The idea is to write a comprehensive article about how Radical Feminists have worsened society.

How they created a rift, distrust between men and women with their hysterical laws.

Also highlight why "normal" feminists should not condone the radical feminists and stop their destructive actions. This would promote the creation of a rift and split up feminism as these radical feminists (feminazis) would be jettisoned.
It's to convince "regular" feminists to stop supporting radical feminists.

Who'd like to help?

I would like to help, on behalf of the Protectorate.

I am the Administrator for the 'Protectorate Alliance', the first public venture of the 'Protectorate', an organisation currently engaged in covertly investigating and gathering evidence on the horrific crime of PPA. PPA is perhaps the darkest secret of the radical-feminist/pro-matriarchy movement. This crime is enacted against men by women, behind closed doors, apparently unbeknown to the establishment's law enforcement and social workers. There is evidence that PPA has been carried out against males in society since the Victorian era.

The 'Protectorate' could no longer stand to maintain complete silence, to build a powerbase covertly in the shadows, whilst behind closed doors, thousands of men across the world are tortured on a daily basis.

And thus the 'Protectorate Alliance' was born. Created to help spread the word. To help society to become aware of PPA, on order for society to condemn it and flush its perpetrators from their hiding places.

The 'Protectorate Alliance' seeks to create a coalition of online groups. The 'Protectorate' itself cannot go public and all operatives must remain anonymous. The Protectorate needs time to grow. I cannot reveal my identity, for fear of drawing the wroth of the Matriarchal movement.

There is no point trying to find out my identity or anyone else from the Protectorate who you might talk to online. All email accounts are anonymous, set up specifically for this endeavour. Trace the email accounts and you might find yourself in one of the many internet cafes in the UK.

I have been instructed to provide any interested party or individuals, unless you are of course the opposition, with a general overview, nature of the crimes, names of known perpetrators, websites used by them, known establishments inflicting this crime and addresses, victim accounts etc.

Please I beg of you, join the 'Protectorate Alliance' and help the Protectorate to end this secretive crime.

As I write and as you read it, there is an extreme possibility that somewhere out there, a young boy, a young man, even a middle aged man or an old man may be being subjected to PPA at the hands of a Matriarch.

Help the Protectorate to end the torture. A torture few know of.

I hope you will be able to utilise the information I have to offer, on behalf of the 'Protectorate', in a manner that will be detrimental to the Matriarchal movement. Once general society uncovers PPA for themselves, something hidden from society for more than a century. Once general society sees in this horrific crime, sees in the perpetrators, the unflinchingly dark side of Matriarchal women then society will turn on them. Will wage social war against them and all shall see the horror of the Matriarchy.

Anything any of you need of the Protectorate. Just ask. Spread the word in society. Some of you may think you have seen the worst the Matriarchy, the radical feminists, the man-haters can do. But until you've learned of PPA, and the horrific psychological kidnap of the lives of boys and men for decades. Then you have very little idea of how horrific a matriarchy would be.

I hope that together we can spread the word and bring an end to this torture of men.
And in doing so, cripple the Matriarchy.

What exactly is 'PPA'?

the theme could be the creation of the peonage slave nation of trashed fathers at the behest of the feminit Family Court - being neither a court nor for the family;

and the rise of the nation of misandrist queer of misandrist wimyn ever ready to legally dump more itemised malice on the heads of sincere fathers, hopefully to gaol them

"Protectorate Alliance" Communique. [In 2 parts]

Introduction:

PART 1

The crime is known as 'Petticoat Punishment'/'Petticoat Discipline'. Also 'Diaper Discipline'/Diaper Humiliation'. I term these under the heading of 'Petticoat Punishment Abuse' (or PPA).

The aim of these crimes is to completely humiliate the male so that he loses all masculinity and becomes completely submissive to the females in his lives.

It happens to men of all ages. From young boys to teenagers, youths to middle aged and young men. There are even cases where a man has been subject to this sadistic crime his entire life, being brought under its regime as a young boy all the way up to adulthood and is then forced into a marriage with wife who will continue the regime.

