Thread: Marriage Is Offensive!

Yep, you can't even let kids draw a picture of a 'happy family' any more without some bigot saying a 'happy family' is offensive.


High school paints over portion of student's mural | Turn to 10

She sketched a mural that showed the growth of a boy into adulthood. The last image showed a man with a woman and child and wedding rings over their heads.

<object width="429" height="295"><param name="movie" value="http://vp.mgnetwork.net/viewer.swf?u=4ab8c3aad18d102faba2001ec92a4a0d&z=JA R&embed_player=1" ></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://vp.mgnetwork.net/viewer.swf?u=4ab8c3aad18d102faba2001ec92a4a0d&z=JA R&embed_player=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="429" height="295"></embed></object>

Quote from Marx

Yep, you can't even let kids draw a picture of a 'happy family' any more without some bigot saying a 'happy family' is offensive.


High school paints over portion of student's mural | Turn to 10

<object width="429" height="295"><param name="movie" value="http://vp.mgnetwork.net/viewer.swf?u=4ab8c3aad18d102faba2001ec92a4a0d&z=JA R&embed_player=1" ></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://vp.mgnetwork.net/viewer.swf?u=4ab8c3aad18d102faba2001ec92a4a0d&z=JA R&embed_player=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="429" height="295"></embed></object>

I'd like to know which parents find the mural offensive. But the school district will cave into the special interests of feminists and LGBT movement because their views are soooo much more important that a typical married couple with a child.

I'm offended at the people who find a simple mural offensive. These are they very people that advocate for artwork made out of human feces and menstrual blood to be publicly displayed and yet are offended by a mural depicting a boy's transition into manhood. I'd wager a steak dinner with all the trimmings that if the mural depicted a girl becoming a woman and ending up with a lesbian partner, there would be no controversy.

Quote from Marx

Yep, you can't even let kids draw a picture of a 'happy family' any more without some bigot saying a 'happy family' is offensive.

In other words, the mural was offensive for being normal.
I swear I cannot stand that brainless logic!
It's no different than the pathetic specimens who screech every time they see a male or female sign on the door of a public restroom!

Restroom, tell me about it. I went to a Baseball game last Thursday and watched as women rushed the mens bathroom to take over the stalls because there was a big line at the women's bathroom. Just bullshit all the way around.

Quote from The Possible Human

Restroom, tell me about it. I went to a Baseball game last Thursday and watched as women rushed the mens bathroom to take over the stalls because there was a big line at the women's bathroom. Just bullshit all the way around.

Yeah, they'll invade our privacy in men's restrooms but won't tell other women to hurry the fuck up and piss quickly so as not to hold up the line! And if you so much as peak in their purse, you're accused of invading their privacy. And don't forget that abortion is all about "privacy". Someone needs to take women who walk into men's rooms for any reason and boot them out. Throw a bucket of water or piss on them or something.

I remember someone saying that you can either understand women or love women but not both.

I had a situation where I asked a woman about planned parenthood and before she could answer I already typed what she was going to say. Do you think that was by mere coincidence or that I'm a mind reader? Or could there be a possibility that we know what we're talking about?

Added after 6 minutes:

Quote from Dylan MacVillain

Yeah, they'll invade our privacy in men's restrooms but won't tell other women to hurry the fuck up and piss quickly so as not to hold up the line! And if you so much as peak in their purse, you're accused of invading their privacy. And don't forget that abortion is all about "privacy". Someone needs to take women who walk into men's rooms for any reason and boot them out. Throw a bucket of water or piss on them or something.

Don't people invade enemies they're at war with? How can they be allies when their behavior says otherwise?

A line needs to be drawn in the sand and people should be given enough information and then choose which side they're on. No more would people be able to lie about their allegiances. Either they'd be status quo or against it. Then we'd know who's who and how to deal with them.

We men are told that we are less than manly, even homosexual, if we are not willing to take care of our toilet business in front of strange women. Well, the body parts involved are called "privates" for a reason. We're also told that "Men evolved to display everything to any and all women in order to attract as many sex partners as possible" and similar BS. The utter crap that people make up and spew under the guise of "evolution" blows my mind. "Evolution" is the default explanation for any type of behavior that people can't readily explain or are unwilling to oppose. It's becoming a neo-superstition.

There are certain types of creatures that are deprived of privacy while urinating and defecating:
1) Young children as they need supervision.
2) Prisoners as they must be watched all the time.
3) Animals as they are animals.
4) Slaves as they are property and have no rights.
and
5) Torture victims, such as at Abu Ghraib, as lack of privacy is part of the torture.

Which categories do we men fall in?

If you think about it, there really are no "men's rooms", just "women's rooms" and "men's and optional women's rooms". Women's Rooms exist to afford women privacy from men. "Men's Rooms" also exist to afford women privacy from men if they decide that they want it.

Depriving people of the basic natural need of privacy is abusive. Teaching them to accept it, if not celebrate it, is psychotic.

