Plain and simple, men are just better than women. Throughout history, men have had more of an impact, both negative and positive.

As a break from your activism, I invite you to menarebetterthanwomen.com

Pioneered by the author Dick Masterson, we explore the many facets of the continuous failure that is modern woman. Satire, advice, and exploration of social issues, all rolled into a wonderfully chauvinist site.

Enjoy!


Brokenjohnny

Oh for goodness sake.

I have an IQ at Sun-surface temperature. So I am better than you.

Now fuck off.

A high IQ eh? Well, just because you train a monkey to play a flute doesn't mean he's a musician.

Brokenjohnny, it is of no use bringing games of 'mine's bigger than your's' to a site like this. I will always mock it.

No use speaking for all men either. You do not and cannot. You don't speak for me and if you try you will get a thick ear.

Making claims as ridiculous as 'Men are better than Women' is the same infantile schoolyard game that feminazis play. Lift your game and play properly. Be a Man.

Trying to hide behind 'group inclusion' is their game too. It doesn't wash. There are too many thick stupid and bad women to make feminazi claims true and too many thick, stupid and bad men to make your dim assertion any truer.

I don't play the flute. My daughter used to be a good flautist though.

Now, do you have any useful things to say?

I remind readers of the quotation made by David Thomas: It is not that men are more evil than women; it is just that they are more effective.

That is the most accurate description - men are just more effective than women. We get far more things done, and far more things changed. You can insert your own moral dimension, and claim that men's greater effectiveness makes them more evil, or more good; or maybe more of both, depending on the context. That was DT's point. But men are overwhelmingly the movers and shakers. They have had a far greater effect on this planet and everything in it, for good or ill, than women have ever had.

I also find it interesting to see just how few of the things that men have moved and shaken, have been rejected by women. No objection by women to living in the houses that men have built, or driving the cars that men have invented, or using the scientific and medical advances that men have pioneered. Tellingly also, precious little objection to the wars in which male populations have been decimated, but which have ended up winning territory, resources and security from which women have gained.

The real history of women is that they have always sat back to see what men are going to produce next. If it is any good, they have taken advantage of it; if it is dangerous, they have just kept quietly out of the way until men have neutralised it; and if it just doesn't work, they have complained at men until they make it better.

Don't do any of the work to fight for democratic rights and the power of self-determination; let men do all the fighting and bleeding to achieve that. Just wait until they have established parliamentary democracy and an elective legislature; then whinge about women's entitlement to have a say in it. Is that not the history of women's right to vote? Agitate for the right - but only after men have created something worthwhile to vote for. There was no female suffragette movement in 1600 AD, when the only way to get political power was to work, plan and ultimately fight for it, with your life at stake if you failed. Not too many women wanted to play that little game, did they? Much better to let men exhaust themselves fighting it out until it all became very safe and civilised. Then sneak in the back door.

Same story across the board - let men sweat and toil to create a great golf course and club at Augusta, build it up, make it an international success and turn it into the envy of the sporting world; and then, when it is firmly established and all the hard work has been done by men, we suddenly see women appearing over the horizon and agitating for "equal" rights of membership.

Letting men do the work to create something great; then claiming you have been victimised by not being given an equal share of its benefits, as a tool to lever your way into grabbing the goodies without having had to lift a finger to earn them. It is the oldest female trick in the book. You will see examples everywhere.

Women have been the greatest opportunists in the universe. I give them credit for their cunning; but no honour.

You have certainly been in a thick mood lately.




Nobody questions that women do things, like play flutes. But men are the best at almost everything, and the best female is second best to men. Your daughter may be a flautist, and she may be a good flautist, but a woman will never be the best flautist. Men are the best at everything from sports and music to writing and mathematics.

Seems to me that a forum opposed to misandry is a good place to point that out.

Blessings

Bob

I think at the end of the day people have to get real.

The war between the genders was big in the 70's or 80's I hear.

Sooner or later we have to do something constructive. Because if we don't then our children and their children and their children are going to pay a terrible price.

For the most of people, men and women under 40, the yesterday years don't exist. Most wouldn't have a clue how to be non equal. We work with both men and women, we go to clubs that have both men and women, we are mostly in co-ed schools. Our religions are tainted with equality.

Our schools don't even allow prayer nor put dad and mum as parents. We have gay rights, we have lesbian rights, we have transgender rights and our children are being messed up from age 4 over what a gender actually is.

How do you propose to put women back in the kitchen and men back out working 60 or more so hours a week?

Yes.

Sorry everyone.

The black dog.

From what I have seen and still do, is not so much that it's men always banging on big time that they are "superior" to women in practically everything the human mind or body can perform (discounting of course those things which,,by the design of nature, women and only women can perform). What men are getting pissed off about is the increasing criticism that, generally, they are about as much use as a ladder is to a carpet layer, and articles in the press which seem to concentrate on the "achievements" of women over men in whatever, be it as a result of their advancement in the field of education, much of which has resulted from the very severe, and getting worse, neglect of the male in both the home (and society in general) and in the greatly increased feminisation of the whole education system. Everything is more or less geared to the the advancement of the female at the expense of the male largely because girls and boys perform differently under different systems.

It's not men saying it's they who are "better" at goodness knows what - it's the women constantly proclaiming their superiority as "human beings". For them to be able to do that they have to demean and diminish the status of the male, and this we see in all the TV adverts. And who all know how influential TV ads are on the average mind out there.

But when the chips are down and it really comes to some kind of final reckoning, and we are faced with some awful catastrophe of whatever kind, and a solution or way of tackling it has to come down to all the resources of the human mind and powers of reasoning and adaptability and working out quickly and efficiently, calmly and resolutely in order to save the planet from some terrible fate, with the use of physical prowess and endurability if necessary.........well, what are your bets, guys? Men or women best?

btw Today is Easter Day, and to believers it is the Resurrection. Jesus had twelve disciples. All of them male. Did he not rate the female highly enough? How does the Feminist Movement handle that one? I've never, ever seen any references to that, tbh.

You are right that young people are being trained in comformity, lesbianism, feminism, misandry, and conformity as the most important teaching in the state run schools. The biggest problem is to take over education and teach them something else. I suggest elimination of the state run indoctrination centers, by whatever means necissary.


It no longer takes women 10 hours per day to do all the housework. With the machines now provided to her by men it actually only takes 2 to 3 hours to get all needed housework done. That is a big contributor to female boredom with housework.

Furthermore, the notion that men should be working 60 hours per week is nonsense. If the government weren't robbing us of 80% of our income we could easily provide a good living to our family in 20 hours per week or so. Machines have taken most of the labor out of most occupations, and there is no need to labor long hours to provide the necissities of life.

There is a bigger problem finding jobs for everyone than getting the needed work done. There no longer is a real need for so much labor.

The real problem is the will to do it and the political domination of police state tyranny.

Blessings

Bob

menarebetterthanwomen.com is a tongue-in-cheek type of satirical site that serves as an antidote to the continuous psychological warfare that men are subjected to. The guy was on Dr. Phil, by the way, and drove all the women in the audience up the wall. Funny stuff.

To be honest, when and if that actually happens (and I have to admit part of me wishes it would), men and women will be forced to work together to survive or die alone. Some women may do the traditional mens'