Quote from BobV01

cONSIDER THIS MISANDRY:
Buzzblog: Microsoft code contains the phrase 'big boobs' ... Yes, really

1: You aren't even remotely on subject
2: Coders often need a way for them personally to find their way back to a certain snippet of code to alter it in the future, if deliberate.
3: Saying that, is like saying the stop code 0x0f00***** is offensive as it is to close to f*ck/fook when it is actually an error for functons not supported.
4: It could be just a happy coincidence.
5: Given the few amount of people in the world, that can speak hexadecimal code fluently as a native language, I dont see the offence.

Quote from julie

Ummm, has anyone hear actually been in a situation or are we just discussing something that may happen like a plane crash might happen? (except Marx)

As if it would matter to you...

This isn't something that "may" happen; this is something that does happen to a lot of men.

I could explain to you why it concerns a man whether it has happened to him or not but that would be like talking to a wall. It would be more constructive for me to nail my penis to a burning building than to try to explain anything to you.

Added after 14 minutes:

Quote from onyxmoon000

You know that you're bigger than her, why so serious? Couldn't you restrain her without putting her in the hospital? I mean, if she's got a weapon, go ahead and "power bomb" her but that seems a bit harsh otherwise lol

Even if someone is smaller than you they need to learn why they shouldn't be attacking you if they act like they don't know better. Women use their legal advantages over us but you're saying that we shouldn't use a size advantage over them, with the assumption that we have it. If someone continues to attack you while you're walking away, and for the purposes of this discussion, a woman, to me that's harsh.

She has no problems with getting a man put in jail for crimes he didn't commit. So why should a man have a problem with putting that same woman in the hospital for crimes that she did commit against him?

Calling the cops on a man when he has done no wrong is harsh, lying to the cops about an innocent man is harsh and innocent men going to prison for women's crimes is harsh. Reality is harsh and anybody who attacks someone when they're walking away needs that dose of reality.

If it doesn't matter to women that men won't hit back then it certainly wouldn't matter to women if women were bigger (hence, women attack children and the elderly). Since attacking a man while he walks away is harsh it should be met with harsh treatment. So it may very well be harsh for a man to power bomb a woman who attacks him while he's walking away but that is the kind of harshness that is justified. If she doesn't want to get hurt by a man then she should stop trying to hurt a man.

If that kind of woman wants compassion then she should go to church cause she isn't going to get any compassion nor sympathy from me. Fuck her, and to anyone who wants to defend a woman attacking a man relentlessly while he's walking away and maintains the position that he shouldn't meet her with equal or greater force just because he's a man, fuck you too. It's as simple as that.

I agree. At the most maybe just a slap but if possible, just restrain her.

It's hard to say what I might do, if it happened again. The last time, was in a club, about seven years ago. A girl of about 18, walked up to me, and gave me a slap, not too hard, but hard enough to hurt a little, on my cheek. She then did it again, then again, a little harder. I then pushed her away, with her falling over (being drunk and wearing heels, this didn't take much; I did not push her very hard). Can anyone guess what happened next? Yes, all the manginas, with their selective eyesight, appeared out of nowhere, and I left the club smartish, lucky not to have faced any greater repercussions for my equality-conducive behaviour.

All this talk about men being stronger, is irrelevant. Yes, men are stronger, and nine times out of ten, a guy could absolutely wipe the floor with a woman. However, if one retaliates with equal force, then the strength of the two people concerned is of no relevance. If a man is hit by a woman, he has every right to hit back with equal force. Do I have the right to hit Mike Tyson, without repercussion, simply because he could beat me in a fight?

I like to think that I would, if there were no witnesses and I would never see this girl again, hit back with equal force. In reality, though, I would probably restrain her, as these conditions would probably not be guaranteed, and hence I'd be setting myself up for some gynocentric 'justice'.

Lot's of argy-bargy here but the thread starts out with some misguided assumptions.

If a woman attacks a bigger and stronger male partner, it means that she does not fear consequences.
Men don't go picking fights with bigger and stronger men unless they're drunk and suicidal.

Women think they can do it because they don't expect to be hit back.
And even if they are, they can safely expect a million posing Sir Galahad's to come to their aid.

Women grow up, as little princesses, with this concept of immunity. Handed to them by their fathers and the state.

Men have only two choices.
1. Hit back hard enough that she'll never do it again.
2. Walk away and vow to avoid toxic women for the rest of your life.

