Good find Zub!

The comments were interesting because they were just as insanely "inside the box" as the article.

When it comes to gender legislation the philosophical phrase -"reductio ad absurdam" springs to mind.

For the sane men that are still out there - Nihil illegitimaes carborundum! (dog-Latin; Don't let the bastards grind you down!)

Aww poor baby! I wonder what she'd do if she had to live off $1400 bucks a month. lol

Yan, I am astonished. Tell me it was a typo.

The Latin word ending 'ae' is a plural. The English word ending 's' is a plural. One or the other my friend but not both together.

'reductio ad absurdam" now seems only to work when someone has retained some semblance of moral and intellectual mind.

Edward Feser, The LastSuperstition: A Refutation of the New Atheism. St. Augustine’s Press, 2008, p.225.
Feser argues that our secular humanistic thinking has lead to the point where “we are well past the time when slippery-slope arguments might be used to try to shock a liberal or a secularist out of his folly.

You can no longer attempt the reduction ad absurdum with him, for he will now simply embrace with enthusiasm any absurdity that follows from his premises and thank you for suggesting it to him.

He is well through the looking glass, his mind and his moral sensibility so thoroughly corrupted that to him it is obvious that black is white, up is down, sodomy is marriage, and scraping a fetus from its mother’s womb is compassion.”



Substitute 'feminist' and 'her' appropriately. And add ; a woman marrying a woman is simply two wrongs making a right.

This is like watching a friendship between a radical Christian and a radical Muslim.

I have long regarded wimyn as having the soul of a dodder - like a vampire sucking on another vampire