Sons get private school priority

[scullion]

Sons get private school priority as 10,000 more are educated at institutions than girls

By Laura Clark

PUBLISHED: 23:51, 25 April 2012 | UPDATED: 23:51, 25 April 2012

* Comments (47)


Priority: Parents fear boys struggle at state schools

Parents are increasingly buying private education for their sons rather than their daughters, a census reveals.

Fee-paying schools now educate nearly 10,000 more boys than girls following a rise in the number of boys enrolled.

Parents are increasingly buying private education for their sons rather than their daughters, a census reveals.

Girls are outperforming boys at every stage of the education system and now make up 55 per cent of university freshers.

A census compiled by the Independent Schools Council - published today - reveals how pupil numbers increased 0.1 per cent on last year, bucking a four-year trend of falling enrolments.

But while the number of boys rose 0.3 per cent, the number of girls remained unchanged on last year.

Full article here - Sons get private school priority as 10,000 more are educated at institutions than girls | Mail Online

As most on here will already know, the education system is designed to keep boys uneducated, ignorant and brainwashed. The regime fear boys because, as men, they become potential revolutionaries. Those who can afford it should keep their sons out of the state sector at all costs.

A message for Celtic Druid:

Lots of misoginy here as usual. Magnus Carta, has it ever occured to you the reason women give boys lowe marks than do men is because women are more intelligent than men, and have a better grasp of the curricullum and subject matter? The reason girls get higher marks from women is because girls and women know what is right and what is wrong. Boys and men alike can never have the depth of understanding required, but because their minds work the same way men favour boys, even though they are wrong...

- Aileen, Harrogate, 26/4/2012 12:32

Oh dear...

[Garak]

Link? It really should be standard that if you post a thread about something on another site, you post the link so we can all read it.

Here is the link that I found by googling the title: Sons get private school priority as 10,000 more are educated at institutions than girls | Mail Online

[outdoors]

Lots of misoginy here as usual. Magnus Carta, has it ever occured to you the reason women give boys lowe marks than do men is because women are more intelligent than men, and have a better grasp of the curricullum and subject matter? The reason girls get higher marks from women is because girls and women know what is right and what is wrong. Boys and men alike can never have the depth of understanding required, but because their minds work the same way men favour boys, even though they are wrong...

- Aileen, Harrogate, 26/4/2012 12:32

Absolutely no misandry here though.

[Douglas]

Link?

Sons get private school priority as 10,000 more are educated at institutions than girls | Education News

Sons get private school priority as 10,000 more are educated at institutions than girls | Mail Online

As a non-gender aside, for those interested:
Schooling: Homeschool vs. Public School vs. Private School

[Garak]

Sons get private school priority as 10,000 more are educated at institutions than girls | Education News

Sons get private school priority as 10,000 more are educated at institutions than girls | Mail Online

As a non-gender aside, for those interested:
Schooling: Homeschool vs. Public School vs. Private School

LOL, thanks we both had the same idea it seems.

[FloatyBoaty]

As a non-gender aside, for those interested:
Schooling: Homeschool vs. Public School vs. Private School

I was home schooled, and I would say that the benefits outweigh the costs.

[scullion]

Link? It really should be standard that if you post a thread about something on another site, you post the link so we can all read it.

Thanks for this insightful post.

Clearly it slipped my mind, I've edited the opening post.

[Zerbu]

How long before feminists start screaming "parents don't send their girls to private school because they view them as inferior"?

[Celtic Druid]

Sons get private school priority as 10,000 more are educated at institutions than girls | Mail Online

My initial response on the Daily Mail site:

Given that state schools have a very gynocentric curriculum, a predominance of female teachers, 'exams' which can be composed of almost 90% coursework (which suits girls), an ingrained culture of feminism (particularly in universities) which is more interested in churning out pliable ideologues than market-ready workers. A study by the Centre for Economic Performance at the London School of Economics has shown that female teachers are giving boys lower marks than they deserve. Half the classes involved had their paper marked by in-house teachers who knew who they were dealing with, and the other half by external examiners who had no idea whose work they were assessing. And wouldn’t you know it, the external examiners gave the boys higher marks than the in-house (female) teachers. It seems state schools are deliberately engineered to fail boys so that girls can achieve! Can you blame parents who are wealthy enough to seek a less toxic and destructive academic environment for their sons?

The resident feminist troll, 'Aileen,' responded:

Lots of misoginy here as usual. Magnus Carta, has it ever occured to you the reason women give boys lowe marks than do men is because women are more intelligent than men, and have a better grasp of the curricullum and subject matter? The reason girls get higher marks from women is because girls and women know what is right and what is wrong. Boys and men alike can never have the depth of understanding required, but because their minds work the same way men favour boys, even though they are wrong...

