Here are six videos from the YouTube channel TheNoNonsenseMan:

Marc Rudov Says Boycott Valentine's Day!


Rudov & O'Reilly Debate Maternity Fraud


Brits Love to Hit Men


Female Violence Against Men in England


Female Violence Against Men in South Africa


Will She Buy YOU Dinner?

http://www.TheNoNonsenseman.com

Marc@thenononsenseman.com

Rudov is a feminist.

He seeks moderation between the sexual roles. He believes men and women have interchangeable roles in life. Giving space to feminism through moderation is forfeiture, and I reject any measure of that.

That would make him a Mangina. No way! I've seen him on The O'Reilly Factor, and I subscribe to his newsletter. Screw the gold-diggers; Valentine's Day is a rip-off; Personal ads are laughable traps. These do not reflect a conciliatory approach to gender relations.

Here, here!!

Rudov is no feminist or mangina. His whole bit is about insisting women accept the equality they can't seem to stop whining about.

Like it or not, things have changed, and men need to realize the longing for the days of being "leaders" in their homes, or anywhere else, are gone. It's flat earth bullshit that leads men right to family courts to get raped.

I will repeat:
He seeks moderation between the sexual roles. He believes men and women have interchangeable roles in life. Giving space to feminism through moderation is forfeiture.

If the above does not set off red lights for you, and you think that "times" change the gender roles, then we can agree to disagree. To me, he is a compromiser and a feminist.

I watched several youtube videos of him. He takes no absolute stand of roles between men and women. Even his vocal tone is concilatory. No thanks. He claims his childhood education of mom being at home was reprehensible... something he learned to hate while he was in college! Sorry guys, he's got no foundation. Some good words, and he's no wimp, but he's nobody I will pattern after.

_____________________________________

With all due respect, you are judging him unfairly. He has to modify his stance to mollify the media moguls that could (and would) deny him access to the airwaves in a NewYork nanosecond. The role-model you endorse would not have his own radio show and would not be invited to prime time television shows. At least e-mail him, before you render a thumbs-down verdict.

That is compromise with the feminist media. Same answer. I will not uplift people who water-down their stance to please feminists or their tools.

OK, I will email the man. Maybe he will change my mind. I will give him that much.

____________________________________

May I recommend you subscribe to his regular email notices.

He's left Bill O'Reilly singing the Mangina National Anthem ... "Well, I'M
secure in MY masculinity!" (Whatever that's supposed to mean!)

He makes better arguments that I'm more in favour of than the feminists. In general though I'm not so fond of his idea of equality, I don't think that gender roles should be identical. Both feminism and 'equalism' (whatever it is called) corrodes the sexes; feminism corrodes the male sex and 'equalism' corrodes both sexes.