Have your say...

When replying, don't forget to review the posting-rules.
Now post your reply to the thread: BBC misandry..

Your Message

Click here to log in

spell "miss andry" correctly

 

Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces)
For further information on trackbacks, see this link.

Additional Options

  • Will turn www.example.com into [URL]http://www.example.com[/URL].

Topic Review (Newest First)

  • 25th-July-2008
    Dr David Banner

    Re: BBC misandry..

    1980s
    "Would you mind awfully not being so beastly to men in your programmes" MRAS


    1990s
    "Stop media bitching about men NOW" MRAS


    2000s
    "We are closing you down - out you go!" MRAs
  • 25th-July-2008
    Celtic Druid

    Re: BBC misandry..

    Quote Quote from 6ame View Post
    And let's not forget the programme they aired an entire series of on BBC 2, remember, men pay for a TV license as well as women, the programme was called "How To Train Your Husband", it was an old woman explaining how to henpeck your husband, it was totally out of order, as they would never have shown a programme that suggested women needed to be "trained".
    I rallied the troops and led the charge back in 2006 regarding this vile show (it finished airing in early oct 05).

    I think our online onslaught protesting this show ensured there wasn't another series (which was planned).

    http://antimisandry.com/showthread.p...=Train+Husband


    http://antimisandry.com/showthread.p...=Train+Husband
  • 16th-July-2008
    Ledburian

    Re: BBC misandry..

    Today Wednesday 16 July 2008

    BBC Radio Five Live discussion on the knife carrying culture in urban Britain and social disorder in many of these urban areas. 09:05 hrs to 13:00hrs but this discussion topic ran for the first hour only. As I was driving I only heard about 40% of the program.

    The hostess of the phone-in program is a female. She has a tendency to support "female causes". She also has a tendency to direct undue hostility towards male callers.

    She had this guy on from some group the name of which I did not catch but as soon as he drifted towards a certain amount of criticism directed at women in British society by stating reasons as to why, in his opinion, women hold a substantial amount of responsibility for the breakdown of family life in the UK and with predictable results vis a vis social disorder, she immediately began to change her attitude towards him by becoming quite aggressive, so much so that she terminated the slot with the guy sooner than would otherwise have been the case.

    This is such a common trait among the Feminazi.....as soon as they get cornered they immediately become hostile and aggressive, and instead of discussing the issues calmly and with decorum in reasoned argument, they resort to the same old tactics of either hurling insults or twisting things round in such a way as to make it appear as if the "breakdown" is all the fault of the party challenging them, and the whole thing descends into a farcical showdown with noting to show at the end of it.

    About two callers later another call came on, a male, who berated her for terminating her chat with the group representative, and said that he, too, believed whole heartedly that women far and away bear the greater reponsibility for much of the social disorder in the UK, and that the earlier speaker had spoken a lot of sense and that she should invite hiom back on the program.

    Her only response to this caller? "No way!" and she immediately cut him off.

    ALL COURTESY OF THE GRAND AND GLORIOUS BBC.
  • 16th-July-2008
    Exposing Feminism

    Re: BBC misandry..

    Quote Quote from celtish View Post
    the expressions "reverse sexism"
    and "reverse racism" are inanities. What they
    are talking about is perhaps negative discrimination
    In reality, there is no such thing as positive, negative or reverse discrimination. All these things have the word discrimination in common. We do not need constructed prefixes to validate the its use. Neither do we particularly need to overuse the word itself - I discriminate against certain kinds of breakfast cereal, is that wrong?

    Here is the definition of the word diversity from http://dictionary.reference.com ;-

    1.the state or fact of being diverse; difference; unlikeness. 2.variety; multiformity. 3.a point of difference.

    Simply put, 'different'. Nothing about race, colour or creed. Why then does this word have such associations? Does a person of colour consider themself to be 'different'?

    'Different' from what?