This world-wide practice of women being automatically granted full privacy from men (restrooms, hotel floors & lounges, clubs, etc.) and full access to any so-called men's domains, meaning men have absolutely no privacy from women, must change. Men must bodly demand and enforce it.

Quote from Dylan MacVillain

We men are told that we are less than manly, even homosexual, if we are not willing to take care of our toilet business in front of strange women. Well, the body parts involved are called "privates" for a reason. We're also told that "Men evolved to display everything to any and all women in order to attract as many sex partners as possible" and similar BS. The utter crap that people make up and spew under the guise of "evolution" blows my mind. "Evolution" is the default explanation for any type behavior that people can't readily explain or are unwilling to oppose. It's becoming a neo-superstition.

The theory of evolution says that everything is getting "better", people are becoming more awesomer........ Nope, don't see it.


Oh, you forgot those who "play"; but they are not really part of society anyway.

Quote from Dylan MacVillain

We men are told that we are less than manly, even homosexual, if we are not willing to take care of our toilet business in front of strange women. Well, the body parts involved are called "privates" for a reason. We're also told that "Men evolved to display everything to any and all women in order to attract as many sex partners as possible" and similar BS. The utter crap that people make up and spew under the guise of "evolution" blows my mind. "Evolution" is the default explanation for any type behavior that people can't readily explain or are unwilling to oppose. It's becoming a neo-superstition.

There are certain types of creatures that are deprived of privacy while urinating and defecating:
1) Young children as they need supervision.
2) Prisoners as they must be watched all the time.
3) Animals as they are animals.
4) Slaves as they are property and have no rights.
and
5) Torture victims, such as at Abu Ghraib, as lack of privacy is part of the torture.

Which categories do we men fall in?

If you think about it, there really are no "men's rooms", just "women's rooms" and "men's and optional women's rooms". Women's Rooms exist to afford women privacy from men. "Men's Rooms" also exist to afford women privacy from men if they decide that they want it.

Depriving people of the basic natural need of privacy is abusive. Teaching them to accept it, if not celebrate it, is psychotic.

This world-wide practice of women being automatically granted full privacy from men (restrooms, hotel floors & lounges, clubs, etc.) and full access to any so-called men's domains, meaning men have absolutely no privacy from women, must change. Men must bodly demand and enforce it.

Men today are like blacks during segregation in the US.

Quote from Dylan MacVillain

The utter crap that people make up and spew under the guise of "evolution" blows my mind.

Evolution is a Hindu doctrine, repackaged as so called “Science” so as to appeal to the average white western male, who does not do religion, as he is far too smart for that.


“It results from this expose that the theory of evolution is impossible..... Evolution is a sort of dogma in which the priests no longer believe, but they maintain for their people.”


Dr. Paul Lemoine, an evolutionist.
__________________________________________________ _________________


I think however that we must go further than this and admit that the only acceptable explanation is Creation.


I know that this is anathema to physicists, as indeed it is to me, but we must not reject a theory that we do not like if the experimental evidence supports it.


H.J. Lipson, F.R.S.A Physicist Looks at Evolution, in Physics Bulletin 31, 1980, Page 138.
__________________________________________________ ________________


What One Famous Scientist Said About Evolution.....
One morning I woke up and something had happened in the night, and it struck me that I had been working on this evolution stuff for twenty years and there was not one thing I knew about it.


That's quite a shock to learn that one can be so misled so long. Either there was something wrong with me or there was some- thing wrong with evolutionary theory.


Naturally, I know there is nothing wrong with me.


The question is: Can you tell me anything you KNOW about Evolution? Any one thing? Any one thing that is true? I tried that question on the geology staff at the Field Museum of Natural History and the only answer I got was SILENCE.


I tried it on the members of the Evolutionary Morphology Seminar in the University of Chicago, a very prestigious body of Evolutionists, and all I got there was silence for a long time, and eventually one person said, “I do know one thing, it ought not to be taught in high school.”


Part of a keynote address given at the American Museum of Natural History by Dr Colin Patterson (Senior Paleontologist, British Museum of Natural History, London) in 1981. Unpublished transcript.

Naturally, I know there is nothing wrong with me.

I'm neither attacking evolution nor defending creation. I don't believe in either. To believe in something, one has to have evidence that it is true. And I'm not going to believe in something by default or because I'm told that there are only two options.

My beef with evolution is that people are just as religiously dogmatic about it as their opponents are about creation, both ideologies are used to control people, and, as I stated before, people superstitiously "explain" everything with evolution. It gets old after a while.

Certainly marriage is offensive -- to men. It is a blatantly misandric institution in a multitude of ways. Yet, men are harangued if they do not wish to marry -- we are expected to sacrifice our freedom and happiness for a woman and her children to-be. Oftentimes women I know will comment that they would like to marry a smart man. I tell them that, unfortunately, they are condemned to marry a stupid man, because only a stupid man would want to get married -- period, not just to them. (Somehow they always take this the wrong way.)

We need to stop caring "how they take it".