f'n sickening -just goes to show that intelligence is not a pre-requisite for being a judge

*Shakes head*

Why am I not surpised by this BS, we all know that fathers in the western femanazi shithole nations are noting more then slaves to the women they marry and that other then having an oblagation to suport a women they marry and have crotch spawns with he has no other rights and when he tries to act like a real father the system comes hammering down on him for doing his job to protect and care for his children because of the femanazis who have reducsed fatherhood to a dirty word.

Hell if intelagance is not a major requerment to be a judge then maybe I should become a judge myself even though I'm not all that smart like so called normal people.

All in all this disgusts me to no end and some day some how these "People" will have to answer for their evil.

kargan-you are smarter than you think

Quote from outdoors

kargan-you are smarter than you think

SHHHH keep it quite, if it got out that men are intellagent the femanazis would have a fit LOL

I know I'm not smart like so called normal people but I also know I'm not stupid otherwise I wouldn't be an MRA
Thank you for your kind words.

I have said it before, and I will say it again, the illuminati are now promoting the acceptance of peadophiles, in time to come, someone with my point of view, (Anti peadophiles) will be called a “Bigot” for being “Intolerant.”

It is not an isolated case.
read this article;
Family Law Week: G & B (Children) [2009] EWCA Civ 10

It shows the determination to "SOIL FATHERS" permanently.

NEVO

The grounds for the appeal arose during the fact finding inquiry when the judge, unexpectedly, raised the question of whether a child had been unlawfully killed even though the pathologist could not unequivocally support such a finding. At the time counsel for the father questioned this conclusion and sought an adjournment to gather evidence on the point. The trial judge refused and in her judgment stated that it was more likely than not that the father was the perpetrator.

sorry i couldn't read anymore

Quote from nevosopelo

It is not an isolated case.
read this article;
Family Law Week: G & B (Children) [2009] EWCA Civ 10

It shows the determination to "SOIL FATHERS" permanently.

NEVO

I read the article you linked to and all I can say is that there is going to be an extra hot place in hell for these scum bags.
If I was the father I'd sue for deformation of charatcer/slander/liabil and what ever else the judge could be sued for.

I hope and pray that AB is in God's loving hands.

It gets so ridiculous as to be an outrage against reason, let alone rights. Judges like this should be hanged.


Postedby jonjayray at 19:39 Monday, July 11, 2011


When British political correctness gets TERMINALLY obnoxious


Father fined 1,000 pounds and found guilty of harassment for warningf amilies about a paedophile


A father who warned another parent about a convicted paedophile has been fined 1,000 and found guilty of harassing the sex offender. He was horrified to find his ex-wife's new husband - stepfather to his daughter, 11 - had served three jail terms for sex crimes.


A reporting restriction imposed to protect the stepfather's identity means that none of the family members can be named. One of the stepfather's sentences was for molesting two 12-year-old girls as they slept at his house.


A court heard the father raised the alarm after discovering four of his daughter's friends had been invited to the family home for a sleepover to celebrate her birthday. When he showed the mother of one girl a newspaper clipping revealing the stepfather's convictions, all the parents stopped their children going to the sleepover.


Following that action, as well as repeated phone calls to the home of his ex-wife and her husband, the father was arrested and convicted of harassment at Worcester Magistrates Court and fined œ1,000.


The father told the court he spoke out because he would have `felt responsible' if one of the children at the sleepover had been harmed. He added: `My decision was to speak up to one of the parents and leave it up to their discretion. `I was concerned for her daughter as I always have been for my own. My daughter is open to quite considerable harm in my eyes.'


A judge heard how the defendant's ex-wife began a relationship with the convicted paedophile in 2007 and is now married to him.


The defendant said he initially socialised with his ex-wife and her new partner, but relations soured when he learned of the man's past.


The stepfather was convicted of attempted rape in 1980 as a teenager. He was convicted of the same offence in 1988 and was jailed again in 1996 for molesting the two girls.


The court heard the defendant had signed a police harassment notice after earlier claims that he may have discussed the stepfather's past with others. The notice required him not to reveal the stepfather's convictions to anyone, including his own daughter.


But he breached the order last September by alerting the other parent. Prosecutor Owen Beale (P. Hang him by the balls) said the father, frustrated at what he saw as decreasing access to his daughter, also called his ex-wife's home 14 times in two hours one evening the same month, and rang her mobile phone three times.


In one message he said of the stepfather: `You are a self-confessed paedophile, rapist, fraudster, the lot... I just want to speak to my daughter.' In another, he threatened to come `round to sort things out once and for all'. The couple were at home but did not answer the phone. Instead they noted down the content of the messages and informed police.


The father told the court on Thursday that he made the calls as he had been unable to reach his daughter on her mobile because of poor reception in the area where she lives, and did not contact police or social services about the sleepover because he `didn't think they would act quickly enough'. (P. Right, too)


Mr Beale said of the fact the defendant's daughter was under the same roof as a convicted sex offender: `The authorities were not concerned that there was a risk because they left her there.'


District Judge Mark Layton (P. Dull Bugger) described the case as `hugely difficult' but said the charges against the father had been proved. He must pay œ775 costs and aœ15 victim surcharge, and banned from contact with the stepfather


SOURCE

anything that protects mom from being viewed as a danger to her children because of her choices

My Brother lives up North in a well known city.

He received a flier from one of his neighbours about an alleged paedophile in the neighbourhood.

The woman who put the flier through his door was doing the rounds, being an apparently unemployed woman with plenty of time on her hands, was going around the whole of the area (i.e. a good mile's circumference).

To my knowledge, she hasn't been taken to court for this...

Quote from Percy

The notice required him not to reveal the stepfather's convictions to anyone, including his own daughter.

To ask the father NOT to warn his own daughter, about this pervert, is "PURE INSANITY."

Sounds like the judge is insane.

Interesting. I wonder what would happen if some of the locals who read this article were to take up the mantle and start notifying everyone about the conviction. Would be interesting to see a judge try to make a ruling then.