    All of this language manipulation is a tool of socialism, and hence feminism. We already have the words 'sexist' and 'racist' which can be universely applied to all, yet still words and phrases are created which insinuate that the the blame for both belongs to one entity - the white heterosexual male.

    I think that this phenomenon should be addressed by all in the Men's Rights Movement.
  • 16th-July-2008
    celtish

    Re: BBC misandry..

    6game: (1) Yes, you have been replicated! Thanks!
    http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question...5140103AAM6jCy
    (2) And yes, the expressions "reverse sexism"
    and "reverse racism" are inanities. What they
    are talking about is perhaps negative discrimination

    Percy: I fully agree. Has feminism wrecked the telly series 'Dr Who'? I think it has. 'Dr Who' used to be a great sci-fi series at one time but over the past couple of years it has degenerated into mediocrity. Would you join me in petitioning the BBC to not bring it back onto our screens.
  • 16th-July-2008
    6ame

    Re: BBC misandry..

    Quote Quote from celtish View Post
    This misandry is prevalent in BBC dramas and soaps. To take just one example, in Eastenders the way one of the characters on that show was basically hailed as a "heroine" for smacking her husband in the face with an iron was absolutely sickening. Her character was called "Little Moe" (the "Little" added to her victim status, of course) and her husband was abusive (as in "shouted at her" abusive).

    BBC News always advertise BBC shows by talking about them for days, and the way it is done can be truly annoying. "He deserved it", they said. "He had it coming" they said. And of course they would have said those same things about a female character who was struck in the face with an iron for shouting at her partner, wouldn't they?
    Hey, that was me that wrote that, did you put that on another website?

    On the subject of reverse racism, I asked this question in May: http://qna.live.com/ShowQuestion.asp...F5DDCB24FE5547
    I also disagree with the term, it insinuates that sexism and racism are one way streets.
  • 16th-July-2008
    Percy

    Re: BBC misandry..

    I am fortunate in not having the BBC in Oz. We have the ABC which is just as bad though and we get a lot of BBC productions.

    One of the saddest programs, for me, is Dr Who. What a farce it has decending into. Every episode now has a pushy, nasty, smart-arse 'assistant' who cannot help but spout agitprop. It is Time for the Doctor to hose out the friggin' Tardis.
  • 16th-July-2008
    Marx

    Re: BBC misandry..

    Quote Quote from celtish View Post
    And of course they would have said those same things about a female character who was struck in the face with an iron for shouting at her partner, wouldn't they?
    Absolutely correct. The British Bias Corporation certainly has a lot to answer for with it's constant bashing of men, justifying female violence and the like.
  • 15th-July-2008
    celtish

    Re: BBC misandry..

    Equalism is as opposed to misandry as it is to misogyny

    The entire BBC is so misandrist you wouldn't believe it if it wasn't so plain and obvious. You can even hear the occasional snide anti-men comments on some of the voiceovers when advertising forthcoming programmes.

    This misandry is prevalent in BBC dramas and soaps. To take just one example, in Eastenders the way one of the characters on that show was basically hailed as a "heroine" for smacking her husband in the face with an iron was absolutely sickening. Her character was called "Little Moe" (the "Little" added to her victim status, of course) and her husband was abusive (as in "shouted at her" abusive).

    BBC News always advertise BBC shows by talking about them for days, and the way it is done can be truly annoying. "He deserved it", they said. "He had it coming" they said. And of course they would have said those same things about a female character who was struck in the face with an iron for shouting at her partner, wouldn't they? Wouldn't they?

    http://www.celticsurf.net/phpBB3/vie...=2&t=115&p=452
  • 15th-July-2008
    Exposing Feminism

    Re: BBC misandry..

    Brian44,
    I am sorry that you find me patronising.

    I would prefer it that we were on the same side on this one, but with regard to your previous statement and in view of your keenness for clarity, I wonder if you could elaborate on a few points (emphasis mine) ?

