George Clooney relieved to be Single Again, He vows to never marry or have children | |
Quote: George Clooney 'relieved to be single again' after split from raunchy ex-waitress Sarah
By Donna Mcconnell
Last updated at 8:04 PM on 29th May 2008
Hollywood's most famous batchelor, George Clooney is single again after splitting from ex-cocktail waitress Sarah Larson after a year, it has emerged.
Clooney, 47, and Miss Larson met in Las Vegas nearly four years ago, when the 29-year-old, a former reality show contestant, served at The Whiskey Bar.
But it wasn't until last June that their relationship that the couple began dating.
Now US magazine In Touch has claimed that the former ER star has split with Larson – and that she has been moved out of the mansion they shared in Los Angeles.
george clooney
Split: George Clooney has split from girlfriend Sarah Larson. They attended the Oscars together in February
A source told In Touch: 'George is relieved to be single again.
‘He thinks Sarah is sweet and that is why was so hard to break up with her.’
A source said the Leatherheads star recently moved out of his LA home so that 29-year-old Larson could be alone as she removed her belongings.
..............
Clooney, he was once married to actress Talia Balsam for four years, has famously claimed he will never get married again nor have any children.
But actresses Michelle Pfeiffer and Nicole Kidman each bet him $10,000 that he would be a father before he turned 40.
They were both wrong, and each sent him a cheque for the amount. But he returned the money, betting double or nothing that he won't have kids by age 50.
| Article source.
George seems to be aware of the dire deal that is the western marriage contract.
~ A man needs a woman like a lion needs a stove. ~
~ Women deserve only equal opportunity, not equal outcomes. ~
~ Men are not collectively "guilty" of anything. ~
~ Never needing to be pregnant is a blessing. ~
~ Feminist ideology “men have to respect women, but women have no reason to respect men” ~
~ Everybody makes choices, and nobody should be entitled to special treatment because of those choices.
Equal results based on unequal treatment amounts to no kind of equality at all. ~
| 
19th-June-2008
