Thread: Mother Kills Her 3 Kids
-
25th-February-2008 #1
Established Member
- Member Since
- Dec 2007
- Posts
- 84
Mother Kills Her 3 Kids
At least she has an excuse: she was overwhelmed.
www.wtopnews.com/index.php?nid=104&sid=1351269
-
Re: Mother Kills Her 3 Kids
She's female - no excuse needed.
-
25th-February-2008 #3
Re: Mother Kills Her 3 Kids
Jewell's father, Ricky Ward, said that he had tried to get custody of her but that child welfare officials had rebuffed him. The father of the two boys said something similar.
Now all 3 kids are dead. These two fathers should sue the child welfare office. The officials who denied their requests should at least be fired."Rights for women and responsibilities for men is really license for women, slavery for men, and liberty for neither. " Dylan MacVillain
-
Re: Mother Kills Her 3 Kids
If she was "overwhelmed" it was because there was no father in the home, most likely. Should have kept her legs closed.
-
25th-February-2008 #5
Banned
- Member Since
- Dec 2007
- Location
- USA
- Posts
- 2,002
Re: Mother Kills Her 3 Kids
That was just a "late term abortion."
How dare you criticze "a woman's right to choose"?
Blessings
Bob
-
Re: Mother Kills Her 3 Kids
She should have exercised her right to choose to keep her clothes on.
I'll never understand how a mother can do this...I'm a mother myself.
-
25th-February-2008 #7
Member
- Member Since
- Feb 2008
- Posts
- 95
Re: Mother Kills Her 3 Kids
The worst that will happen to her is found not guilty by reason an insanity or some cockamamie bs excuse. She will be treated with 'kids gloves'. Oh poor her, something must of happened to make her do this yap yap blah blah blah

If the father would of done this he would of been charged with 3 counts of first degree murder. No shrinks testifying about being 'overwhelmed' 'post partum depression' etc Not to mention it will try to be blamed no doubt on her ex for 'mental infliction' or some bs excuse.
-
26th-February-2008 #8
Re: Mother Kills Her 3 Kids
What angers me the most about this horrible tragedy is how easily it could have been prevented. She must have known she was in over her head. She must also have know that she had options. The fathers were both interested in custody, she had family around. Who among them would have turned her away if she had brought them the children and said, 'please take them, I can't take care of them and I'm afraid for their safety'? She could have walked up to ME in the street and said that and I would have taken those kids. It makes me think that women who do this would rather murder their own children then admit to failure or defeat.
"Every noble impulse, every unselfish expression of love; every brave suffering for the right; every surrender of self to something higher than self; every loyalty to an ideal; every unselfish devotion to principle; every helpfulness to humanity; every act of self-control; every fine courage of the soul, undefeated by pretense or policy, but by being, doing, and living of good for the very good’s sake—that is spirituality." -David O. McKay
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. Ephesians 6:12
http://equalbutdifferent.blogspot.com/
-
Re: Mother Kills Her 3 Kids
" These two fathers should sue the child welfare office. The officials who denied their requests should at least be fired."
Not much chance of that ! The welfare agencies are in cahoots with the feminist push and the feminist courts would never succor any action against the agencies they have virtual impunity and the folk that work in such agencies hate men more than shit
-
26th-February-2008 #10
Established Member
- Member Since
- Feb 2008
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 658
Re: Mother Kills Her 3 Kids
***The killings follow other infanticide cases around the country.
Andrea Yates drowned her five children in the family's Houston bathtub in 2001 and LaShaun Harris was convicted of tossing her three young sons into San Francisco Bay in 2005. Both stood trial on murder charges but were declared legally insane***
Same tired old story - women kill in cold blood, seemingly knowing full well in a clear state of mind what they are doing but are then declared in law to be "insane" and are automatically deemed to be "not guilty" for this very reason. Then every excuse under the sun is offered for yet another female victim of "circumstances" entirely out of her control. Bloody hell! - they even manage to gather up support groups for these women, no matter how vile and evil their actions, and killing innocent, helpless infants sure has to be the most disgusting and horrific of CRIMES!
I don't give a toss about "out of control female hormones bringing on the old "I can't help it" syndrome - I really don't believe that they should be regarded as mitigating circumstances when the victims are all these little innocents who have been denied life! It makes me pig sick, and that's for sure.
Absolutely no such leniency or mitigation is hardly ever, if at all, given in defence of men found guilty of crimes, not even thouse far less serious than those committed by these women.
I really and truly don't know why western societies come clean and set it all out in law, in black and white, no minced words or doublespeak allowed, for all of us to see, official confirmation that our westwern legal systems have two main component parts:
1 Justice for Women - basically innocent until proven guilty;
Sentencing dependent on a range of mitigating circumstances;
jailing only in very extreme cases. In the case of the USA: the
death penalty out of the question altogether no matter what
the crime, and no matter how evil.
2 Justice for Men - basically guilty until proven innocent; even
then may well be presumed guilty in many cases, especially
those of false rape claims. Jailing much more likely.
In the USA far more likely to be subject to the death penalty -
even more so if black and poor; and held in limbo for decades
in said jails until the Justice for Men sees out the ultimate
punishment.
-
26th-February-2008 #11
Banned
- Member Since
- Dec 2007
- Location
- USA
- Posts
- 2,002
Re: Mother Kills Her 3 Kids
The CPS lesbitches and the agents of Satan in black robes of hell used their typical decision process;
Dead is better than Dad.
These kids had been beaten for years, and CPS continued to ignore grandmother's pleas and father's demands for custody. The CPS lesbitchs ought to be caught and hung, and the agent of Satan should be impaled.
Blessings
Bob
You may also enjoy reading the following threads, why not give them a try?
-
It’s a Fluke that Mother Kills Baby
By Timocrat in forum AnnouncementsReplies: 0Last Post: 21st-November-2007, 05:06 AM -
Mother Kills Kids and Puts them Under Sink
By Timocrat in forum AnnouncementsReplies: 2Last Post: 13th-August-2007, 03:09 AM




Reply With Quote







Bookmarks