the wimyn actually believe their cossetted preeminient life styles at the expenses of men is ok ! the scroll list in the second video is absolutely true as I have observed it live or experienced it direct

Excellent vid.

Amazing how many American-speaking females are at LSE.

This is a chap who could well do with Paul Elam's $1000 support. I am happy to send him $25. (My pension does not go far enough for more, I'm afraid).

Anyone else?

Tom Martin is a hero.

Great video. Great project.

What did he mean on the list by "clip joints" luring men in and abusing them?

Some other areas of discrimination to add to that superb list are the existence of women's univesities (S. Korea is full of them) and nudist colonies (from what I've read on their sites) often only allowing couples or single women, no single men.

Regarding sexist language, the term "manhunt" used to refer to the search for an unknown suspect should be "personhunt" until the suspect's identity is known. It is just assumed that the perpetrator of a crime would be a man, so women and manginas are not concerned about that sexist term. Whereas, the term "pointman", one created at the expense of men's lives in combat, has been changed to "pointperson" to make women feel better though they in no way contributed to the blood, sweat, tears and toil behind the concept or term.

There's also the concept of the "drunk uncle, the pedophile". No one ever talks about the "drunk aunt, the pedophile". I guess I can start!

I was channel surfing the other night and caught part of the film Gone With The Wind. In one scene, after a battle, the field is covered with thousands of men, dying or dead, and one doctor is trying to tend to them all. Then along comes this woman who's concerned about another woman who is giving birth. The concerned friend actually expects the doctor to leave thousands of dying men to tend to the needs of one woman. She actually expects that to happen. She showed no regard for the poor dying men (men defending women). She didn't even take a second to offer a compassionate glance around. The poor doctor had to actually take time away from his patients to explain that childbirth is a normal procedure that she could deal with and that he wouldn't abandon all those wounded men for one woman in labor!


I have decided from now on to offer minimal tips to waitresses and maximum tips to waiters in order to help offset the difference in earnings.

Quote from Dylan MacVillain

Regarding sexist language, the terms "manhunt" used to refere to the search for an unknown suspect should be "personhunt" until the suspect's identity is known. It is just assumed that the perpetrator of a crime would be a man, so women and manginas are not concerned about that sexist term. Whereas, the term "pointman", one created at the expense of men's lives in combat, has been changed to "pointperson" to make women feel better though they in no way contributed to the blood, sweat, tears and toil behind the concept or term.

'Gunman' is another term that was conveniently overlooked when PC zealots decided to 'cleanse' the language. Whenever the opportunity arises, I use the term 'father nature' as a small gesture against the sexist 'mother nature'.

Quote from Percy

I am happy to send him $25. (My pension does not go far enough for more, I'm afraid). Anyone else?

Yes, I gladly sent a few shillings !!!

Quote from Dylan MacVillain

I have decided from now on to offer minimal tips to waitresses and maximum tips to waiters in order to help offset the difference in earnings.

I like it !!!

Excellent video - well done Rob

And yes, Percy, I would also donate money to help him fight.

UPDATE. I went onto his sexism busters .org and making a donation was easy thanks to the fact he uses paypal. He is fighting a worthwhile cause and has a good chance of winning his case

Remember people don't just donate money. Please also click "like" below the video, it really makes a difference and will get the video far more views.

This video is of such a high quality that we need to go to town on this. Post a topic on Tom's case on as many other forums as you know and link to the video. Email it to people in your address book, perhaps it could even go on the front page on anti misandry please?

There is also a 'like' button on the top (left side) of this very thread. Clicking 'like' on this page will show up on your facebook and invite your friends to see it here, drawing attention to misandry in general AND the video, both in one fell swoop.

I noticed that Tom's campaign has also had some media exposure, The Guardian has written an article about his issue

When Martin began unnerving the blinkered worldview of some of these women, it reminded me of the priest in 'The Exorcist' when he performed an exorcism on the demonically possessed Linda Blair. I was just waiting for their heads to start spinning and projectile vomiting.

From 3:10 on the video, the blonde woman:

Either way ... [men's and women's pay] hasn't been equal for years and years and that's what we're studying...

And right there is the very problem!

They are studying falsities and sexist lies.

Perhaps these people should instead be studying the law, where they'd learn that the Equal Pay Act has been around for almost all working women's lives and that men and women get paid by law the same for doing the same job.

Good for you, Tom Martin, keep going.

[QUOTE=Douglas;275864] Perhaps these people should instead be studying the law, where they'd learn that the Equal Pay Act has been around for almost all working women's lives and that men and women get paid by law the same for doing the same job.
QUOTE]

A great point - I had forgotten about the equal pay act.

Why don't gender students in universities know basic facts? - Yahoo! Answers

Why don't gender students in universities know basic facts?

Please go to Youtube homepage and search the below term

"Tom Martin sues Gender Institute for teaching sexism"

Then click the top video which should be just under 10 minutes in length.

or add this to the end of youtube home page /watch?v=6y9_oklmHvU

At about 3:00 a student admits to not knowing that women make different choices in work which ultimately affects wage differences between men & women.

At 3:30, students are asked a simple question "Tell me about inequalities women face?" and instead of an answer, the interviewer is met with hostilities and aggression (from man-loving feminist students who don't hate men).

At 4:10 a young student is asked a simple question about the vote and becomes hostile rather than answering his question - she openly admits she does not know the answer when pressed to simply answer the question instead of attacking him.

At 4:45 the same woman claims "There is NO DISCRIMINATION against men, I'm sorry there is just no discrimination at all."

The same student later (8:20) claims that fighting to raise awareness that men also have to face discrimination is just 'stupid'.

Towards the end of the video the interviewer finds people who are more able to discuss rationally (i.e. not shouting at him).

AT 6:06 a young student tells us she is from India and this is why she wants to see Universities focusing on women's issues alone and ignoring men's issues. Remember, India is the country where they have female-only train-cabs and one man was thrown off such a moving-carriage and died due to this apparently non-existent sexism against men in her home-country.

At 6:10 a students tells us that she is an expert on DV. She then admits that she simply isn't going to talk about DV (as victims) with men - demonstrating her own bigotry. By 6:40 she is asked a simple question to which she admits, "I know nothing" despite only moments prior claiming to be an expert on DV.


So.. how can feminists of this site who have in the past denied that academia is indoctrination maintain their lies when the evidence is given directly by some of the students of LSE's gender-studies class reactions to being asked simple questions about men and men's rights?

ps - please remember the legal team defending LSE have openly stated they DO DISCRIMINATE against men but they feel it is justified (just as many of the above students did).

The first feminist to respond to my question denied that feminists on YA had ever denied that there had ever been any denial from feminists LOL

Huh? Have "feminists" on this site had a raging argument over academia at all? I missed it, if so.