Welcome to the forum.

Quote from camaradryan

Well, I didn't introduce myself before because...Wasn't sure I had anything relevant to the forum here.

Believe me, every man, no matter how seemingly inconsequential has something relevant to contribute towards the forum.

Can't really relate to divorce since I haven't been married. Can't relate to custody issues since I have no children.

I'd like to impress upon every man to see beyond his own personal circumstances and see the bigger picture. That is, it's important that even men who are not married nor have children - to get involved in changing the status quo.

See it as an insurance policy if you will, whereby even though marraige and children don't neccesarily appeal to you right now for instance, maybe in 5-10 years time they will. You might meet a good decent woman, but the laws are no better then they were, maybe worse. But ask yourself, what did you do to change this. If not for yourself, then maybe you're brother, father, (out of wedlock) son, grandson etc.

It's all ultimately relevant.

Quote from camaradryan

Well, I didn't introduce myself before because...Wasn't sure I had anything relevant to the forum here. I'm 34. Live in a small town in northeast TN, lifer. Work in the construction field. Can't really relate to divorce since I haven't been married. Can't relate to custody issues since I have no children.
I have had a couple of bad breakups with women though. Noticed early in life the double standards between males and females in school and around my home. How girls seemed to get away with things just because they were sweet looking and could whip up some tears. Grew up with a mom and sister and grandma who were somewhat overbearing and intrusive to my bodily privacy. I think this is why I protect my personal space and modesty as a man today.
I feel strongly that we men have lost so many bastions of brotherhood that our grandfathers took for granted. Now everything is almost exlusively co-ed such as our universities, our military, scouting, boys sports, clubhouses, gyms, dorms, even locker rooms/restrooms. Nothing it seems can be exclusively for men anymore. I just think that is wrong and weakens the morale and camaraderie of our gender.

You said a mouth full!

I too am not married nor do I have any children!
Yes, men do need their personal space with out females every once in awhile. Since feminists have made boys clubs out to be terrorist organizations, it's rather difficult to respect them or take them seriously!

Quote from Celtic Druid

Welcome to the forum.



Believe me, every man, no matter how seemingly inconsequential has something relevant to contribute towards the forum.



I'd like to impress upon every man to see beyond his own personal circumstances and see the bigger picture. That is, it's important that even men who are not married nor have children - to get involved in changing the status quo.

See it as an insurance policy if you will, whereby even though marraige and children don't neccesarily appeal to you right now for instance, maybe in 5-10 years time they will. You might meet a good decent woman, but the laws are no better then they were, maybe worse. But ask yourself, what did you do to change this. If not for yourself, then maybe you're brother, father, (out of wedlock) son, grandson etc.

It's all ultimately relevant.

Well said Druid.

Welcome camaradryan.

Welcome!

I agree- men need their time and space away from women and benefit from having time to spend with one another- just the guys.

Makes sense to me!

I used to be someone who thought that a healthy relationship was one where both people were together 24 hours a day ....can't believe I actually thought that and am not sure where I got the idea to begin with. Many years (and relationships) later, I know better. People need their space, and they need same-sex friendships. Couples don't need to be together 24/7!

Post Often!

Welcome aboard

Quote from Celtic Druid

Welcome to the forum.



Believe me, every man, no matter how seemingly inconsequential has something relevant to contribute towards the forum.



I'd like to impress upon every man to see beyond his own personal circumstances and see the bigger picture. That is, it's important that even men who are not married nor have children - to get involved in changing the status quo.

See it as an insurance policy if you will, whereby even though marraige and children don't neccesarily appeal to you right now for instance, maybe in 5-10 years time they will. You might meet a good decent woman, but the laws are no better then they were, maybe worse. But ask yourself, what did you do to change this. If not for yourself, then maybe you're brother, father, (out of wedlock) son, grandson etc.

It's all ultimately relevant.

amen.

Thanks for joining camaradryan. Enjoy your stay.

Quote from camaradryan

I feel strongly that we men have lost so many bastions of brotherhood that our grandfathers took for granted. Now everything is almost exlusively co-ed such as our universities, our military, scouting, boys sports, clubhouses, gyms, dorms, even locker rooms/restrooms. Nothing it seems can be exclusively for men anymore. I just think that is wrong and weakens the morale and camaraderie of our gender.

