallete of colours?


There have been MANY good folk driven off this site by the attitudes of yourselves..

I count Rob, selkie, chevalier and The Sharpened Pen as very good men, whose only real fault was that they perhaps got a bit pissed off with the clumsy moderation, feminazi appeasement, statism dominance etc.. and got into a tizz about things in the playground girly-boy world of "he said, she said.." ad infinitum...

Its getting to the point now where realistic open debate is impossible here.

You wanna preach to the converted in ever decreasing circles?

Go ahead, if you really want to take your hands of your little pricks that probably only get hard when you are slagging off women you cant understand and hit the "ban" button then there is nothing and no one stopping you.. You have that power here, big shots!!

When AM becomes another impotent cock, following the same feminised career path as the other forums in the past that have shown promise till they "sold out" you will have converted the best REAL hope for men into another whiners pit for the mangina minded..

The choice is yours..

If I were you, Id go round issuing apologies and olive branches to each and ever person you have driven off here for petty girly reasons..

That would be bigger and more manly than digging your heels in like stubborn little girls and demanding respect that is not earned!

You wont beat the women by acting like them! The women have the natual advantage in that game!!

I'm not too bothered about FC one way or the other. What annoys me is someone like FC not being allowed to have her own opinion which people disagree with, because she has a reputation for being a troll. People on this forum seem to get very defensive as soon as someone makes a post about men they don't quite like, especially when FC is involved. She really said nothing in that other thread which I didn't also say, we just said it in different words, yet she now has an infraction and her posts are being modded.

Quote from Marx

Nonetheless, fearless defender of fruitcakes, the point remains:

I guess it would be like you saying in front of FC how wonderful you think she is, yet complaining about her and name-calling in her absense... yanno, it's all very well you saying "well, she's not my friend, i think she's a femikook" but actions speak louder than words, and those actions dictate the overal opinion of just how reliable the words are. That's why most of us have an issue with feminism, yes? Because we're tired of the claims for 'equality' when the actions (e.g. man-tax, VAWA, etc.) do not correlate with the claim.

this side taking nonsense of yours is getting fucking tedious marx..

I am reluctant to critisize those who largely agree with my views, on minor issues, but I will still do so on the basis of "agree to differ".

Fruitcake is a fruitcake, she knows that, but shes not fucking stupid or narrow minded and thats what you freaks here cant get your little heads round..

If you cant open your mind any wider than your mouth, you are limited..

Quote from Drex

There have been MANY good folk driven off this site by the attitudes of yourselves..

I count Rob, selkie, chevalier and The Sharpened Pen as very good men, whose only real fault was that they perhaps got a bit pissed off with the clumsy moderation, feminazi appeasement, statism dominance etc.. and got into a tizz about things in the playground girly-boy world of "he said, she said.." ad infinitum...

Rob was good, but couldn't stop himself blathering like an idiot on crack, lying, half truths, misinformation, exaggerations, finger pointing, you name it - he was on it! You think the site should should allow for a raving lunatic to continually bash the site, letting him claim to be banned while claiming so on the site is supposedly banned from, then when he does EVENTUALLY get banned, claims it as 'proof' of his banning LoL. He was a self-fulfilled prophecy, drex. Sure he had good points, but lying won't help his cause.
Selkie was removed, she didn't remove herself (that I was aware of) for undermining a superior admin, misusing her admin access and running to Rob with private conversations - not, as Rob claims, to 'force' an apology, but I did suggest she owed John an apology yes and I also asked why she allowed him to get away with lying but was so quick to jump on John's case for closing a thread... hardly demanding conversation, but it's ok - you just get on with believing Rob.
I'm guessing you know something about Chevalier that the rest of us don't, right? And TSP had a difference of opinion with one admin...

Nonetheless, FC has been trying to create havoc since her arrival - and she has had your full support... at least, to her face. You seem to swap sides at the drop of a hat, drex. Perhaps it's time you were completely honest and open and declared your specific intentions.

Ahhh chivalry.... still alive and well......

TMOTS

testing

Quote from Drex

testing

the test appears to work... guess you aren't blocked, right? Did you get a screen specifically telling you couldn't post..? Or, perhaps a more generic error of some description? Eitherway, I went over the admin logs & no one has touched your account unless they somehow knew how to remove the doing & undoing of any account editing from the databases' history too... which would require rather a lot of work, I might add.

I almost hate to jump in here....feel free to say, "Kim, mind your own business"....but,

Am I the only one that thinks these arguements are of questionable merit and could be better resolved if people learned to take their fingers off of their keyboards, jog around the block and THEN post? :-)

Marx says he didn't even realize the options were set to review all the posts of someone once they've recieved an infraction. Quite believable, IMO, considering there's a brand new system going on. Perhaps, in the future, a calm, polite query via PM might be a better option.

I'm going to quote a bit of Drexian Wisdom from Drex's blog,

I have always been of the belief that petty personal differences about minor and largely insignificant issue should not destract from the higher unity of beliefs... If that makes any sense..

Wise words, indeed. ;-)

With perhaps an exception or two, we all share at least some common beliefs and goals. While we may differ a bit on the details, all of THIS just detracts from some really good discussion.

Quote from Marx

the test appears to work... guess you aren't blocked, right? Did you get a screen specifically telling you couldn't post..? Or, perhaps a more generic error of some description? Eitherway, I went over the admin logs & no one has touched your account unless they somehow knew how to remove the doing & undoing of any account editing from the databases' history too... which would require rather a lot of work, I might add.

No, dont worry about it.. I dont know what happened but I did not get the usual error, maybe I fucked up in some way, I cant be sure..

Just seemed damned odd..

Never mind..