Being stripped of all masculinity leaves a man unable to fight the power so to speak.

Note: PPA victims should not be confused with males who actually want to do it, who willingly subjected themselves to it in the very beginning, and therein the women who give these males what they want. Also the Protectorate has mixed views on how to help those men who have been utterly broken by it to the point where they could not do without it, though I personally would like to think that no one is beyond salvation.

How PPA works is a male will be forced to dress as a girl/wear makeup/dress as a baby/or some or all of these things. This could be as a young boy by a mother "For his own good" or by a wife etc to bring an unruly husband under her control. (It is a common tale that a wife will trick her husband into donning feminine attire or baby clothes during love making as a form or sexual role-play and unbeknown to the husband the wife will take photos of him while dressed thus. Later in the cold light of day the wife will present copies of the photos to the husband and threaten to show them to his friends and work colleagues if he does not agree to dress up like a girl/baby at the wife's every whim. In this situation I believe a man should refuse and brave the initial humiliation and embarrassment at work and from his friends and try to wing it. Unfortunately this doesn't happen a lot of the time and the man agrees to his wife's demands and is thus utterly screwed for the rest of his life).

Note: In the case of many who are subject to PPA by their mothers, aunts, sisters, wives etc the Protectorate has considered that many of these women consider their actions to be ones of discipline. At first. Initially, certainly a consistent pattern is seen of women who do it to with discipline in their minds. However, reading the legitimate accounts of victims and perpetrators alike it is only too apparent and made obvious that in almost all cases (and trust me this is happening on a pretty large scale behind closed doors) after the initial intent to discipline the male, the perpetrators take on an intense pleasure in humiliating the male in this way, so that it is no longer about discipline but about getting some sick pleasure form their, son's/brother's/nephew's/husband's pain and humiliation.

Though many many women will try and convince themselves and others that discipline is the primary reason for their actions and that they are completely morally and legally justified in punishing the men in their lives in this way.

[Note: No member of the Protectorate was ever a victim of PPA. This is not about revenge on behalf of a tormented member. The Protectorate was eventually formed after a period of intense research done by a single individual who came across this sick crime quite by accident. Just thought I'd mention this so you don't go thinking that I or any associate of mine has chosen to combat this crime as a personal vengeance crusade. The Protectorate has chosen to fight this because those of us who have enjoyed lives free from this sordid crime which essentially is a form of psychological suppression of part or the entirety of a man's life. I personally would not think it an exaggeration to term PPA as being a form of kidnapping. Preventing a man from living his life in freedom. A PPA household is following a totalitarian regime. The perpetrators are "Fascists" in the generalised sense of the word.]

But I digress.

As I was saying, the Protectorate's research has seen a consistent pattern in the motives of the perpetrators of PPA, whereby it is clear that the women involved get a strong feeling of pleasure from humiliating men with PPA. Indeed often they are unsure about carrying it out until a friend persuades them to the point where they think "It's be fun" rather than "This is the discipline he needs".

(e.g Here is an extract from a real-life account of baby humiliation of a husband by a wife: "Then we told him some ladies were coming to see him, and thoroughly enjoyed his panic and desparate pleading until the door bell rang. I shall never forget how he cringed and turned scarlet as the women gathered around, admiring his clothes, and telling him what a pretty baby he was. Then we all settled down to watch the girls have some fun with him.")

In the accounts it is clearly evident that many women have lost control of their senses and keep on in the belief that what they are doing is right and just, when any individual or is not lying through their teeth to themselves and possesses an ounce of understanding of justice and common humanity will be horrified by the actions of these women.

Indeed it was the accounts of such women and the excuses they gave that led the Protectorate to discover the link between PPA and the Matriarchy movement. There is becoming an increasing amount of women who justify their PPA crimes on the grounds that women are superior, that it is their given right to subject men to PPA, that it is in fact their duty to do this, in order to create a better world. A world ruled by women.

