A Knackered Old Knight.
RIP Thomas Ball
Long standing member
Style & coordination Administration
Female teachers tend to mark boys lower than they deserve and boys were less likely to work hard in their classes, the researchers found.
A gender gap favoring girls -- visible in the fourth grade -- grows worse with each passing year.
I am blaming "the system" for this because we shouldn't be blaming young male students for the difficulties they face in what is arguably an increasingly female-programmed educational culture.
Had Enough Therapy?: Why Are Boys Failing at School?
Where Did All the Male Teachers Go? France Worries That Boy Students May Be Suffering
Mumsnet :Promoting Hate, Bigotry and Bias..
I did spend some time last year perusing the "Mumsnet" site and was sickened by the malice and male hate stated on that site. The automatic vitriolic responses to my comment, even though very rational and unassuming, were responded to in ways that were totally unacceptable and were a direct assault on the site's policies, but were ignored. It was akin to the same vitriol and venom expressed on the RadFem Hub, just as sick and just as obnoxious and abusive. That feminastie site is definitely due for a shakeup and it is time that those sexist, male bashing sites started applying their own policies of fairness instead of fomenting hate and ignoring the obvious male bashing diatribe those haters have always indulged in..
Mumsnet on Facebook..
DSC Development and Hosting
Client Story: Mumsnet
Fathers 4 Justice Stage Naked Mumsnet Protest in Marks & Spencer Oxford Street
London branch of Marks & Spencer at Marble Arch, Oxford Street.
Group founder Matt O'Connor was arrested during the weekend protest, which criticised the high street store for its advertising on parenting blog site Mumsnet.
Along with four other members of the group, O'Connor took off his clothes in the store to draw attention to what F4J claimed was Mumsnet's "anti-male agenda".
He claimed that the protest was just the start of a series of attacks on M&S in order to draw attention to the "naked truth" that Mumsnet "promotes gender hatred".
He told IB Times UK: "We discovered some horrific content on the Mumsnet forums, including calling men fascists and equating fathers with Ku Klux Klan members.So it is understandable that the Fathers4Justice movement faced up to that site's sexism, hate and discrimination. In a letter addressed to the CEO of the Mumsnet site, the Fathers4Justice Campaign Manager explains precisely what those nasty members on that site get up to and needless to say it is precisely what I witnessed as well. The entire site has been overrun by male haters as this letter states..
The following is our response to your 10 point statement about Fathers4Justice and gender hatred on Mumsnet. We are disappointed that this dispute has escalated over the last week and that Mumsnet has chosen not to resolve this matter.
As soon as we were made aware of the offensive anti-male discrimination on the Mumsnet website, we brought this matter to your attention in the appropriate manner.
We asked you to remove the offending content and commit to a zero-tolerance policy on gender hatred. We also offered to write a piece for Mumsnet outlining what Fathers4Justice actually campaigns and stands for, rather than the misrepresentation of F4J often portrayed on Mumsnet as well as to highlight the fact that F4J is run by a woman.
Instead of responding in a respectful and professional manner, you made flippant and derisory comments about me (a mother of two), failed to respond to my emails and went online in an attempt to appease the very people who had written this content by making derogatory remarks about our campaign.
Further, you have unhelpfully and deliberately set out to misrepresent the facts in this case, casting Fathers4Justice as the villains, and Mumsnet as helpless victims, disingenuously claiming no knowledge of the offence committed. A case of gender stereotyping if ever there was one.
This is not the mature response we had hoped for from a respected CEO. It should hardly be a surprise then that given your antagonistic and belligerent response, the situation has escalated. Not because we wanted to engage in an online conflict with Mumsnet, but simply because you would not remove much of the content we complained of nor make a commitment to a policy of zero-tolerance on gender hatred.
This is a situation which could and should have
What Posesses a Man to Vote for a Woman..
This has always been a rather interesting phenomena to me. What possible advantage is there for any male to vote for a female in order to have her installed into office. Why do men sacrifice their vote to implant a member of the opposite sex into office just so she can ensure that his needs and requirements are totally ignored and only female entitlement is guaranteed on a far greater scale than it is right now..
Why would one install someone in office who has repeatedly demonstrated that when push comes to shove, she will side with her own sex and ensure that only the wishes and entitlements are ensured for her own sex only..