Above all, don't try to fix the problem. It can't be done.
I recommend (2).
After all , there must be a few billion non-violent women in the worldld.

Quote from byslexic_danana

All this talk about men being stronger, is irrelevant. Yes, men are stronger, and nine times out of ten, a guy could absolutely wipe the floor with a woman. However, if one retaliates with equal force, then the strength of the two people concerned is of no relevance. If a man is hit by a woman, he has every right to hit back with equal force. Do I have the right to hit Mike Tyson, without repercussion, simply because he could beat me in a fight?

Do we apply this to men? If a man is weaker than you (in appearance, obviously) do you only use "equal" force? How do we measure "equal" force to begin with?

Women's legal leverage is stronger than men's and they don't restrain the force in which they use it against men. If a man uses more than "equal force" we can't blame him because when she initiated the violence she used more force than he had to begin with. She went too far when she got violent. We can't deem his violence as unnecessary and excessive because her initial violence was unnecessary and excessive. She is the catalyst of her own chaos.

I have been in situations like this. I note Julie is making it seem that the cops will always do the man in, not the woman, in such a situation.. Typical feminist tactic, trying to tell men that they had better obey the cunt and take the hits because the cops will jail them if they dont.. Bullshit. The cops are not THAT fucking inhuman generally.. There is always MORE to such tales than the teller lets us know of..

I have done the same thing as the bloke she speaks of.. Several times.. And the result was that the cops removed the women concerned from my house.. "I think you had better leave now and take up residence in the local female "refuse" dump for toxic trash you stupid bitch, only a fool would wind up a man with a serious mental health problem in his own home and refuse to leave when he asks you to.." Or words to that effect..

Men should not fear women and their shit, nor fear the law enforcers and their shit.. The only thing they should fear is fear itself, because that makes you weak and powerless when their is no need..

Samofsons knows what can be done if a man wants to have a good response that will set an example and put the fear on the other foot..

And a life in jail (or in the funny farm) is better than a life spend on your knees being abused by toxic cunts..

There are many ways of dealing with nasty violent cunts.

And it doesnt ever come to that really, because when they know, just by looking into your eyes, that you ain't of the world of the sane and regular, they will not hit you, they will drop their knickers and beg to have your babies..

And that is how most of my relationships have started.. See above for how they end!

Added after 10 minutes:

I guess what I am saying is.. If a woman I don't know starts hitting me and getting violent.. Its considered foreplay.. The old fella jacks up like blue viened steel and before you know it shes cracking her molars on the love marrow and getting some beef in her egg chute..

Make love, not war..

That question cannot possibly be answered in a general way. the situation itself would dictate which course to take.
I will say that if you hit a man you had best be prepared to be hit back. Violence tends to bring more violence.
I would even posit that if "Never hit a woman" were never repeated again after an initial spike overall violence would decrease.
Except for a few rare individuals men generally do not walk around attacking other men (or women for that matter) while, too many women feel safe in hitting men because most men will not reciprocate and even if they do there is likely to be a line of idiotic men willing to physically support her "right" to initiate violence without consequences.

No woman is likely to go throw rocks at a bear anymore than any man is likely to. Because, both know that the bear has no social constraints so it is best left alone unless it actually poses some threat.

This question has been aired on this forum many times, and the answer is the same now as it has been every other time, because nothing has altered since it was first asked.

You walk out, she can change the locks and you lose your home. Or if you manage to get back in, she will hit you again when she feels like it

You use any physical force or restraint whatsoever, you are going to jail.

Stand and take it, you are going to get hurt, nobody will help you and everyone will laugh at you for being a wimp

You are screwed every which way

It's your fault for being born male

Unless of course enough people are outraged enough and active enough to get all that shit changed. It's a long, hard haul because about 99% of both the male and female population believe she has the right to hit you with impunity while you have no right to lift a finger against her no matter what she does, and if you do so you are the violent abuser. Quite a few people who frequent this forum are among the 1% who believe otherwise, and will give you a more constructive and optimistic answer; but that's because quite a few people who frequent this forum are among the 1% whose values and enlightened intelligence are light years ahead of the rest of the blinkered sheep in our society on such matters.