My response:

Your knee jerk prattling sounds like something inculcated from the feminist handbook, and automatically labelling any dissent to your skewed worldview as misogyny, whilst ironically making misandric statements in response, is laughable. Do you actually read the nonsensical drivel you churn out?

She then indirectly responded to another post:

"feminism is all about women's rights, so anyone who is against feminism must by definition against women's rights. Anti-feminism is by definition misogyny.

I responded (which hasn't as yet been posted):

A cliched straw man argument straight from the feminist handbook. What the dictionary propounds feminism to be about (women's rights) doesn't actually manifest itself into political reality in any meaningful way. Quite the contrary. The 'rights' of western women have long since transcended into excessive privileges, and radical feminists who inhabit influential positions are busying themselves stripping men of their remaining rights. A paradox indeed. All the evidence overwhemingly unveils feminism to be a hate and supremacist cultist movement. Look not at the claims of a group, but their actions instead! Opposing a hate ideology such as feminism is not only justified, but the duty of all those who value individual liberty, family and freedom of expression.

It's been my experience, that when I and other MRAs starting kicking ass on certain threads on DM, they either don't post further input or the thread strangely shuts down.

It's important to ridicule and rip apart feminism whenever the opportunity arises and that we use our extensive knowledge to dominate any debate.

[paul parmenter]

Excellent stuff, CD. I note that Aileen's insane rantings are starting to collect plenty of red arrows. It's great when one of these sour feminists opens her mouth and reveals just how much poison and hatred lies inside; especially on a very public and well-read forum. It's not just MRAs that sit up and take notice.

On the main topic, we are also starting to see parents voting with their feet - steadily removing their sons from the toxic state school environment. This will, over time, translate into a correcting of the current imbalance in higher education. Nature has its own way of righting itself against extremism.

No wonder the Aileens of this world - clearly a product herself of a gynocentric education, which obviously pays no attention whatsoever to logical thought or even the ability to spell properly - are foaming at the mouth. They know they are never going to win in the long term.

[Douglas]

Here's one of Aileen's comments on the subject. If it were not for the fact that I have read such things in feminist literature and heard them from recorded feminist meetings, I'd wonder if anyone believes this kind of crap. As it is .. well, it's just feminism at its core and anyone supporting feminism is effectively propping up such beliefs.

Educating boys is an expensive waste; ideally mothers would only have their sons educated up to age 11, After that they should be placed in training colleges to be taught skills that will make them useful to women. After all, girls do better anyway so as women bcome dominant they will need men to do the dirty, uncomfortable and dangerous jobs that women will be too busy to do. As they are, these expensive private schools are an example of the widespreas misoginy in our society. They should all be forced to be all-girls schools or forced to close. There should be no access to education for males; men in top positions have caused too much harm already.

I don't believe that anyone holding such views on children of either gender should be allowed to have children, nor should they interact with them in any way.

[Percy]

Dont you just love it when some half-witted feminist drone opens her mouth and condemns herself.

It is a gift. Ammunition. A target to shoot at.

Stand up Aileen of Harrogate. CD is a nice man and a fine shot. He likes a quick and easy kill.

[Douglas]

I know I should no longer be amazed at how ignorant people can be, given that most of them have had feminist indoctrination just as much as they have had an education. Maybe this respondent isn't ignorant but is just choosing to bring in irrelevancies to cloud the issue:

Well duh, maybe these parents only have sons and no daughters and there are more men than women in the world anyway

Well duh, maybe the world population of 2% more males is not very relevant when discussing education in the United Kingdom, where there are 3% more females.

[Celtic Druid]

No wonder the Aileens of this world - clearly a product herself of a gynocentric education, which obviously pays no attention whatsoever to logical thought or even the ability to spell properly - are foaming at the mouth. They know they are never going to win in the long term.

Especially when we have intellectual warriors like you on our side.

[Popadibs]

Dont you just love it when some half-witted feminist drone opens her mouth and condemns herself.

It is a gift. Ammunition. A target to shoot at.

Stand up Aileen of Harrogate. CD is a nice man and a fine shot. He likes a quick and easy kill.

I believe I heard a white supremacist say "We don't need to kill the niggers; they'll kill themselves."

We don't need to expose feminists; they'll expose themselves. I've stated numerous times that women (you'd probably replace 'women' with 'feminists') will do more to expose themselves than a men's movement ever could.

In fact, the basis for men listening to me is often because they have seen evidence of what I speak.