Quote from AKUUS

Is this the fruit of feminism? Some things are worse than death.


This young couple was kidnapped, raped, butchered and murdered:

Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom - Google News
foxnews.com/story/0,2933,539927,00.html

How is this for double speak? The case is "racially charged" because the accused are poor Blacks, but the White victims are not hate crime victims! Instead, the crime "went awry", as if it had a mind of its own and the criminals were passive!

"...The case is racially charged — the defendants are poor and black, the victims were middle-class and white — and it has drawn extensive media coverage locally. Judge Richard Baumgartner obtained a sequestered jury from Nashville, some 150 miles away, to reduce chances of bias...

...Police, prosecutors and the victims' families maintain that Newsom and Christian were not victims of a hate crime, rather victims of a carjacking that went terribly awry..."


Here is a similar, though, if you can believe it, worse horror story:

Two Black men raped and forced three White men and two White women to perform sex acts on each other before shooting them execution style in a field. One woman survived to tell the tale.

The Truth Seeker - The Wichita Massacre - Another Shameless Media ...

...Armed with a handgun, the Blacks forced all the Whites to strip off their clothes and shoved them into a bedroom closet. At first, the Blacks showed little interest in robbery, though the Whites told them "take our money, take whatever you want." The young Whites were then brought out into another room, one or two at a time, for rape and sexual degradation.

According to HG's testimony (which was subsequently censored) transcribed at the CourtTV message board, the Whites were forced to submit to rape and sodomy from the Blacks and were also forced to rape each other to put on a kind of "sex show" for the Blacks..

'Wichita Massacre' Brothers Sentenced to Death

...However, Sedgwick County, Kan., District Attorney Nola Foulston said she would not charge the suspects with committing "hate crimes" because she believed the murders were motivated by robbery and not racial hatred...

Why don't people defend themselves?

I find it sad and ironic that people do not value their lives or the lives of their loved ones enough to prepare to defend themselves with guns, knife and makeshift weaponry, but then, when they are attacked, they are willing to submit to any form of human degradation just to stay alive. Some things are worse than death. Who would want to live having been humiliated in the ways described above? Who would want to do those things, be murdered, and leave his family with those memories? Why don't people fight tooth and nail with whatever ever they have available until victorious or dead? Or just tell the criminals that you will not submit and that they should just go ahead and kill you. Cowards look for easy prey. The more you submit, the more they will degrade and abuse you. Self-defense is a mentality most people do not have.

Armed Response
What you need to know before, during, and after a life-threatening encounter.

Men are being conditioned consciously or subconsciously to be submissive. If men submit to the will of a female over nothing other than pussy what will they do when an significant higher threat opposes them?

If most men won't even fight for their rights then what will they fight for?

As for this mentioning of hate crimes, I've never heard of a love crime. This is just a way to further perpetuate the idea that the crime was motivated by racism regardless of whether or not race was a factor.

If a black man and white man fight one another it is not a hate crime. They just happen to have different shades of colored skin and a disagreement which has nothing to do with racism.

To me, scrutizing crimes of white people commited against black people more so than vice versa makes it seem as if somehow when a black person commits a crime against a white person it's not as critical.

This is what the feminist equivalent of domestic violence. Feminist idealogies makes it seem as if crimes that men commit against women are somehow worse than crimes that women commit against men the same way these ideas make it seem as if whites commiting crimes against blacks is somehow worse than blacks commiting crimes against whites.

Crime is crime and I don't see how a black person killing or hurting a black person or a white person killing or hurting a white person or a white person killing or hurting a black person is any worse than a black person killing a white person.

This "hate crime" idealogy does more to divide people of different cultures than anything. It makes race a factor in situations where race should not be just like feminists make gender a factor in situations that gender should not be. This is racist towards whites because it paints whites out to be racist even in cases that race isn't the issue. Political correctness does a lot of harm.

thing is, is that you are supposed to punish the act, not the thought of the act
that is why I oppose hate crime laws
you aint no less dead if you were stabbed over a dice game by your cousin than if you got drug to death by some skinheads

Quote from Aug9th-LiveOrDie

thing is, is that you are supposed to punish the act, not the thought of the act
that is why I oppose hate crime laws
you aint no less dead if you were stabbed over a dice game by your cousin than if you got drug to death by some skinheads

It is near impossible to know the intention behind an act.