My answer? Do your best to try to re-educate the sheep, and in the meantime don't have anything whatsoever to do with any woman who shows the slightest sign of any propensity towards violence. And certainly don't let her under either your duvet or your roof. Ever.

this actually happened to me !

she threw a lump of concrete at me that caused a contusion on my forum that swelled up like a small hen's egg with copious amounts of blood;

she then proceeded to try and kick me in the balls and punch me with wimyn's style of hitting; I know a no win situation and backed off

my hope at the time was that she didn't fall over or injure herslef cause I would have been arrested for assault !

the onus would have been on me to prove that i didn't assault her - solicitors barristers etc

I went to the police station to report the attack - they just looked at me and asked what the colour of her hair was and a description of her apparel;

the female officer stricken with ennui asked me whether I really wanted to pursue the matter further
I said no and left the station

upon reflection I had a lucky escape from a disaster; I may have lost my home

it would have put me in a position as if I was in the USSR and had struck a commissar

This topic again!

The answer is rather complex as you are faced with a dilemma. If there were no outside factors, the right thing to do would be to defend yourself against any attacker, man, woman or child. But, knowing that a gang of thugs on speed dial will likely come and throw you in a cage and you would lose so much more, it’s best to refrain from defending yourself unless you fear you are going to die.

Heck, I wouldn’t even defend myself against a man if I didn’t feel my life was in danger. Why? Not because it would be immoral to defend myself. Because, generally speaking, when cops show up at that the scene of a fight, unless one person is lying on the ground, they arrest BOTH parties and let the courts sort things out. I want to avoid being arrested, going to jail and going to trial at all costs. So, I would just play possum if someone hit me. I’d fall down and lie there to avoid getting arrested. Plus it would be instant revenge. The motherfucker would be arrested, and I’d go home.

What is this “higher path” people speak of? Some nebulous notion of what is good? And where are these “2 billion non-violent women”? Where are they hiding? Give them a thimble-full of feminism and a fleeting opportunity and they’ll beat you, falsely accuse you, have you arrested, and take everything you’ve got.

In an ideal world, if I were attacked by a woman, I would “celebrate equality”, show her just how “equal” she really was, and bitch slap the “bitch” right out of the bitch. But women have sold their rancid souls in a Faustian deal with the elites to serve as their whip crackers for us men, whom the elites want to keep in line.

The average slave back a couple of centuries ago could have beaten the shit out of his master without any problem. But he knew the system was not in his favor, so he performed his slave labor and submitted to a weaker man. Likewise women today wield the threat of the power of the system against us. It seems to me that we are breeding catatonic men and sociopathic women in this diabolic system we live in.

The simple solution is to have nothing to do with women. Definitely do not live with them, not even female relatives. And use video surveillance to record any encounters with women if possible.

Hell, I was almost killed last year by a psycho woman wielding a knife. Nothing was done to her.

If you must hit a woman to defend yourself, use discretion. Don’t hit her in the face or anywhere else that will bruise easily. Bruises on women = “guilt” on the part of men. Go for the back of the head, cuff her ears, or simply jam your middle finger straight down at the base of her throat at the center of her collar bone, which will force anyone to drop to the ground.

It is very difficult for me to believe that most women would want this stuff to change. In order to support this changing they'd have to support losing some of the advantages they have over men. I honestly doubt the sincerity of most of the women that claim to support us and I make no effort to hide that. I think you're right, the best thing is to have nothing to do with them but we shouldn't even give them mention nor our attention if we truly believe this.

We should only mention them to expose them and in the occasional but rare and I mean very rare case that we come across a woman who is honestly decent we should just treat her like "one of the guys" in the sense that we shouldn't elevate nor lower her.

A slap? Probably nothing but disdain and walk away. An actual attack? End her.

I've taken enough martial arts that self-defense is second nature. My first boyfriend decided that we should spar. He was being playful and doing what guys often do with girls-- physically tease them. I said no love, martial arts aren't for playing around with I was trained for life or death situations... then he kicked at me suddenly (sucker punch!). It was automatic, I had my own shin up to block the kick and was halfway through the adrenaline-fueled movement into a counter-kick before I caught myself-- Wait, there is no danger! You don't need this response! I pulled my counter-kick halfway through but his foot was still bruised black and blue for two weeks and he walked with a limp. I was very sorry but it was completely automatic and he triggered the reflex. Safe to say, he did not throw any unexpected kicks or punches at me again.

I perfectly understand the reasoning for your attack but the only reason there is no negative stigma is because of your sex and his sex.