Surely, as we have witnessed this sufficiently over the years, women do not give a stuff about men. Whenever there is a choice to be made, when legislation calls for equal treatment or to pander to their own sex, they automatically vote for their own. That action has been demonstrated over and over again and has been glaringly obvious for decades. There is no automatic switch in the female brain that makes that change or makes it even a consideration. Female office holders have always and with regularity, demonstrated that they do not give a damn about our sex and are there solely to benefit their own..
So why the stupidity, why the ignorance and why the denial. Most men have a good and reasonable understanding about politics and have some inkling about what the candidate stands for. Takes some effort in checking the credentials and past attitudes and behavior of those candidates. Why is it that that same methodology is not used on female candidates. What possible motive does one have to vote a female into office knowing full well or is even guaranteed that that female will bias her own at the expense of the male voter..
We have already seen and witnessed this so often as politician chase the vagina vote and just take the male vote for granted. Do you like being taken for granted and why can so many women automatically count on your vote when the outcome will be the standard ca-sera-sera(what ever will be)..
Nothing will or is going to change while we keep voting them into office without holding them to account for their anti-male behaviour. On top of that, have a good look at the actions of women generally and specifically. The majority of male haters, as 99.9% of feminists are women. The majority of the laws that have been introduced of the last few decades that violates men's rights have been produced by women. The entire sexual abuse/assault industry is run by women and they have also been involved in introducing laws that take away men's rights. It has been women who have joined together and ensured that only they are favoured and we have been tossed to the scrap heap and here you are voting them into office to keep repeating the same thing over and over..
You really do need to change your thinking paradigm in regards to female office holders and at least check to see whether or not it's an anti-male, pro-female candidate or not. It is the absolute least you could do..
Oh, you need a few examples -
Sarah(I am a feminist) Palin..US
Nancy (feminist) Pelosi..US
Hillary (feminist) Clinton..US
Harriet (feminist) Harman..EN
Lynne (feminist) Featherstone..EN
Julia (feminist) Gillard..AUS
Tanya (feminist) Plibersek..AUS
Just to mention a few and name me one single working effort or deed or legislation that any of these women have introduced that benefit or assist or helps men in any way, shape or form.
With the ever increasing amount of people wanting to be counted and be involved in fighting the good fight against the feminasties, their lying ways and total dishonesty, we have another new brother in arms, who is patiently going where some fear to tread..
Over the years we have witnessed the procedures that feminists follow and the methodology they use to spread their poison. It would appear that no one is safe from that, not even smaller cities and towns, all which are open slather. Any place regardless of size will eventually bare the brunt of those messengers of hate and evil. If we can reduce their hate message and interference, then we have at least achieved something and it does all help..
Here is one such site and it relates to Smiths Falls, Ontario, Canada. Not that far from the border of the US.
I would like you to have a look at his site, support it by becoming a follower or leave a comment and lets see if we can help him fight the scourge that he has been fighting as well as we all have, for years..
I have been under attack by the local radicals for a while, the more join the more i can scare them.More information..
EMC Smiths falls, objectivity out the door, promoters of feminist untruths, radicalism and parental alienation.
This is a local post, for Lanark county and Smiths falls Ontario. In response to the Smiths falls EMC's refusal to publish the truth.
I have daughters and a grand daughter, by no means is this about women, it is about the destructive ideals of radical feminism and their effort to destroy the family.
-The family must be destroyed... Whatever its ultimate meaning, the break-up of families now is an objectively revolutionary process." -- Linda Gordon
-We can't destroy the inequities between men and women until we destroy marriage." Robin Morgan
-Since marriage constitutes slavery for women, it is clear that the women's movement must concentrate on attacking this institution. Freedom for women cannot be won without the abolition of marriage." -- Sheila Cronin, the leader of the feminist organization NOW
-Every woman's son is her potential betrayer and also the inevitable rapist or exploiter of another woman." -- Andrea Dworkin
What families experience at the hand of the local woman's shelter and social programs under it's anti parent directors and the staff in the Lanark county area, is destroying the very fabric of family life, therefore the nation itself. I believe that exposing the untruth been spewed out by these people need to be told. I will not go after all shelters because it would not be right, this blog supports the original ideas of the woman's shelter promoted by Erin Pizzey.(Pizzey said that militant feminists hijacked her cause and used it to try to demonise all men, not only in Britain, but internationally).
I can only speak about local experiences and provide undeniable proof that the propaganda been imposed on the local population is nothing other than a response to this blog.
