Gunner
Established Member

There are men's issues and then there are men with issues. Fighting against misandry is fighting against problems that affect men because we are men. Homosexual men, for instance, are more concerned with the homosexual agenda than they are with misandry, most of the time. Just because one wishes to oppose injustices against men as a whole doesn't mean they wish to protect every man in every circumstance from the repercussions of every stupid decision they make. Some men aren't fit to take a...

Okies, Douglas.. I seem to have not set permission as I'd thought I had. I'll get on it.

Indeed, this is far beyond discipline. Far beyond.

The abuser was smiling and laughing whilst dishing out violence upon children with a weapon. And feminists insist women are the more moral of the two sexes?

It's hidden from public view, only admins should see it.

Once the snowball erupts feminists will do what they always do - pretend they've always supported & included male victims. More lies. They'll point to a small handful of blogger-feminists who once or twice gave a passing reference to male victims whilst ignoring the endless reams of feminist-funded 'studies' that 'proved' male victims were too small to concern themselves with.

Some people.. I wonder if a man's name would be withheld from the media?

She took on job as a comedian?

Yep

Now, now, gents.. let's not make it personal.

If you have one, try a different browser, such as Firefox or Chrome. You can also try pinging the URL or it's IP address. The site is there.

mens rights help forum • Portal Works for me.. It could be a DNS issue. DNS resolving can take a few days from one server to another.

Greetings Lesbianon, I think you'd do well to post in the introductions forum :) Introduce Yourself

Welcome, great to have you on-board :)

About time too. Feminists have often complained that using the word 'men' in titles excludes women, yet they seem happy to have 'women' in titles at the exclusion of men, such as VAWA and the like. Still, I'm glad to see some of the less hateful groups realising the potential of inviting men into their inner-circles.

It sure does seem that way, sadly.

Most feminists? Most women don't seem to have a problem with it neither out of selfishness and most men don't seem to have a problem with it out of ignorance or stupidity.

Why? Because feminists enabled the sponge-system, is why. Most feminists are happy to see men financially ruined while women take the majority of money without having lifted a finger to earn even 10% of it - but some, very few indeed, are observant that such ludicrous mechanisms are not only destroying men's goodwill towards women but turning many quite hateful. Feminism promotes misogyny.

I have no issue with being pleasant with a member of the opposite sex as long as that member of the opposite sex isn't unpleasant towards me or men because we're men. It's not much different than how I regard members of the same sex. Every generation has their screw ups, not just the young. I'm just pointing out that the feminism older generations allowed to grow plays a role in the relationship breakdown between the sexes today. Chivalry is the code of etiquette that misandrous women rely...

Exactly, they don't deserve special treatment and a lot of them aren't respectful towards men anyway. White knights aren't invincible, though, attack back.

Simple Women shouldn't be treated any better than men unless their attitudes, behavior, conduct and demeanor is better than that of men's. Women shouldn't be treated any worse than men unless their attitudes, behavior, conduct and demeanor is worse than that of men's. Women shouldn't be treated with decency just because they're women but because of their merit. Women shouldn't be treated with indecency just because they're women but because of their assholery towards others, in our...

I've often wondered what would happen if all MEN across the globe went on strike for a day, a week, a month, a year... What would women do to entice us to get back to work, outside of a 'sex-strike'?

This post offends my sensibilities. I've reported it to the admins for review & deletion. :baby:

Phew, thank you, Outdoors, for that double-check. It's possible a glitch caused concern.

If every woman is different then their experiences with some women does not make them have a connection with other women. They are generalizing women based on a few experiences! They're not any different in that regard except y'all like their generalizations better. These men can only share a connection with women, including women they don't know, if to some extent, women are generally the same. So are women all individuals who shouldn't be generalized as a group or when you've experienced...

This isn't really the perfect place to say this due to the nature of this thread but in response to your post: What did men honestly think would happen when they perpetually placed women's needs before their own? Did they not think everyone else would follow suit? Did men underestimate how far placing women's needs ahead of men's would go? Or did men fail to think about their needs at all? Of course their cancers would be prioritized ahead of our cancers when we place their sensibilities...

Treating women with dignity, in and of itself, isn't a bad thing. Treating women with dignity who continually disrespect you is a terrible thing. That they are women makes it no better.