Quote from Popadibs

Men are being conditioned consciously or subconsciously to be submissive. If men submit to the will of a female over nothing other than pussy what will they do when an significant higher threat opposes them?

If most men won't even fight for their rights then what will they fight for?

As for this mentioning of hate crimes, I've never heard of a love crime. This is just a way to further perpetuate the idea that the crime was motivated by racism regardless of whether or not race was a factor.

If a black man and white man fight one another it is not a hate crime. They just happen to have different shades of colored skin and a disagreement which has nothing to do with racism.

To me, scrutizing crimes of white people commited against black people more so than vice versa makes it seem as if somehow when a black person commits a crime against a white person it's not as critical.

This is what the feminist equivalent of domestic violence. Feminist idealogies makes it seem as if crimes that men commit against women are somehow worse than crimes that women commit against men the same way these ideas make it seem as if whites commiting crimes against blacks is somehow worse than blacks commiting crimes against whites.

Crime is crime and I don't see how a black person killing or hurting a black person or a white person killing or hurting a white person or a white person killing or hurting a black person is any worse than a black person killing a white person.

This "hate crime" idealogy does more to divide people of different cultures than anything. It makes race a factor in situations where race should not be just like feminists make gender a factor in situations that gender should not be. This is racist towards whites because it paints whites out to be racist even in cases that race isn't the issue. Political correctness does a lot of harm.

Both what the civil liberties movement turned into and what feminism is are filth emanated from the same toilet - cultural Marxism. This is why they resemble so much. I'd give you rep for this post, but I'd have to spread it some more.

Quote from RebelliousVanilla

Both what the civil liberties movement turned into and what feminism is are filth emanated from the same toilet - cultural Marxism. This is why they resemble so much. I'd give you rep for this post, but I'd have to spread it some more.

Yes, indeed. The Civil Liberties/Rights movement was one of the most destructive things in American history. The government has no right, constitutional or moral, to tell a private business owner whom he has to serve. If a restaurant owner only wants to serve red-headed midgets, and his business thrives or fails, that is his business, pun intended.

I would have no problem if a Black business owner refused to serve Whites as long as the opposite were allowed. It is not that I want businesses to discriminate. I want the government to mind its own business and to be as small and feckless as possible. The government tends to screw everything up.

Now, the fruit of the Civil Rights movement is that state governments are banning smoking in private business. Again, that is not right. I hate smoking. I hate 2nd-hand smoke. I think smokers are generally rude and inconsiderate about their smoking. And I hate coming home smelling like an ash tray. However, as much as I hate all of those things, I hate government infringement upon private citizen's rights even more.

What's next? Are waitresses going to have to measure your BMI before they can serve you dessert? Or will there be one of those "You must be this tall to go on this ride" type of signs you see at amusement parks reading "You must be this thin to eat dessert" at each restaurant in the US?

Government services should not be allowed to discriminate against citizens, but government services should be as limited as possible and government intervention in private affairs should be non-existent as long as no one is being harmed.

Quote from Billy

No, you're thinking of the bayous in Louisiana.
Cajun people

I know many Cajuns and the claim is that they are part black and part French. Most say it's a myth. They look white as can be.

I love some Cajun cooking.

But even you can see the racism!

Quote from RebelliousVanilla

I'd give you rep for this post, but I'd have to spread it some more.

Wait, is that a socialism joke "spread the wealth" or is that some function on this site I haven't learned yet?

You can give other users reputation when you click on the scale above their post. Sometimes you have to give reps to other users first before you can give reps to them again.

Quote from Popadibs

Wait, is that a socialism joke "spread the wealth" or is that some function on this site I haven't learned yet?

No. You're supposed to give rep to a couple of others before you give to the same person again so that you don't abuse it. lol@spread the wealth

too many low life women out there today.

Quote from Dylan MacVillain

Is this the fruit of feminism? Some things are worse than death.

Less than half a century ago, everything was in reverse. Just within the 20th century alone, whites bombed an entire city full of black people (the Tulsa race riots) and many asked... why didn't blacks defend themselves?

Funny, how the pendulum swings. It ain't right either way, of course.

Quote from Feckless

You can give other users reputation when you click on the scale above their post. Sometimes you have to give reps to other users first before you can give reps to them again.

Yes, but if you give too much rep you are being feckless.

they always instill in us that we have to protect women. we have to die for them, if you are male of course. which is an age old cliche that's getting old.

but men do defend themselves, just not against their mates :[