    Quote Quote from brian44 View Post
    I only use the term out of habit for clarity, because, trust me, for most people, racism and sexism is just one way traffic. I've been talking to people about this since the early 80's and in those days racism and sexism could only be perpetrated by one gender and one race.
    You seem to be assuming that you are a better authority than I in matters of racism and sexism since the 80's. How can this be, since you have no idea of my sex, ethnicity or age?

    Can you give examples to justify the statement above , which seems to be alleging that sexism and racism is mostly perpretated by white men?

    I would be very interested to hear your views on this.

    E F
  • 15th-July-2008
    brian44

    Re: BBC misandry..

    Quote Quote from Exposing Feminism View Post
    I can't say that I agree with your reasoning here Brian44, but I respect your right to use language as you see fit. However, I do think that it is important that men are aware of the effects of deliberate language manipulation for political means.

    There is an interesting article about it here.

    In fraternity,
    E F
    I must say I find you extremely patronising. My reasoning is simply to not want to be misunderstood. If I assume everyone understands what I'm saying when they don't, it's pretty much a waste of time, wouldn't you say? I am not trying to manipulate language, I'm trying to de-manipulate it in a practical way. When everyone lives in your utopia I'll happily drop the use of that phrase.
  • 15th-July-2008
    Exposing Feminism

    Re: BBC misandry..

    Quote Quote from brian44 View Post
    I only use the term out of habit for clarity, because, trust me, for most people, racism and sexism is just one way traffic. I've been talking to people about this since the early 80's and in those days racism and sexism could only be perpetrated by one gender and one race. So I've developed the habit over the last two and a half decades. Even these days I often have to use the term to make myself clear. So in an ideal world these phrases would not be needed, but I think I will need them for some time yet.
    I can't say that I agree with your reasoning here Brian44, but I respect your right to use language as you see fit. However, I do think that it is important that men are aware of the effects of deliberate language manipulation for political means.

    There is an interesting article about it here.

    In fraternity,
    E F
  • 15th-July-2008
    brian44

    Re: BBC misandry..

    Quote Quote from Ledburian View Post
    The entire BBC now runs according to Feminits rules and agendas.

    End of.

    Tune in sometime and see for yourself.
    No worries, I've seen and heard for myself. I'm thinking of just watching the news and sport from now on as most drama (and the advertising in between) just makes me feel depressed or angry. Come to think of it, even documentaries irritate me with a) the way they rewrite history from a feminist perspective and b) how they do everything they can to interview female experts, even if there was only one in a team of two dozen or more. It gives the impression that most science is being done by women. It seems the women have to get the glory and exposure.
  • 15th-July-2008
    brian44

    Re: BBC misandry..

    Quote Quote from Exposing Feminism View Post
    Hi Brian44,

    In actual fact there is no such thing as 'reverse sexism' any more than there is such a thing as 'reverse racism' - these clumsy phrases have been purposely constructed to convey political thought - in this case, the idea that it is usually white men who are sexist and/or racist.

    We refer to this here as 'Cultural Marxism' . Cultural Marxism can be seen as a decendent of 'Critical Theory' , a communist devised political science designed to influence public opinion.

    I hope you don't mind me pulling you up on this!

    Yours in fraternity,
    E F
    I only use the term out of habit for clarity, because, trust me, for most people, racism and sexism is just one way traffic. I've been talking to people about this since the early 80's and in those days racism and sexism could only be perpetrated by one gender and one race. So I've developed the habit over the last two and a half decades. Even these days I often have to use the term to make myself clear. So in an ideal world these phrases would not be needed, but I think I will need them for some time yet.
  • 15th-July-2008
    Exposing Feminism

    Re: BBC misandry..

    Quote Quote from brian44 View Post
    I hate them too. Every single drama they produce is a reverse sexist, man hating, piece of garbage.
    Hi Brian44,

    In actual fact there is no such thing as 'reverse sexism' any more than there is such a thing as 'reverse racism' - these clumsy phrases have been purposely constructed to convey political thought - in this case, the idea that it is usually white men who are sexist and/or racist.