Indeed - this aspect of the War Against Boys & Men has been commented on here already, but deserves more analysis and exposure. It is being pushed by Misandrists under the guise of various 'Gang Rape Prevention' pogroms of the Radical Gender Feminist coven, which sees all unsupervised Male interaction as but a prelude to abuse.
However, you mention 'co-ed' attacks on groups like the Scouts but fail to mention the pogrom of forcing Radical Homosex Activists upon Men and Boys too.

The destruction of places where Male Bonding can thrive and grow is one of the most important goals of the Misandry movement - the better to isolate and marginalize Men opposed to the Hatred, Degradation and planned eventual Extermination of their Gender - in the name of 'tolerance' of course.

Forcing homo-anal coprophile perversions in to this Male Bonding dynamic achieves that goal, and helps to degrade and destroy natural sources of genuine 'Love / Bonding' between Men (a non sexual phenomenon based on characteristics of our inherited immutable gender, and one not similarly present in groups of Women) - by the promotion of a destructive focus on buggery and like homosex perversions.

Sooo... Single and Childless or not - Misandry affects all Men, including you.

Welcome
Ohso
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell

Quote from Ohso

Indeed - this aspect of the War Against Boys & Men has been commented on here already, but deserves more analysis and exposure. It is being pushed by Misandrists under the guise of various 'Gang Rape Prevention' pogroms of the Radical Gender Feminist coven, which sees all unsupervised Male interaction as but a prelude to abuse.
However, you mention 'co-ed' attacks on groups like the Scouts but fail to mention the pogrom of forcing Radical Homosex Activists upon Men and Boys too.

The destruction of places where Male Bonding can thrive and grow is one of the most important goals of the Misandry movement - the better to isolate and marginalize Men opposed to the Hatred, Degradation and planned eventual Extermination of their Gender - in the name of 'tolerance' of course.

Forcing homo-anal coprophile perversions in to this Male Bonding dynamic achieves that goal, and helps to degrade and destroy natural sources of genuine 'Love / Bonding' between Men (a non sexual phenomenon based on characteristics of our inherited immutable gender, and one not similarly present in groups of Women) - by the promotion of a destructive focus on buggery and like homosex perversions.

Sooo... Single and Childless or not - Misandry affects all Men, including you.

Welcome
Ohso
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell

Wow, Ohso, that's an interesting 'welcome'. Sounded like you are questioning/accusing me of being sympathetic to a 'homosexual-anal-perversion' agenda? Maybe that's not what you meant at all. So correct me if I'm wrong about that...

I'll have to admit, not being a Republican, I'm not that familiar with cases of 'radical homosex activists' infiltrating male clubs, military academies, boy scouts, etc. Perhaps you could educate me on some examples of this. I am however very aware of female activists forcing their way into all of those organizations to the detriment of morale and cohesiveness.

As much as 'gang rape prevention' is a guise to supervise male interaction, 'homosexual predator prevention' is equally so. While certainly there are well-known cases of such offenses (Priest-sanctioned activities aside) there seems to be a particular hysteria around male-only activities, even though girls are still the most frequent victims.

Why else would Moms and other totally unrelated women (lesbians) be allowed to become scout masters and attend campouts (which I assume used to be strictly for the guys) if not for the fear of male pedophiles? Why were these incidents unheard of in the first half of the 20th century when it truly was a 'male only' event? On the flipside of the coin, men will never be welcomed to supervise the girl scout campout and we all know why. Double standards.

As we speak the Navy is trying to figure out how to put women on submarines, an environment already cramped enough for the men on those vessels. Now they have to worry about extra sleeping compartments and latrines for females, or will they be forced to share the same facilities? Not to mention the inevitable pregnancies that will result. I have a simple solution to all the pregnant female soldiers in Iraq. Don't penalize them for human nature - just don't put women in the military to begin with!

Welcome Camaradryan.

I am into the Family Law aspect primarily but there is a lot more to stuff that go against Guys then just here, but keep am eye on it ( Family Law) as one day it may affect you or someone you know so be fore armed, meanwhile enjoy your visits and we look forward to your views

Davey

Quote from camaradryan

I have a simple solution to all the pregnant female soldiers in Iraq. Don't penalize them for human nature - just don't put women in the military to begin with!

Better to put them in all female squads so they can't sabotage their duty with deliberate pregnancy as an easy ticket back to safety away from battle. I agree though, that not all military areas are suitable for women.