Many of the women involved in PPA have a very biased one-sided opinion of the world: e.g they state: "if petticoating in the family were a lot more prevalent, then it would be of great benefit to all members of society" and ""From then to this day he as never worn any male clothing which has made him a much better person. I have no doubt my mother made the correct choice."

it is all one-sided. They refuse to entertain the notion that a man could lead a good life simply by being a man. They have a very sexist view of men in general.

"even in a punitive hierarchy, the male is inferior."/"Certainly boys...are, as you point out, naturally inferior to girls in most respects."

As such these women are able to justify their crusade against men in society.


I will now give some real-life examples of the excuses and reasons given by women for their actions (if you would like examples to explain any of the above please let me know and I will find the relevant files and get them to you) in order to demonstrate the levels of sheer arrogance and twisting of morals that a female PPA perpetrator comes to possess in the course of her crimes:

- "II am not a dominatrix or anything as idiotic as that, I am simply somebody who wants domestic life to be happy and stress-free. A household where the husband is happily submissive"

- "Under loving but uncompromising petticoat government, our men will be happier, more relaxed, of more use about the house, and much more considerate and better mannered towards women and girls."

- "____'s behaviour has driven me to take this action, although I freely admit that I can’t wait to have ____ dressed as my little girl."

- "the possibilities of achieving total feminine domination of the country. It is only by reducing men to second class citizens that we
shall really achieve satisfaction... Women need only join together once for long enough to
take control of government and the rest follows---men are disenfranchised, money may only be inherited by a woman, all males
must he registered as the property of women, without whose consent they may not enter into legally binding agreements---the
possibilities are endless.

In my own home the ideal of complete matriarchal rule is an established fact. My husband was a widower with two children
when we married. During our honeymoon I quickly taught him that sex was a privilege to be earned, and to earn it meant total
submission and absolute obedience. Five years later he is now a model of perfection---his salary is paid directly into my
account. Each evening he carries out his allotted housework---all of which I make him do. The result of all this is a happy, secure family under proper feminine dominance. I do not allow my husband much sexual activity
as this is the 'carrot' for which he must strive. Susan is growing up into a dominant young lady, and John seems to think that if
he tries hard enough he may even achieve feminine status!

Yours sincerely,

L.B., Gwent."

[scary stuff is it not?]


PART 2

But it isn't just women that agree with PPA some men do, albeit 'Janegirls' (sissy men) as they are known and while they are entitled to have opinions such as this:

"I am in full agreement with your philosophy of petticoating boys. Masculine aggression seems to be the root of so many problems in the world and I believe the feminizing of boys at an early age, or even later in life, would do much to cure these ills."

they have no right to promote PPA's covert implementation behind closed doors and have no right to wish onto others."

In a similar fashion those men who have been subject to PPA to the point where they could not live any other way, do not have the right to speak out against masculinity given that they cannot recall it. I have masculinity AND I have studied the lives of these men and live in a social structure where I am free to make a rational analysis and I find freedom of expression to be the better of the two. Freedom to be who I want to be rather than being one of these poor souls who have the ability to argue and fight their corner stripped from them.
=====================================

Next I will display some real-life examples of the victims' cries of anguish over the torment they underwent or undergo:

- "I am reluctantly writing to you on the orders of my wife, I am 29 years old, slim build, my wife is 26, blonde, tall and very good looking. She is also very dominant: we have been married for three years and in that time she has become the boss, I must confess that it is my own fault, being rather weak willed, and she has taken the dominant role in all things.

I reckon things would have gone on normally but for a silly mistake of mine. I took her sister out one night, she is twenty, and when I took her home, for a bit of fun I dressed up in her clothes, we both had a good laugh, and that was that, or so I thought, but as it turned out I was very much mistaken. She told my wife all about that night, and on returning home from work four days later, I was confronted by the two of them. My wife was furious, she gave me a choice, take the punishment she would hand out, or have all my friends told about that night. I had no choice but to take whatever punishment she thought fit.

The worst time is when they have their girlfriends around, I am mocked and ridiculed no end, they always insist that since it is all girls together, that I go around in my bra, knickers, suspenders, and stockings only, I am ridiculed for wearing suspenders and stockings, as they all wear tights, they think it is hilarious that I am forced to wear suspenders, they also make great fun of my knickers, they all wear very small briefs while I am made to wear frilly feminine panties, they say that I look like something out of the 1950's.