After been told that this blog is been closely scrutinized by the shelters directors, "some" of her supporters in the police, I am glad they read it and do not like what is been written. And nothing makes me happier. The truth hurts.
The local paper the Emc smiths falls, has been a propaganda tool for the local radical left wing feminist for a long time, refusing to publish local horror stories coming out of the social programs. The shelter, the local school, (St John in Perth), with Ontario works, open doors, connections, family services and all others have been increasing their funding by going after teens, specifically teen girls. We have a saying in Smiths falls, "in the spring go downtown and see how many children are pushing strollers". Welfare on demand seems to be the local governments idea of economic recovery, in turn, teen drug abuse, crime, are a big problem and downtown businesses are becoming an extinct thing of the past. There was a study performed by local officials about this problem and when parents tried to get involved they were turned away, so much for their study. Those responsible for the problem, are in charge of studying the problem, makes sense doesn't it?
A WoManifesto – New year’s resolution: Part 1:
What women want
Guest Author - Joanna T.
I am at a huge disadvantage. I accepted a challenge for which I am ill-prepared.
Men NEVER listen to women about relationships. According to the grand dukes of the manosphere, they shouldn’t.
But what if I told you I was a Red Pill woman? OK, not helping.
What if I told you that this post was commissioned by a man who specifically wanted a sympathetic woman’s point of view?
I feel a slight shift in resistance.
What if this post was heavily edited by this man to make sure any male-bashing nonsense was excluded?
Ah, now I have an audience.
I like men. Just because.
I am a woman. Given that I am not into self-hatred, I also like women. Especially those who like men.
So without further ado, allow me to proceed.
This post and the rest which follow in this series address the problem with no name. That which has seen a gulf the size of a small planet develop between the sexes.
Christian J had the brilliant idea to collaborate in an effort to address the issue in a hopefully lighthearted manner and see where that leads.
I have another problem.
I am doing this all wrong.
The first post should be one about ‘What women can offer men’.
I know. I know. Women these days are all about what they want, rather than what they should give.
I promise you, there is a good reason I am doing it this way.
In any war negotiation I imagine (now, it must be said: I have never been a negotiator for say, the UN, so my speculation is purely that - speculation) that the most efficient way forward is to allow each party a chance to be heard first. Once the cards are on the table, demands on each party can then proceed. This may not guarantee that everyone is happy in the end, but I believe it is a good start.
Christian J will be posting a similar article on what men want from women.
I guarantee you something. His list will be longer than mine.
Let me preface this by letting you in on a little secret:
Most women really need to have a (good) relationship. That is her raison d’ètre.
Relationships are a woman’s domain (link to let the woman chase you).
The feminists will shoot me for this, but it is true.
This means that most women are prepared to work hard to keep a man.
So, with respect to relationships, you are already onto a winning streak if you were born male.
But you already knew that. It is no secret.
All women want from a man is...
That he ignores her bad behaviour and rewards the good.
So, guys, you are already doing it right if you have Game.
The biggest complaint women have about men is that whatever they do, it is not enough.
Some women really try hard for their man. Let’s call these women the ‘nice girls’.
They are the feminine women, the ones who actually like men. The ones men say they want.
These women get passed over for the ‘bitch’.
These ‘nice women’ finish last.
Most of these women remain nice. Some start to change, to turn into the bitch.
When a woman with a low ‘number’ realises that the slut is getting all the male attention, she wonders if she is doing it wrong.
When a woman who cooks for her boyfriend and encourages him to spend time with his friends watching the game on Sunday afternoons is passed over for the drama queen who has ‘issues’ with time apart from her man, the first woman will (mistakenly, of course) not repeat her ‘niceness in her next relationship. It is simple Pavlovian conditioning.
Nice girls finish last.
One way to solve today’s SMP problems is for men to do their best to nullify this idiom.
Nice guys finish last was a good propeller for you to learn Game. It was appropriate for you.
This is one example of where men and women’s differences should be celebrated (link to Male and female He created them). When a woman is not nice, she is not being feminine.
Masculine men want feminine women.
Encourage the feminine.
Discourage the bitchiness.
That is, if you really want to find and keep a good woman.
Most women are good women. Despite feminism.
A small minority are too entrenched in feminist ideation to be reached by common sense and goodwill. Avoid this woman. She is easy to spot. Many men in the manosphere have already had the misfortune of her acquaintance.
Unfortunately, the unintended consequences of this encounter has been the birth of the axiom ‘AWALT’ (All Women Are Like That).
The problem is,