If gays and lesbians are offended by dads then dads should be offended by gays and lesbians. Does "mom" offend them? I thought so.

Removing the word "Dad" offends me, so put it back in !!!!

This is blatant misandry. they are subtly saying they don't want dads... they could easily put father/second parent if they wanted to.

It's just boggles the mind at the depth the PC types and feminist/lesbian cadres will plumb to enforce their vision on the rest of the world.

Quote from The Possible Human

It's just boggles the mind at the depth the PC types and feminist/lesbian cadres will plumb to enforce their vision on the rest of the world.

They seem to think that removing any mention of the word "father" or "dad" or "male worker bee" or something will result in an end to the institution of fatherhood. My new argument on this is that men who marry good women, stay married, and raise children are giving their children a huge evolutionary advantage. Big government has done everything possible to try to minimize this advantage, but no matter how big the checks get, no ammount of money replaces the presence of a father in the household, something which I notice every time I look into the beautiful, perfectly nourished faces of my daughters. If I'm correct, this means that a father's worth cannot be measured in dollars, and so becomes priceless.

Ultimately, if I'm correct, evolution will not be kind to the children of single parents. Children raised in stable, two-parent families will easily outpace children raised by single-parents, and this experiment in feminist exclusivity will topple like the house of cards that it is.

Perhaps in the not too distant future, they will begin employing feminist-approved men to attend daily in-house sessions with single-mother children. Their title could be something like "male role-model professional" or suchlike.

Quote from Marx

Perhaps in the not too distant future, they will begin employing feminist-approved men to attend daily in-house sessions with single-mother children. Their title could be something like "male role-model professional" or suchlike.

You know, I wouldn't put it passed feminists to endorse an idea like this, if only to further expand the size of government. But what will happen when they go on strike...?

What do you think step fathers are? Femistate and mother approved blokes who are convientely unrelated to the child and therefore far less likely to want to battle the state system on behalf of the kids in the father-removal program..

Straight men of all races are the ones who have built society, not women and not gay men. Of course, women and homosexual men have contributed, but the bulk, meaning the most significant contributions of labor, organization, and inventions have come from straight men. Destroy us and you destroy civilization. That's the point. That's what "they" want.

At one point in time, homosexuals were deemed to be psychotic. When they pull bullshit like this, they do indeed seem to be insane. They are not making any friends in the heterosexual community by treating us like this. Nothing pisses me off more than hypocrisy. For a group of people that has been bitching and whining for respect and tolerance to be so disrespectful and intolerant is beyond words. I feel like removing them from my vocabulary.

It's interesting that while the gay/lesbian movement has shown itself to be an ally to feminists, that we still talk about befriending the gays.

Now, they have effectively declared war on heterosexual men who are, have been or may become fathers in the future. I remember getting banned from SYG for expressing my views that gays are NOT our allies. It's a battle I no longer care to fight but I am going to mention it here because it's the topic.

I was asked last night if Rolph Harris (the man with the dodgy digeridoo) was gay..

You know, I couldn't care less if he is or isnt..

It doesnt have to be rammed in your face..

What sort of people push their personal sexual agenda in folks faces in some attempt to popularise the dirty deeds they do?

No need for it really, personal choice..

Now if they can kindly fuck off and leave us to our own lifestyles and prefferences and quit compromising ourselves to accomodate their "hurt feelings" in petty ways it might be nice..

Quote from Dylan MacVillain

Straight men of all races are the ones who have built society, not women and not gay men. Of course, women and homosexual men have contributed, but the bulk, meaning the most significant contributions of labor, organization, and inventions have come from straight men. Destroy us and you destroy civilization. That's the point. That's what "they" want.

At one point in time, homosexuals were deemed to be psychotic. When they pull bullshit like this, they do indeed seem to be insane. They are not making any friends in the heterosexual community by treating us like this. Nothing pisses me off more than hypocrisy. For a group of people that has been bitching and whining for respect and tolerance to be so disrespectful and intolerant is beyond words. I feel like removing them from my vocabulary.

It is often those who scream for tolerance that are the most intolerant. It isn't uncommon to see people called bigots if they don't approve of publicized homosexuality. I see it this way and I fuckin swear I don't want to argue this point with anyone: Babies come from men and women and that is why heterosexuality should be considered superior (by society) to homosexuality. Dick and Dick, Jane and Jane don't make new taxpayers and that is a concern for any society.

My personal view is, leave me alone and fuck anyone you want but they aren't leaving me alone are they?

Maybe we should fuck them all but not sexually.

Quote from Popadibs

Maybe we should fuck them all but not sexually.

Hey, NAGALT!