Yes those organizations shouldn't get any funding from tax payers.

“It [the agency] is based on the whole concept that women are victims of a patriarchal society,” Landolt said. “Nobody really believes that anymore. Its time has passed.”

Believe. There are two uses of the word. The common use is regarding the cognitions one has in one's head, whether they are true or not. "I believe..." this or that. The other usage is the original; what you live your life by. The quote may be correct in the first sense, ie that no one holds 'patriarchy is oppressive' to be true as a workable concept any more, despite the mendacious bitches who continue to profess their being victimised by it, but vast numbers live their life by holding it to be real and oppressive, our laws are distorted by the 'belief', - we all have our lives blighted by it, its anti-mantras pervade all levels of Government. Vast armies of people live their lives by the lie. The Princess of Lies rules.

It is always a good thing when them feminasties are shown the door.

But I wonder what this means...

Under heated questioning in the House of Com¬mons this week, Oda said the government is committed to taking “dramatic” action to improve the lives of women.

It may be a case of destrying one monster and creating another one.

Exactly, christianj!

Now I may be too cynical, but I say let us wait and see what really happens. Somehow I don't have much trust in all this.

Let's never forget the great contributions these mighty defenders of freedom at SOW have made to Canada.

http://www.fathers.bc.ca/sow.htm

"Among the report's recommendations is that an organization similar to Hate Watch be established to monitor men's groups on the Web, that inciting hatred on the basis of gender should be a hate crime and that women's groups establish a network to counter the masculinists' views."

---
Taking away some of their funding is not enough. I want them all working at the last DV Shelter in Canada - off the coast of Baffin Island, situated on an icefloe.

How could our government be so sick to spend my tax dollars on these stunned bitches?

Obviously, both feminists and politicians are amongst those who've "slipped through the cracks" when they were in the school system...because neither has demonstrated the ability to read (the Charter of Rights). http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/charter/index.html

I am presently home on stress leave over this. I was a union steward and I chewed out a union rep who was trying to rally support to have these cuts resinded...I told her off in no uncertain terms. I also bad mouthed
the gun registry.

Now I am a security risk and some people feel I owe women a collective appology.

In the words of Judge Judy....GET OVER IT

But I will probably be fired and loose all I have worked for just four years from retirement.

Was it worth it?

You bet it was.

The taxpayers of Canada were funding a set of air raid alarms to be permanently on. There was no chance of sane or sensible discussion on family law and other reforms when all the feminists had to say was "don't you hear those air raid alarms?"

If the feminazis want to continue being boorish bigots they can continue doing so as a hobby...Canada is a free country after all.

The Tory party has stated it's family law reform policy which is that of the MRA and likeminded women's groups. It also said it would have another free vote on sammsex marriage...not that I consider that issue to be any big deal.

But this time when the feminist commandeered CBC stages a news spot with a half dozen lesbians with marine sargeant haircuts flipping the bird to the camera and shouting "shame on you", the taxpayer will not be paying for what is taking place on both sides of the camera.

As for any speculation that this is yet another feminist Trojan horse...I really don't think so.

The Liberal senator Ann Cools ( who was one of the people who signed the Order in Council that created Status of Women back in the 1970s and who has frequently said she regrets doing it) tried to stage a series of townhall discussions on family law reform about three years ago. At every one of these meetings lesbian feminist groups came, declared that men were evil and that was all that needed to be said, and often had to be removed from the discussion hall by security for being disruptive.

They are no longer being to be paid by the government to do this.

The Liberal senator Ann Cools ( who was one of the people who signed the Order in Council that created Status of Women back in the 1970s and who has frequently said she regrets doing it) tried to stage a series of townhall discussions on family law reform about three years ago. At every one of these meetings lesbian feminist groups came, declared that men were evil and that was all that needed to be said, and often had to be removed from the discussion hall by security for being disruptive.

DOES any film of this exist at all? I would LOVE to get hold of it if it does?

Well done for sticking to your principles. We need more people like you.

If you go to the home page of www.fathers.bc.ca and follow the main post buttons they have about six clips caught on a cellphone type recorder.

Anyway, I am going to fight this present bullshit under section 8 of the Public Service Staff Relations Act which more or less permits shop stewards to tell management to go fornicate their syphilitic mothers if they want to. Without freedom of speach no shop steward would or could do their job. The union would be contracturally be obliged to defend me and apparently in the following month's meeting members did come forward to say I was supported in what I had to say.....

I just find it so exasperating...I am living like I am virtually under house arrest while all of this is happenning.

Quote from Rob

"Among the report's recommendations is that an organization similar to Hate Watch be established to monitor men's groups on the Web, that inciting hatred on the basis of gender should be a hate crime and that women's groups establish a network to counter the masculinists' views."

The reason this is so scary is that I have not much confidence anymore in our lawmakers. They've already passed some of the most outrages laws, why not this as well?

Among the report's recommendations is that an organization similar to Hate Watch be established to monitor men's groups on the Web, that inciting hatred on the basis of gender should be a hate crime and that women's groups establish a network to counter the masculinists' views."

If they can do that then a organization similar to Hate Watch to monitor women's groups on the web can be established too and men's groups establish a network to counter the feminists' views.

Quote from Tyrael

If they can do that then a organization similar to Hate Watch to monitor women's groups on the web can be established too and men's groups establish a network to counter the feminists' views.

But that's exactly the problem. Laws like VAWA don't acknowledge female aggression in the same manner. Apparently feminists are quite capable of convincing progressive politicians, and maybe even conservative, to support one-sided draconian laws.

What depresses me is not so much the viciousness of these females as the fact that so many men seem to be on their side. One of the reasons, I think, why modern women have little respect for us is that they just can't believe how gullible we are.

The recommendations in that report were the kiss of death on Sheila Copps' career and the end of funding for the "advisory council" who commissioned the report. I am personally aquainted with some of the players.

The report generated more backlash against SOW than anything else in it's history and I think the only reason the Tories are even leaving it up on SOW's website probably has things to do with the legalities until the lawsuit is heard. One of my current bosses happens to be the Tory critic of SOW who challanged Sheila Copps over it when it was first posted.

The $140,000 or so that was spent to give feminists a leg up on the internet got them nowhere...they were warned not to male bash so all they had to talk about was breast cancer. One site was even told to remove it's link to the report.

So far as I know the only site that went down on the "blacklist" was a site in Quebec called "Mensongefeminist" (feminist lies).I think that had more to do with the fact that it's administrators were practicing academics than anything the government did. All other sites are now bigger and much more sophisticated. New ones keep popping up like mushrooms. I think they realize that there is much more danger of feminists getting a spike driven through their tongues than the other way around.

The days when you could not drive through Ottawa for crowds of women singing "Bread and Roses" are in the misty past and the CBC really caný get a rise out of anyone anymore about political correctness...not even Borat.

In the lawsuit the government has taken the position that the recommendations and the slanders were the oppinions of the authors of the report and do not reflect any policy of the Government or any intent to act on these recommendations.

This report did more to galvanize, rally, and incite MRA and affiliated women's groups and family law reform groups than anything else that has ever happened.

In short...it backfired on feminism big time.

!!!!!!TOP PRIORITY!!!!!

I you haven't already heard, a survey about Violence Against Women is trying to be pushed through the UN!!!! You can read more about it at:

http://news.mensactivism.org/node/6602

If your are American, please go here immediately and send and e-mail/fax/phone call to our representative IMMEDIATELY!!! If you are not from the USA, please try and find a way to contact your UN representative asap.