    We refer to this here as 'Cultural Marxism' . Cultural Marxism can be seen as a decendent of 'Critical Theory' , a communist devised political science designed to influence public opinion.

    I hope you don't mind me pulling you up on this!

    Yours in fraternity,
    E F
  • 14th-July-2008
    Ledburian

    Re: BBC misandry..

    The BBC......Radio 4

    Tune in between 19:00 -19:15hrs Sunday to Friday evenings.
    Repeats 14:00 -14:15hrs Monday to Friday
    Omnibus edition: Sunday 10:00 - 11:15hrs

    Program: THE ARCHERS
    The world's longest running radio soap opera.
    The program was the brainchild of a MALE and the first episode was broadcast in January 1951
    Basically the story was meant to be about a farming family and life in a small village in the Englsh country side. In other words "An Everyday Story of country Folk"
    Scripts written my MALES
    Producer and Directors were MALES
    Storylines were basically related to the average life of farming people, involving normal working and leisure issues of such people in rural England....some happy, some sad, as in all lives.

    The prgram has continued to run and looks set to un until the end of time, BUT.............................slowly but steadily the WOMEN began to take over the whole show.......the original MALE scriptwriters either retired or died off, as did the producers and directors, and in recent years the males were replaced by WIMMIN, and I mean WIMMIN, as more and more they changed the whole tenor of the program and more and more the storylines took on very strong feminits themes, and small as this mythical village of AMBRIDGE is supposed to be the new FEMALE writers brought in a whole range of really stupid story lines, and involving practically every kind of social, politically correct issue under God's sun.

    Male characters were gradually replaced by female characters - from the vicar, to the lawyer, to the doctor, to the vet and to company bosses....women took over, and step by step those male characters who remained were, step by step, increasingly portrayed as either flawed in some way, or adulterous, or just plain stupid, or inadequate, or a cheat, or a liar, or a loser of some kind, and even a rapist in one case. And in another case a man in his 80s is portrayed as a "difficult case of Alzheimers prone to outrageously unpredictable and confusing behaviour" - he is seen as a great trial for his wife, and all the sympathy is heaped on her not him, the real sufferer.

    Even a baby BOY of just 2 years is seen made out to be a "selfish self seeking little brat".

    Meanwhile, this strange village is full of unselfish, virtuous, industrious, long suffering (due to male behaviour) victimised WOMEN, in which [practically every episode shows them suffering from the actions of all the "idiot" males making their lives to "difficult".

    The entire BBC now runs according to Feminits rules and agendas.

    End of.

    Tune in sometime and see for yourself.
  • 14th-July-2008
    brian44

    Re: BBC misandry..

    Quote Quote from 6ame View Post
    I hate the BBC, and haven't ever paid for my TV license, my TV works fine without it, they can whistle for the money, I don't pay to be painted as a violent moron who deserves to be mistreated, I'd sooner give my money to a bunch of man-hating lesbians than I would the BBC, oh wait, they're the same thing.
    I hate them too. Every single drama they produce is a reverse sexist, man hating, piece of garbage. There's even a formula they follow: each drama should include a strong, morally superior, woman; a member of at least one ethnic minority (if a man, he will be weaker than the woman but stronger than any white men, or will at least be morally superior to them); and finally at least one very weak or weak/evil white man. Even if it wasn't so outrageously unjust and hypocritiical, it's just so bloody BORING.
  • 14th-July-2008
    6ame

    Re: BBC misandry..

    The BBC are VERY guilty of blatant misandry.

    A few instances, all BBC, come to mind.

    One time, on BBC breakfast news, they had a woman on promoting her charity, which was specifically for women with lung cancer. First of all, this was clearly discriminatory against men, so shouldn't have been promoted in the first place, paid for by the license money, half of which comes from men. Secondly, this woman was not challenged once when she stated "Sure, it's sad when a family loses a father to lung cancer, but it's even more devastating for a family to lose a mother to lung cancer, which is why I set up my charity". Utterly despicable that this trollop was ever given air time.

