An Australian Win for Military Equality
This is a discussion on An Australian Win for Military Equality within the Good News Forum. anti misandry forums, part of the General category; Australia to put women on war frontline For the first time, women will be offered forward combat roles in the ...
-
An Australian Win for Military Equality
Australia to put women on war frontline
Well that's good news for you Australians. Finally ye olde discriminatory chivalry is dying to the benefit of modern men. With this goal out of the way, all that's left is for mandatory gender quotas for the military.For the first time, women will be offered forward combat roles in the Australian Defence Force, reports the Australian newspaper.
While a vast majority of military jobs are currently open to women in Australia, female soldiers have never been allowed to serve in more dangerous positions like with the special forces, as well as with infantry and armored units, the Australian reports.
. . .
Australia currently has military units deployed throughout the world, but its most dangerous commitment is still in Afghanistan, where more than 1,500 of its troops are currently deployed, some in active combat roles.
Australia now joins Canada, New Zealand and Israel as the only nations which allow women to fight on the frontlines of war in their armies. Among those nations, Israel has long been held up as an example for its egalitarian approach to national defense.
I want to see 50/50 casualties. To anyone who thinks it's misogynistic or male-chauvinist to hope for more female deaths in combat and fewer male deaths, remember that when feminists push for greater numbers of women in certain job-areas, that entails men not getting those jobs.
Gender quotas in boardrooms? Fine; but gender quotas in the military. Being a soldier is no longer about wielding a heavy sword and shield; women can easily do this.
The article goes on to talk about America:
Hey ladies, Aunt Sam wants YOU!!!Women have for some time been allowed to serve in roles in the U.S. military that occasionally see combat, but are not allowed into forward infantry, armored and similar divisions.
A recent poll suggests that two-thirds of all American voters favor allowing women "to serve in ground units that engage in close combat" with 29 percent opposed, Agence France Presse reports. Among voters 18 to 34 years old, the poll showed support for lifting the ban at 81 percent, while Americans over the age of 55 backed the change 55-38 percent.
(And no, you're not sleeping your way out of this one.)
- 22nd-April-2011 # ADS
Advertisement Circuit advertisement- Member Since
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
You may also enjoy reading the following threads, why not give them a try?
-
Open Question: Why do feminists measure equality of opportunity by equality of outcom
By RSSreader in forum Chit chat (MAIN)Replies: 1Last Post: 4th-November-2009, 04:31 PM -
Open Question: What is the difference between legal equality and actual equality?
By RSSreader in forum Chit chat (MAIN)Replies: 1Last Post: 10th-February-2009, 07:37 AM -
Females in the Military
By Dani in forum Feminist FlipsideReplies: 38Last Post: 2nd-February-2008, 04:42 PM -
Gender Equality Duty – biggest change in sex equality legislation for 30 years
By Rebadow in forum Chit chat (MAIN)Replies: 0Last Post: 26th-March-2007, 01:47 PM




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks








Reply With Quote







Bookmarks