This then is my lot, and I am stuck with it until my wife calls a halt, I hope this may be of interest to your readers.
Yours truly,

P.S.S., Middx."

- "Quite a number of ladies have written to you, gloatingly telling how, for some imagined offence or other, they have punished their husbands in nappies and baby dresses, and even, in some cases, exposed them dressed like this to other women. And I wonder if these women, as they describe the pretty baby frocks and frilly undies that their unfortunate spouses are made to wear, ever stop to think of the agonies of shame and humiliation that any man must feel in such a terrible position.

As one who has been, and still is, frequently subjected to such cruel humiliations, I can assure them that it is harder to bear than physical pain, and that the mere thought of being put into my nappies, and my ridiculous hated baby dress makes me feel ill with disgust and shame.
...Of course 'Baby' must use a dummy and have a feeding bottle, and since I cannot resist at all, I have to let them nurse me and feed me, and woe betide if I struggle at all, or do not take my bottle properly. Actual baby formula is used, which is so sweet and sickly that it is almost undrinkable, and, to prolong the misery for me, the teat has only a very tiny hole, so feeding can take half an hour or more. I have to wear a bib so that I shan't dribble on my frilly frock, and when they are feeding me they usually wear large rubber aprons themselves.

The minute the feed has been finished, my dummy is pushed back into my mouth and, because at times in sheer frustration I have refused to take it, it is now tied in place with a ribbon threaded through the ring, and tied in a bow at the back of my neck. 'Baby would cwy ', they tell me, 'if he didn't have his dummy teat!' And I can do nothing to stop them.

So, you dominating wives who get so much pleasure from putting your unfortunate husbands into nappies and baby clothes, please listen to one who knows just what the misery and humiliation of such treatment is like, and set them free from their shameful babydom. No woman could know, or possibly imagine for one moment, what it feels like to lie helpless in nappies, and to be subjected to all the miseries and indignities of being a baby again, and it is a fate which no man should have to suffer if you have the least regard for him at all.
Yours sincerely,

J.L.
Bath."

- ""I did escape from Auntie's rule at last, but that was only temporary, as three years later I was forced into marriage by the daughter of one of her friends, and the torments of enforced babydom began all over again, and are still continuing. But that is for another letter. Yours truly,
'Baby Brian'"

- "Basil was 19...Of course there were struggles and protests, but I am well able to cope with such things, and they soon changed to pitiful sobbing and pleading...I had him in my care for a month and during that time he was subjected to every indignity and humiliation that I could devise for him...At the end of the month, when I returned him to his mother, he was a thoroughly chastened and obedient child but, although he is now 23, she still puts him back into nappies and baby dress whenever he misbehaves. He has recently become engaged to a girl of his own age, who knows all about his situation and is fully in favour of such treatment, so it looks as though he faces a lifetime of petticoat and nappy servitude."

- "She then looked down at me, and smiled as she commented on my freshly wet diapers. She again reminded me of why I had been punished, and threatened worse if I ever acted badly again. I was then sent to the bathroom to remove the diapers and take a bath. Though I felt better at the ordeal being over, it was many weeks before the other kids stopped making fun of me. I think that was why I became such a loner and kept to myself from that day on."


====================================
PPA is a crime. PPA is illegal. PPA is horrific.

PPA destroys lives.

"Protectorate Alliance" Communique. [In 2 parts]

Introduction:

PART 1

The crime is known as 'Petticoat Punishment'/'Petticoat Discipline'. Also 'Diaper Discipline'/Diaper Humiliation'. I term these under the heading of 'Petticoat Punishment Abuse' (or PPA).

The aim of these crimes is to completely humiliate the male so that he loses all masculinity and becomes completely submissive to the females in his lives.

It happens to men of all ages. From young boys to teenagers, youths to middle aged and young men. There are even cases where a man has been subject to this sadistic crime his entire life, being brought under its regime as a young boy all the way up to adulthood and is then forced into a marriage with wife who will continue the regime.

