Throw Out The Female Members of Congress
This is a discussion on Throw Out The Female Members of Congress within the General News anti misandry forums, part of the General category; Audio: [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGY0D3U0lU4&feature=related"][COLOR=#800080]Throw Out The Female Members of Congress[/COLO"]YouTube - Throw Out The Female Members of Congress[/ame] Article: www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=43354...
- 24th-May-2009 #1
Throw Out The Female Members of Congress
Audio:
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGY0D3U0lU4&feature=related"][COLOR=#800080]Throw Out The Female Members of Congress[/COLO"]YouTube - Throw Out The Female Members of Congress[/ame]
Article:
www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=43354"Rights for women and responsibilities for men is really license for women, slavery for men, and liberty for neither. " Dylan MacVillain
- 24th-May-2009 # ADS
Advertisement Circuit advertisement- Member Since
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
- 24th-May-2009 #2
Re: Throw Out The Female Members of Congress
She pretty much just described every liberal in Congress.
-
Re: Throw Out The Female Members of Congress
__________
"The man who does things makes many mistakes, but he never makes the biggest mistake of all - doing nothing."
Benjamin Franklin
http://objectifygirls.blogspot.com
- 24th-May-2009 #4
Re: Throw Out The Female Members of Congress
Why pick on women for simply being 'hormonal' and 'backgrounds', whatever that means.
Why not throw out all the men who are liars and carpetbaggers, corruptly in the pockets of others with money, the schemers and dissemblers, the medacious and the cowards, the crooks and the Mafia tools, the Barons of Industries stealing from the public purse to prop up their shonkey businesses?
Men may not be as 'hormonal' as some women but by the Lord Harry many are emotionally incontinent and fatuous, and a lot, lot worse. Most would sell their Grand-dad's heritage just to get into the knickers of the women there.
At least British MPs go to Discreet Bespoke Ladies Undergarment Boutiques in the back streets and buy their own knickers !
Being issued with a dick on being born doesn't confer either good sense nor honesty.
Cum dilectione hominum et odio vitiorum
Love the Sinner but not the Sin.
(St. Augustine)
“ For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers,
against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. “
(and within ourselves)
(Ephesians 6:12 (KJV)
A Feminist is a human being who has lost her way and turned vicious.
If you meet one on the road as you Go your Own Way,
offer kindness but keep your sword drawn.
(Me)
- 24th-May-2009 #5
Re: Throw Out The Female Members of Congress
Brief synopsis?
Without linking.(paleo-puter)
There's much brewhaha concerning the OBVIOUS choice for The Supreme Court of the US be a woman, preferably one with a Mexican/Puerto Rican accent, for reasons that are not clear to me.
Ladies and Gentleman, may I introduce the kinder, gentler stylings of Nancy Pelosi, Madeline Albright, Janet Napalitano, Hillary Clinton, "Carly" Fiorina, Barbara Boxer .....oh hell, why bother....
- 24th-May-2009 #6
Re: Throw Out The Female Members of Congress
I disagree.
Apparently, some men that somehow find themselves inheriting a "position" amongst The Peerage, manage to sucessfully sell the heritage of their countrymen's Grand Fathers to insure the trappings that keep them privy to the so-called Holy Grail.
Of course, in Utopia, SOME animals are more equal than others......
ADD:True, nor can ANYONE simply purchase either good sense or honesty, and simply strap it onBeing issued with a dick on being born doesn't confer either good sense nor honesty.
for show. For long anyway.....Last edited by CaptDMO; 24th-May-2009 at 04:17 PM. Reason: Add snark clarifying [i]credentials[/i].
- 24th-May-2009 #7
- 24th-May-2009 #8
Re: Throw Out The Female Members of Congress
It's quite simple really:
Choosing a qualified man would be misogynistic. Choosing someone because she's a woman would be politically correct.
Choosing a qualified White person would be racist. Choosing someone because he's not White would be politically correct.
Choosing a qualified American would be xenophobic. Choosing a foreigner would be politically correct.
Ignorance is strength.
War is peace.
Freedom is slavery.
Diversity is unity.Last edited by Dylan MacVillain; 25th-May-2009 at 07:59 AM.
"Rights for women and responsibilities for men is really license for women, slavery for men, and liberty for neither. " Dylan MacVillain
- 25th-May-2009 #9
You may also enjoy reading the following threads, why not give them a try?
-
"Pelosi Calls All Female Democratic Members Into Meeting"By Zuberi in forum General NewsReplies: 6Last Post: 18th-March-2010, 03:27 AM -
Repost: Throw out all female members of Congress!
By bola in forum Chit chat (MAIN)Replies: 8Last Post: 25th-September-2006, 08:17 PM -
Throw out all female members of Congress!
By bola in forum Chit chat (MAIN)Replies: 0Last Post: 24th-September-2006, 06:16 PM -
Marriage Collapses Under GOP Congress
By khankrumthebulgar in forum Chit chat (MAIN)Replies: 0Last Post: 22nd-April-2006, 05:15 PM




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks








Reply With Quote







Bookmarks