    Just a few weeks ago, they had a report about domestic violence, I posted a thread about it here: http://antimisandry.com/more_dv_bs-t11521.html
    While discussing it, they had a huge poster in the background of a woman curled up in fear (of who I wonder?), and they had 2 women on to talk about it, one was from a women against violence campaign, the other was a domestic violence victim who claimed she didn't have enough "confidence" to leave. Absolutely no mention whatsoever of women being violent in relationships, they were totally painted as the victim, when the violent person was mentioned, it was always him/his/he, totally disgraceful.

    It was probably about 5 years ago, but they done a report about how boys were doing better in schools, and it was reported in a way that suggested that something should be done to help the girls match the boys.
    Fast forward a few years, and it's the opposite way around, the girls are now smarter, but they don't report it the same, it's reported more in a way that suggests that girls are just better than boys, not a mention of helping the boys catch up, it was all reported in a celebratory fashion, sickening.

    And let's not forget the programme they aired an entire series of on BBC 2, remember, men pay for a TV license as well as women, the programme was called "How To Train Your Husband", it was an old woman explaining how to henpeck your husband, it was totally out of order, as they would never have shown a programme that suggested women needed to be "trained".

    I know Eastenders is only a soap opera, but the way one of the characters on that show was basically hailed as a heroine for smacking her husband in the face with an iron, knocking him out, was absolutely sickening. Her character was called "Little Moe", the "Little" added to her victim status, and her husband was abusive, as in "shouted at her" abusive.
    It was always on the news as the story went on for days, and BBC news always advertise BBC shows by talking about them, but the way it was done was truly annoying, "he deserved it" they said, "he had it coming" they said, and of course they would have said those same things about a female character who was struck with an iron for shouting at her partner, wouldn't they?

    I hate the BBC, and haven't ever paid for my TV license, my TV works fine without it, they can whistle for the money, I don't pay to be painted as a violent moron who deserves to be mistreated, I'd sooner give my money to a bunch of man-hating lesbians than I would the BBC, oh wait, they're the same thing.
  • 14th-July-2008
    brian44

    Re: BBC misandry..

    part of a comment from Chris from the bbc link:
    Surely this is the very antithesis of equality? This situation as proposed by the BBC merely represents a reversal in "traditional" gender roles and as such reflects the problems that women faced with equality some 20-30 years ago, but this time it is being imposed upon men.
    I don't actually think there ever was a time when men proposed that women were redundant and worthless. There was never institutional hatred of women, they were always loved and valued. What men are going through is completely different.
  • 14th-July-2008
    brian44

    Re: BBC misandry..aa

    Quote Quote from Dr David Banner View Post
    Yep
    ExposingFeminism -misandry in the BBC
    You will find plenty of it in their archives.
    The phenomenal suicide rate of men in the uk imust surely connected to the general misandry and hostility to men? This theme of men being redundant is born from real and deep hatred it pervades the media in much of it output
    Yes, the BBC, Hollywood and all other media are killing men at worst and helping to destroy the prospects of a generation of boys at the very least (gang culture being just one manifestation).

    Quote Quote from Dr David Banner View Post
    Lets be plain about it the media have been to the fore in promoting misandry. Imagine a programme or "Are Women no longer needed? "a book titled
    "Are women necessary?"
    No even putting forward such a fascistic question - it just would not have entered my head . Morally I feel bound from even responding in similar kind because its irrational not to say downright EVIL!
    The American media feminist Maureen O Dowd has no such moral qualms and has a book out "Are men necessary?"
    This is why I so long for the day when the artificial womb and the shaggable, beautiful, female android arrive: just so that women will understand at last what redundancy feels like and how men have felt for decades: UNNECESSARY

    Quote Quote from Dr David Banner View Post
    I note one comment mentioned the deep seated desire many women seem to have to dominate men. I have noticed the bossy tendencies in too many women and I find them utterly tiresome. I just walk away without responding. Such women are a dime a dozen in the media where attention seeking reigns supreme.