Being stripped of all masculinity leaves a man unable to fight the power so to speak.

Note: PPA victims should not be confused with males who actually want to do it, who willingly subjected themselves to it in the very beginning, and therein the women who give these males what they want. Also the Protectorate has mixed views on how to help those men who have been utterly broken by it to the point where they could not do without it, though I personally would like to think that no one is beyond salvation.

How PPA works is a male will be forced to dress as a girl/wear makeup/dress as a baby/or some or all of these things. This could be as a young boy by a mother "For his own good" or by a wife etc to bring an unruly husband under her control. (It is a common tale that a wife will trick her husband into donning feminine attire or baby clothes during love making as a form or sexual role-play and unbeknown to the husband the wife will take photos of him while dressed thus. Later in the cold light of day the wife will present copies of the photos to the husband and threaten to show them to his friends and work colleagues if he does not agree to dress up like a girl/baby at the wife's every whim. In this situation I believe a man should refuse and brave the initial humiliation and embarrassment at work and from his friends and try to wing it. Unfortunately this doesn't happen a lot of the time and the man agrees to his wife's demands and is thus utterly screwed for the rest of his life).

Note: In the case of many who are subject to PPA by their mothers, aunts, sisters, wives etc the Protectorate has considered that many of these women consider their actions to be ones of discipline. At first. Initially, certainly a consistent pattern is seen of women who do it to with discipline in their minds. However, reading the legitimate accounts of victims and perpetrators alike it is only too apparent and made obvious that in almost all cases (and trust me this is happening on a pretty large scale behind closed doors) after the initial intent to discipline the male, the perpetrators take on an intense pleasure in humiliating the male in this way, so that it is no longer about discipline but about getting some sick pleasure form their, son's/brother's/nephew's/husband's pain and humiliation.

Though many many women will try and convince themselves and others that discipline is the primary reason for their actions and that they are completely morally and legally justified in punishing the men in their lives in this way.

[Note: No member of the Protectorate was ever a victim of PPA. This is not about revenge on behalf of a tormented member. The Protectorate was eventually formed after a period of intense research done by a single individual who came across this sick crime quite by accident. Just thought I'd mention this so you don't go thinking that I or any associate of mine has chosen to combat this crime as a personal vengeance crusade. The Protectorate has chosen to fight this because those of us who have enjoyed lives free from this sordid crime which essentially is a form of psychological suppression of part or the entirety of a man's life. I personally would not think it an exaggeration to term PPA as being a form of kidnapping. Preventing a man from living his life in freedom. A PPA household is following a totalitarian regime. The perpetrators are "Fascists" in the generalised sense of the word.]

But I digress.

As I was saying, the Protectorate's research has seen a consistent pattern in the motives of the perpetrators of PPA, whereby it is clear that the women involved get a strong feeling of pleasure from humiliating men with PPA. Indeed often they are unsure about carrying it out until a friend persuades them to the point where they think "It's be fun" rather than "This is the discipline he needs".

(e.g Here is an extract from a real-life account of baby humiliation of a husband by a wife: "Then we told him some ladies were coming to see him, and thoroughly enjoyed his panic and desparate pleading until the door bell rang. I shall never forget how he cringed and turned scarlet as the women gathered around, admiring his clothes, and telling him what a pretty baby he was. Then we all settled down to watch the girls have some fun with him.")

In the accounts it is clearly evident that many women have lost control of their senses and keep on in the belief that what they are doing is right and just, when any individual or is not lying through their teeth to themselves and possesses an ounce of understanding of justice and common humanity will be horrified by the actions of these women.

Indeed it was the accounts of such women and the excuses they gave that led the Protectorate to discover the link between PPA and the Matriarchy movement. There is becoming an increasing amount of women who justify their PPA crimes on the grounds that women are superior, that it is their given right to subject men to PPA, that it is in fact their duty to do this, in order to create a better world. A world ruled by women.

