Thread: Menace of the violent girls: Binge-drinking culture fuels surge in attacks by women

'Gordon Brown's failed policies have contributed to family breakdown, failing school discipline and mixed messages on drugs and binge-drinking. This has fuelled youth crime.'

Absolutely un-fuckin'-believable, the man's in the job for about a year, and it's his fault.
You see, when he became Prime Minister, most young girls thought "Right, that's it, I'm going out to cause trouble", absolutely absurd to blame him for this.

Father's not being in the home, whether they're deadbeats or dads who are being pushed out their child's life, is the main reason of society going to pot, once he goes out the door, the discipline goes with him, it is so overwhelmingly obvious, which is why it annoys me when people blame Gordon Brown (or someone else) for it.

Add the fact that girls are raised to know for a fact that they will not be punished for their wrong-doings, and if they are, it will not be as harshly as boys, then add the fact that women are given a stockpile of excuses for their wrong-doings, like;
"It's the school's fault"
"It's the government's fault"
"It's a man's fault (the closest one, any one will do)"
"It's hard being a woman in a man's world"
"Women have a lot on their plate"
"It's society's fault"
"It's anybody's bloody fault but my own"
and what we're left with is chaos, total chaos, that by the way, we as men will be blamed for.

The reason women are acting more violently, is simply because they get away with it, it really is that simple, they get away with so much that they just expect to never be held accountable for their actions, since they never have been before.

Yep...this is a problem that's definitely on the rise. As you know, I work in an in-patient (residential) drug/alcohol addiction treatment facility, and we have twice as many beds for men as women. This was a set standard because in the past, the facility has had more referrals for men than women. However....since the start of my working there, my observation has been that we've had roughly equivalent numbers of female patients to males.

In fact, we've had to turn many potential female clients away because there are not enough beds set aside for females. Our female beds (rooms) are continuously full. Right now we have 20 beds for men, and 10 for women, and on average we have about 12 men and 10 women filling those beds.

And Harriet Harman and co. want to see women's prisons converted to men's prisons... Hmmm

M - "Officer, that woman just attacked me for no reason, well, I mean, she's pissed out her skull, but I hadn't done anything..."
Officer - "Well me laddy-boy, you're nicked!"
Man - "UH?"
Officer - "Lady Harman done away with prisons for womyn... So I'll arrest you instead for forcing your face into that dear, innocent lamb's fist."

Quote from TERA

Yep...this is a problem that's definitely on the rise. As you know, I work in an in-patient (residential) drug/alcohol addiction treatment facility, and we have twice as many beds for men as women. This was a set standard because in the past, the facility has had more referrals for men than women. However....since the start of my working there, my observation has been that we've had roughly equivalent numbers of female patients to males.

In fact, we've had to turn many potential female clients away because there are not enough beds set aside for females. Our female beds (rooms) are continuously full. Right now we have 20 beds for men, and 10 for women, and on average we have about 12 men and 10 women filling those beds.

This is a result of the fact that no one told feminists that the freedom they wanted (freedom to) as opposed to(freedom from,which they always had), came with the price of responsiblity. Women always used to be answerable to the men in their lives, the heaf of the family (father, brother, husband etc), and the same with children. Men were answerable to society at large. When male children became men then they became answerable to society. The system worked. Men had freedom to, but that came with responsiblity. They never really had freedom from.

Women now have freedom to, but have never been taught the responsiblity. They have never been held answerable to their actions, they have no concept of duty, honour etc.

Women still believe they have freedom from, along with freedom to, which means they think they can do anything and it is always someone else's fault.

By freedom from, I meant freedom from the harsher parts of life, such as work, war, and so on and they relied on their men to fight their battles for them (through the law, through war, through everyday toiling in the field). Men had freedom to do what they wanted and answered only to society, this meant they had to have a greater idea of responsiblity, obligation and duty.

That was my 2 cents.



On a different note. The worst fights I have seen have been between women.

Quote from Sophistry

Women still believe they have freedom from, along with freedom to, which means they think they can do anything and it is always someone else's fault.

I do not expect, that this will change in future.

Society and everything in it, all its Institutions and systems, its infracrtucture, its manufacture and goods and and trade, its protections, its farms, its food is all made by men over dozens of generations.

It is an engine.

It is fueled by men's labour and intelligence. It is lubricated by men's sweat.

It has been on a journey and there is a long way to go.

If you take out some of the fuel and replace it with 'Fragrance' from Estelle Lauder and you take out some of the oil and replace it with Oil of Ulay, there will be side effects.

The most noticeable ones will be the coughing and spluttering of the engine - as we have been noticing for the past twenty years; the heating up of the water in the cooling system and steam coming from the the engine, as we are noticing with the rise in violence; and finally the engine will sieze up.

The pistons will disintegrate and weld themselves to the cylinders.

The engine will be buggered.

From the first splutter to the stop will be a very short time.

It will not be started up again.

Fragrant smoke will not be counted as a 'benefit'.

There may be some scrap value for someone. Maybe not.