    Avoid these ike the plague because they get very vindictive when thy dont get their own way and in the workplace - guess who gets the blame in any conflict.
    Women are so aggressive these days. Even just walking in a crowded street they expect you to totally make way for them. None of this 'I'll move a bit and you move a bit and we'll pass without coliding' nonsense. You have to totally make way for her, even if she marches out of a shop without really looking you have to duck out of her way, because she's a superior being right? Just like drinking pints and not being able to cook are political, feminist, statements, so too is automatically disrespecting men.
  • 14th-July-2008
    xavier

    Re: BBC misandry..

    I thought this quote out of the comments for the programme was so good I'd archive it here:-

    The stark truth is that war isn't fought between the sexes - it is between armies. Ask the Tutsis, ask the Croatians, ask the victims of Pol Pot or Hitler.
    Like it or not the main factor that determines the survival of your genes is how good your men are at fighting wars - and that depends upon how readily philosophy/religion or shared paranoia binds men and women together in a common purpose.
    The battle between the sexes is a side-show, an entertainment that has been made possible by the surplus wealth that has been the product of the stability that has been derived from the long term military success of the liberal West. If you give enough people enough money, they will fight over anything - or even nothing.
    Most of the world's population are struggling to acquire the basic things in life - and the most important of those is security, not sexual equality.
    Mark Thomas, Redhill
  • 12th-March-2008
    Celtic Druid

    Re: BBC misandry..

    It's ironic how not only the supplanted ideologically-driven media origins of feminism took an insidious root - in the fertile corrupted regions of media -- The BBC. But we the public, began, or rather was forced to pay for their middle class arrogant political petulance of thought irregardless - of personal choice.

    Ironically feminists in (1914-15) unleashed several bombs outside of the now BBC (as then!), alongside conducting over 200+ acts of treason, arson (several royal palace fires) and a conspiracy to murder the then prime minister Herbert Asquith!!!!!!

    Genuine Misandry is synonymous (fashionable) with the very constructed disgusted essence that flows "unchallenged" throughout the 'vibrant' rat-runs of the ideologically-driven - misandric - western - media.

    As an aside from this, I'd like to set up a public misandry vs misogyny debate. With this firstly, more importantly - we will introduce the words misandry, misandric and misandrist to the world.

    Until now, feminists, appeasers and the weak willed have inadvertently moulded literary political existence to greater extents. That is, until concepts of male hatred are accepted and "defined" across society, these words will remain an alien language in society and therefore misunderstood.Time for some influential change that will introduce these well 'overdue' - "politically pregnant" - definitions!
  • 9th-March-2008
    bobx23456

    Re: BBC misandry..aa

    Quote Quote from Ledburian View Post
    So do I .....but not before I have chucked the contents of my wine glass into their faces before I storm off!

    The entire BBC is so misandrist you wouldn't believe it if it wasn't so plain and obvious. You even hear the occasional snide anti male comments from some of the continuity announcers when advertising forthcoming programs.

    The Archers is on the BBC - say no more!

    Yep, BBC is as misandrist as CBS, NBC, CNN, and FOX

    Blessings

    Bob
  • 9th-March-2008
    Ledburian

    Re: BBC misandry..aa

    Quote Quote from Dr David Banner View Post
    Yep
    ExposingFeminism -misandry in the BBC
    I have noticed the bossy tendencies in too many women and I find them utterly tiresome. I just walk away without responding.
    So do I .....but not before I have chucked the contents of my wine glass into their faces before I storm off!

    The entire BBC is so misandrist you wouldn't believe it if it wasn't so plain and obvious. You even hear the occasional snide anti male comments from some of the continuity announcers when advertising forthcoming programs.