Many of the women involved in PPA have a very biased one-sided opinion of the world: e.g they state: "if petticoating in the family were a lot more prevalent, then it would be of great benefit to all members of society" and ""From then to this day he as never worn any male clothing which has made him a much better person. I have no doubt my mother made the correct choice."

it is all one-sided. They refuse to entertain the notion that a man could lead a good life simply by being a man. They have a very sexist view of men in general.

"even in a punitive hierarchy, the male is inferior."/"Certainly boys...are, as you point out, naturally inferior to girls in most respects."

As such these women are able to justify their crusade against men in society.


I will now give some real-life examples of the excuses and reasons given by women for their actions (if you would like examples to explain any of the above please let me know and I will find the relevant files and get them to you) in order to demonstrate the levels of sheer arrogance and twisting of morals that a female PPA perpetrator comes to possess in the course of her crimes:

- "II am not a dominatrix or anything as idiotic as that, I am simply somebody who wants domestic life to be happy and stress-free. A household where the husband is happily submissive"

- "Under loving but uncompromising petticoat government, our men will be happier, more relaxed, of more use about the house, and much more considerate and better mannered towards women and girls."

- "____'s behaviour has driven me to take this action, although I freely admit that I can’t wait to have ____ dressed as my little girl."

- "the possibilities of achieving total feminine domination of the country. It is only by reducing men to second class citizens that we
shall really achieve satisfaction... Women need only join together once for long enough to
take control of government and the rest follows---men are disenfranchised, money may only be inherited by a woman, all males
must he registered as the property of women, without whose consent they may not enter into legally binding agreements---the
possibilities are endless.

In my own home the ideal of complete matriarchal rule is an established fact. My husband was a widower with two children
when we married. During our honeymoon I quickly taught him that sex was a privilege to be earned, and to earn it meant total
submission and absolute obedience. Five years later he is now a model of perfection---his salary is paid directly into my
account. Each evening he carries out his allotted housework---all of which I make him do. The result of all this is a happy, secure family under proper feminine dominance. I do not allow my husband much sexual activity
as this is the 'carrot' for which he must strive. Susan is growing up into a dominant young lady, and John seems to think that if
he tries hard enough he may even achieve feminine status!

Yours sincerely,

L.B., Gwent."

[scary stuff is it not?]


PART 2

But it isn't just women that agree with PPA some men do, albeit 'Janegirls' (sissy men) as they are known and while they are entitled to have opinions such as this:

"I am in full agreement with your philosophy of petticoating boys. Masculine aggression seems to be the root of so many problems in the world and I believe the feminizing of boys at an early age, or even later in life, would do much to cure these ills."

they have no right to promote PPA's covert implementation behind closed doors and have no right to wish onto others."

In a similar fashion those men who have been subject to PPA to the point where they could not live any other way, do not have the right to speak out against masculinity given that they cannot recall it. I have masculinity AND I have studied the lives of these men and live in a social structure where I am free to make a rational analysis and I find freedom of expression to be the better of the two. Freedom to be who I want to be rather than being one of these poor souls who have the ability to argue and fight their corner stripped from them.
=====================================

Next I will display some real-life examples of the victims' cries of anguish over the torment they underwent or undergo:

- "I am reluctantly writing to you on the orders of my wife, I am 29 years old, slim build, my wife is 26, blonde, tall and very good looking. She is also very dominant: we have been married for three years and in that time she has become the boss, I must confess that it is my own fault, being rather weak willed, and she has taken the dominant role in all things.

I reckon things would have gone on normally but for a silly mistake of mine. I took her sister out one night, she is twenty, and when I took her home, for a bit of fun I dressed up in her clothes, we both had a good laugh, and that was that, or so I thought, but as it turned out I was very much mistaken. She told my wife all about that night, and on returning home from work four days later, I was confronted by the two of them. My wife was furious, she gave me a choice, take the punishment she would hand out, or have all my friends told about that night. I had no choice but to take whatever punishment she thought fit.

