Blog over @ WIMN online has a short blog article about the terms “Rape” and “Sexual Assault” over the term “Having Sex”.
The problem with “Rape” or “Sexual Assault” is the automatic prejudice they put in a jury. They put the jury in a mode to find a defendant guilty before the trial starts.
We want fair trials for all genders, so the term “Having Sex” is often used. “Having Sex” is true in disputes where a person disagrees after, its up to the jury to decide if its rape. I find that to be a fair trade off, until you are found guilty of Rape, you shouldn’t be labeled.
If you want to find out more about Non-Consensual Sex for College students, check out whynotask.org


More...

I thought rape was the use of a vagina for the purpose that it was intended, i.e. having a chunk of grisley manmeat shoved up it?

As opposed to what women do, the old salmon fingers and plastic willy lark..

Silly me, so for all these years I have been deluding myself into think I am a rapist when I was simply having sex..

But women cannot ever give consent surely?

Lets face it, the patriarchs have confused them so much that they can really know what they are doing?

That site is seriously fucking sick..

Looks like they on a campiagn to criminalise normal masculinity and encourage sluts to take the piss..

This sort of anti-male shit can only lead to..

More rape..

Stupid fuckwits!!