    The Archers is on the BBC - say no more!
  • 9th-March-2008
    Dr David Banner

    Re: BBC misandry..

    We must all repond, immediately. Its an easy one. Just ask, loudly (so everyone around hears), "Would you say that about Jews or Abos? Bigotry is bigotry, it doesn't matter which group is the target of your ignorant hate-speech. So fuck off"

    LOL ...
    Percy I will keep that in mind....I am like my logo very very mild mannered.
    I am not afraid of any women .What I do fear is my temper which is very bad.
    Thats why I walk away.
    "making a woman feel threatened" in my staff manual is enough to get you sacked. No mention of men of course. I will have to work on the above but with controled anger. YTou are right we should challenge bigoted statements.


    More BBC misandry here "The Future is Female" well well RIP BBC cuase I dont know how the f*** they think their shabby outfit will be run by women only.Not to mention all the disaffected men out there who may have other plans.The articles like these have a strong whiff of junk "science" (I hesitate to denigrate the mighty word science as such) about them:


    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6518241.stm

    note the folowing setence too:
    "Although men do work in roles requiring such interpersonal skills, they are dominated by women."

    Had the job in question been mostly staffed by men the femibeeb would describe it as "male dominated"
  • 9th-March-2008
    Percy

    Re: BBC misandry..

    I just walk away without responding.
    I feel like that sometimes, but then my dander rises and I won't.

    We must all repond, immediately. Its an easy one. Just ask, loudly (so everyone around hears), "Would you say that about Jews or Abos? Bigotry is bigotry, it doesn't matter which group is the target of your ignorant hate-speech. So fuck off".
  • 8th-March-2008
    Dr David Banner

    Re: BBC misandry..aa

    Yep
    ExposingFeminism -misandry in the BBC
    You will find plenty of it in their archives.
    The phenomenal suicide rate of men in the uk imust surely connected to the general misandry and hostility to men? This theme of men being redundant is born from real and deep hatred it pervades the media in much of it output

    Lets be plain about it the media have been to the fore in promoting misandry. Imagine a programme or "Are Women no longer needed? "a book titled
    "Are women necessary?"
    No even putting forward such a fascistic question - it just would not have entered my head . Morally I feel bound from even responding in similar kind because its irrational not to say downright EVIL!
    The American media feminist Maureen O Dowd has no such moral qualms and has a book out "Are men necessary?"
    I note one comment mentioned the deep seated desire many women seem to have to dominate men. I have noticed the bossy tendencies in too many women and I find them utterly tiresome. I just walk away without responding. Such women are a dime a dozen in the media where attention seeking reigns supreme.

    Avoid these ike the plague because they get very vindictive when thy dont get their own way and in the workplace - guess who gets the blame in any conflict.

    This idea is very prevalent in the feminist dominated media - that men are "surplus to requirements"
    Very bad karma . I really avoid hate speech like this Why because I am firmly of the belief that what goes around comes around. We gentlemen are now used to all this cast a cold eye on it all and be on your way let the media rot. Dont be around them. Leave them to it.
    For they willl look around some day soon and find it is they who are redundant....amidst whatever cosmic tragedy the next few decades must surely witness.
  • 7th-March-2008
    bobx23456

    Re: BBC misandry..

    Quote Quote from Exposing Feminism View Post
    OK, so I'm just searching for some evidence of misandry at the BBC to prove a point in a discussion I'm having, and I appear to have hit paydirt..

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/if/3545831.stm

    It's astonishing that an institution that is legally required to be politically impartial can get away with this garbage.


    DEFINITION

    impartial: --> Supporting the Politically Correct agenda and platform.
  • 7th-March-2008
    Exposing Feminism

    BBC misandry..

    OK, so I'm just searching for some evidence of misandry at the BBC to prove a point in a discussion I'm having, and I appear to have hit paydirt..

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/if/3545831.stm

    It's astonishing that an institution that is legally required to be politically impartial can get away with this garbage.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
1e2 Forum