The truth behind the sexual abuses

**Dulantha** · 28th-March-2011

As we know, feminists are very keen to target only heterosexual sex offenders in any social background. I am not telling that the heterosexual abusing is good. But the thing is homosexual and bisexual sex offenders are more than heterosexuals. Both gays and lesbians are abusing children and young teenagers. This tendency is rapidly growing in such places like schools, educational institutes and other residences. Especially in single sex schools there is a big degree and a room to practice abnormal sexual behaviors. And also when some one is sexually abused by a gay or a lesbian, there is a higher probability to that person to continue the same abnormal sexual lifestyle. Feminists know this thing better. They are concealing deliberately this homosexual offensive behavior and related abuses. Because of complicating the sexual lifestyle of society and spreading a hatred attitude towards pure heterosexual people are primary objects of feminists. That is why they are hardly trying to target pure heterosexual people.

**Percy** · 28th-March-2011

I think that most people here would find some agreement with the general thrust of your statement, but by itself it is just assertion with not a shred of evidence presented. It hardly rates as an opinion.

Were someone come to this site and see that post, they would think us little different in tone and insistence from raging feminists.

**Marx** · 28th-March-2011

I can only agree with the saggy boobed avatar directly above

**dad_savage** · 28th-March-2011

Because of complicating the sexual lifestyle of society and spreading a hatred attitude towards pure heterosexual people are primary objects of feminists.

Refering to the heterosexual as pure in contrast to homosexuals to me seems unjustifiably pejorative. Even if the intent is only to express that heterosexuality is normal, and homosexuality abnormal it has an offensive subtext. Why not simply use the terms normal and abnormal? I am unimpressed by the assumption that homosexuals are tainted or soiled in contrast to heterosexuals.

Heterosexuality is just as amendable to perversion, to dysfunctional or destructive sexual behavior as it homosexuality. Homosexuality is not something about which to toss about moral injunctions as it is a state of mind; it implies nothing but direction of focus and intent. I'm bisexual, yet I have been male-celibate for eleven years and wholly celibate for about three as a matter of choice, and your comment implies I'm somehow less pure than the average heterosexual male who will cheerfully shove his tackle into the first available female orifice (with absolutely no regard to the idea of selection, temperance or respect for ones self) at any given oppertunity with almost no thought, and defend this as 'the fulfilment of a natural biological urge,' while mendaciously suppressing the result that biological urge exists in reference to creating even to the point of condoning murder.

Shameless self-indulgence supported by industrialized mass-murder is your idea of purity?

Fuck off.