Some feminists are trying to create a new law for women who murder children under a year of age as being a lesser crime than if anyone else (e.g. a man) were to kill a baby under a year old, and less than 'normal' (for lack of a better word) murder charges.

Infanticide is the killing of a child under a year old. According to available data of today, more - considerably more - children are killed via infanticide than the general population (is at risk of being murdered). Often, infanticide is committed within an hour of birth. In England and the US, male babies are at the highest risk of being murdered victims of infanticide. In the US, Jessica Farrar has proposed that infanticide be legally defined as a lesser crime than murder.

antimisandry.com http://antimisandry.com/articles/fem...#ixzz1uc48wiK1

Ya,and now you have one of ours;

Canadian mom arrested in babies' deaths in U.K.

Felicia Boots, 34, held in connection with death of infant son and daughter



Foreign Affairs says a Canadian woman is in police custody in Britain in connection with the death of her two children.

Neither Canadian officials nor London police would release the woman's name, but British media reports have identified her as 34-year-old Felicia Boots.

Reports say her husband, Jeffrey Boots, a former investment banker with the Bank of Montreal, discovered the bodies of the children on Wednesday night.

London police say the victims were a 10-week-old boy and a 14-month-old girl, but would not speculate on the victims' identities or cause of death.

A police news release says a woman is being held on suspicion of murder and a spokesman says investigators are not seeking any other suspects.

Autopsies are scheduled for Friday morning, and police say they will release more details at that time.

Canadian mom arrested in babies' deaths in U.K. - Canada - CBC News

Sky News has just confirmed she's been charged with two counts of murder. Although one doesn't need to be Nostradamus to foresee that the final sentencing will be woefully inadequate!

Mrs Boots was arrested at the family home. She had apparently tried to harm herself but did not need hospital treatment.

Barely worthy of a plaster then?

These murdering mothers are always ruthlessly efficient in executing their children, but dismal failures in supposedly trying to top themselves afterwards. I didn't realize depression could selectively manifest it's violence regarding 'targets.' And why is it that these unstoppable outbursts are undertaken when the father is out, rarely ever when he's present? There's an undeniable degree of forethought involved here! Random or spontaneous it isn't. That doesn't sound like the faux condition of 'post-natal depression' as I understand it, it reads like something orchestrated by someone concerned with self-preservation and waiting for a flood of pukeworthy liberal sympathy to wash over their guilt.


One can see in the below link how easily mothers can violently set upon their children for no excusable reason. Watch the video and realize if nobody had been around to witness her attack, she could have easily descended into killing the girl and people would be attributing 'post-natal depression' rather than cold-blooded murder. Right?

http://antimisandry.com/other-langua...#axzz1ud5S3d71

When a mother (or a Father) murders her/his child one has to wonder at the state of mind.

I don't think it is reasonable to dismiss post-natal depression; it describes depression ( a real illness) after giving birth.

It happens.

That it can be an excuse for murder is not reasonable.

I see no 'reason' as being an excuse for murdering small children. No 'threat' to the mother's life was coming from those children. They were vulnerable and incapable of harming her.

Unless a killing happens when one is under extreme threat, and intent was not in mind, there can be no excuse for murder.

Yet murders happen.

I have to assume the murderer was unhinged in some way.

The issue to me is not so much the rationale, used as an excuse or otherwise, but the consequence.

A Father threw his little girl off the Westgate bridge in Melbourne two years ago. I read all the excuses for his action - divorce and such - he was depressed too - but just cannot find that to be an excuse, and certainly cannot overlook the dreadful consequence.

'We all have children around here and it’s hit us all. I can’t imagine what she must have been going through, why didn’t she get help?

The note she left on the flowers read: 'Hello, you don’t know me but I just wanted to say we are sorry for your loss. You and your wife are in our thoughts and I hope you find the strength to get through this. We hope you find peace back in your lives one day. A neighbour a few roads away. God bless.'

I am fuming. Two children are dead, and the neighbour can't imagine what SHE must have been going through? She kills two children, and yet she is in their thoughts? Well, yes, she's in mine, too; only I'd better not describe them, right now..........

Quote from Percy

When a mother (or a Father) murders her/his child one has to wonder at the state of mind.

I don't think it is reasonable to dismiss post-natal depression; it describes depression ( a real illness) after giving birth.

It happens.

That it can be an excuse for murder is not reasonable.

Indeed, you're more eminently positioned than most Percy, as to how many different types of depression which exist, but 'post-natal depression' is the only 'variant' which regularly pardons murder without considered ethical and professional investigation. By universally affording such a disproportionate degree of prominence and mitigation to 'post-natal depression' than any other kind of depression, is complicity enshrined in law. A murderers charter!

And as others have inferred, the media fuels this farcical theatre by routinely speculating it could be 'post-natal depression' without being in full command of the facts. Which in turn influences the general consensus, where vote hungry politicians carefully take note and model certain laws in accordance with what returns or maintains their power. And so it depressingly goes.............

Quote from Celtic Druid

Indeed, you're more eminently positioned than most Percy, as to how many different types of depression which exist, but 'post-natal depression' is the only 'variant' which regularly pardons murder without considered ethical and professional investigation. By universally affording such a disproportionate degree of prominence and mitigation to 'post-natal depression' than any other kind of depression, is complicity enshrined in law. A murderers charter!

And as others have inferred, the media fuels this farcical theatre by routinely speculating it could be 'post-natal depression' without being in full command of the facts. Which in turn influences the general consensus, where vote hungry politicians carefully take note and model certain laws in accordance with what returns or maintains their power. And so it depressingly goes.............

The "excuse" of 'post-natal depression' is simply a way to avoid the responsibility. It is true that some have it worse than others, but I've never seen it make a mother want to do anything other than nothing (what tiny bit I've seen). Also, why isn't it considered dangerous to the child for a mother to have 'post-natal depression'? I don't really expect an answer - just something to ponder.

Oh, and great post CD.

Quote from Marx

Some feminists are trying to create a new law for women who murder children under a year of age as being a lesser crime than if anyone else (e.g. a man) were to kill a baby under a year old, and less than 'normal' (for lack of a better word) murder charges.

They already have a group of medical "ethicists" laying the groundwork for this.
"
Killing babies no different from abortion, experts say - Telegraph

Quote from Unregistard

They already have a group of medical "ethicists" laying the groundwork for this.
"
Killing babies no different from abortion, experts say - Telegraph

Yep, I posted back in January about one such case. UK ethicist, Anna Smajdor, wants women to abandon motherhood

Quote from Marx

Yep, I posted back in January about one such case.

I knew there was an article here somewhere, I just couldn't find it. I kept searching for Australian psychologists for some reason.

But I thought a link to the "ethicists" article was appropriate to show the lengths to which these people will go to excuse female depravity. Is there anything that they will not excuse?

No matter how depressed this mother was it did not give her the right to kill two innocent children. she should have killed herself yet she lives and they are dead.