The worst time is when they have their girlfriends around, I am mocked and ridiculed no end, they always insist that since it is all girls together, that I go around in my bra, knickers, suspenders, and stockings only, I am ridiculed for wearing suspenders and stockings, as they all wear tights, they think it is hilarious that I am forced to wear suspenders, they also make great fun of my knickers, they all wear very small briefs while I am made to wear frilly feminine panties, they say that I look like something out of the 1950's.

This then is my lot, and I am stuck with it until my wife calls a halt, I hope this may be of interest to your readers.
Yours truly,

P.S.S., Middx."

- "Quite a number of ladies have written to you, gloatingly telling how, for some imagined offence or other, they have punished their husbands in nappies and baby dresses, and even, in some cases, exposed them dressed like this to other women. And I wonder if these women, as they describe the pretty baby frocks and frilly undies that their unfortunate spouses are made to wear, ever stop to think of the agonies of shame and humiliation that any man must feel in such a terrible position.

As one who has been, and still is, frequently subjected to such cruel humiliations, I can assure them that it is harder to bear than physical pain, and that the mere thought of being put into my nappies, and my ridiculous hated baby dress makes me feel ill with disgust and shame.
...Of course 'Baby' must use a dummy and have a feeding bottle, and since I cannot resist at all, I have to let them nurse me and feed me, and woe betide if I struggle at all, or do not take my bottle properly. Actual baby formula is used, which is so sweet and sickly that it is almost undrinkable, and, to prolong the misery for me, the teat has only a very tiny hole, so feeding can take half an hour or more. I have to wear a bib so that I shan't dribble on my frilly frock, and when they are feeding me they usually wear large rubber aprons themselves.

The minute the feed has been finished, my dummy is pushed back into my mouth and, because at times in sheer frustration I have refused to take it, it is now tied in place with a ribbon threaded through the ring, and tied in a bow at the back of my neck. 'Baby would cwy ', they tell me, 'if he didn't have his dummy teat!' And I can do nothing to stop them.

So, you dominating wives who get so much pleasure from putting your unfortunate husbands into nappies and baby clothes, please listen to one who knows just what the misery and humiliation of such treatment is like, and set them free from their shameful babydom. No woman could know, or possibly imagine for one moment, what it feels like to lie helpless in nappies, and to be subjected to all the miseries and indignities of being a baby again, and it is a fate which no man should have to suffer if you have the least regard for him at all.
Yours sincerely,

J.L.
Bath."

- ""I did escape from Auntie's rule at last, but that was only temporary, as three years later I was forced into marriage by the daughter of one of her friends, and the torments of enforced babydom began all over again, and are still continuing. But that is for another letter. Yours truly,
'Baby Brian'"

- "Basil was 19...Of course there were struggles and protests, but I am well able to cope with such things, and they soon changed to pitiful sobbing and pleading...I had him in my care for a month and during that time he was subjected to every indignity and humiliation that I could devise for him...At the end of the month, when I returned him to his mother, he was a thoroughly chastened and obedient child but, although he is now 23, she still puts him back into nappies and baby dress whenever he misbehaves. He has recently become engaged to a girl of his own age, who knows all about his situation and is fully in favour of such treatment, so it looks as though he faces a lifetime of petticoat and nappy servitude."

- "She then looked down at me, and smiled as she commented on my freshly wet diapers. She again reminded me of why I had been punished, and threatened worse if I ever acted badly again. I was then sent to the bathroom to remove the diapers and take a bath. Though I felt better at the ordeal being over, it was many weeks before the other kids stopped making fun of me. I think that was why I became such a loner and kept to myself from that day on."


====================================
PPA is a crime. PPA is illegal. PPA is horrific.

PPA destroys lives.

The investigative branch of the 'Protectorate' currently involved in the investigation of the radical feminist/Matriarchal movement, with specific focus on the secret crimes of the movement, is on the lookout for allies to distribute evidence of the Matriarchy's hidden crimes to, under the umbrella of the 'Protectorate Alliance'. This information is not widely known. And is likely to shock you.

For more information see the

'PROTECTORATE ALLIANCE' Facebook Group

at

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=298393628052

Help us to end the secret torture of thousands of men across the globe.

thank you for your time and consideration,

'Protectorate Alliance' Administrator.