Judging by his actions, it won't be too long until politics is made up of a men's team and a women's team. The men's team will be fixing thing, the women's team will be demanding endless sympathies and promises of spiritual fulfilment or suchlike.

My comment:

Women, worst hit by the cuts? What, by having to retire AT THE SAME AGE as men? Aww, diddums! As per usual, if you don't discriminate IN FAVOUR of women, you stand to be accused of discriminating against them; with these new plans but another example of which.

Rather succinct as, thankfully, the majority of commentors have already spoken out against positive discrimination. Commenting on such articles is a good way of putting our point across, I say.

Best comment IMHO:

More 'positive' discrimination and dribbling, hand-wringing appeasement of feminist sensibilities. Sorry, the myth of the oppressed, victimized woman with no opportunities is passé and starting to backfire. Some people are wrongly assuming that equality of opportunity should result in equality of outcome - real life isn't like that, and it's got nothing to do with gender, and everything to do with ability.

Good!
I thought of a possible response that couldn't possibly get through the censors:

"The Labour Party advises you to vote for a bunch of middle-aged women with seriously bad attitudes and questionable political talent but with inch-thick make-up, into office - for the greater good of the nation. They really don't give a shit about you if you are a man; they just want to keep you working for your wives who also have inch-thick make-up (only when they go out) and abuse you, plus some children that you can't actually prove are yours."

The (past sell-by-date) harridans have already demonstrated:
Women will be preferred over men regardless of merit.
Female delinquents and prisoners will always be more leniently dealt with than males.
Fathers are not worth shit.
In the education system, girls must have preference.

Sluts without brains, education or morality, who spit out multiple children via unknown fathers must be helped through free housing and benefits (from taxpayer funds) simply because they have a vagina, or more importantly - a vagianm-vote. The grandmother that gave birth to the entitlement princess has a vote. The grandfather is probably drinking himself to death, in mourning for a failed life but he has a vote. They all pay tax.

The reluctant father of a slut wife's children considers himself lucky because it's no longer his problem. If the government takes care of them, that's fine.

He misses his kids and would like to spend more time with them instead of just coughing up money to the court that the mother will spend on herself over her children. His earned money is taxed but hers is not.

Judging by his actions, it won't be too long until politics is made up of a men's team and a women's team. The men's team will be fixing thing, the women's team will be demanding endless sympathies and promises of spiritual fulfilment or suchlike.

The men's team is working for the women's team. If they f**k up the men's team will have to pick up the pieces.

The Labour Party was founded on an antiquated adversarial model of workers, yeoman, rebels and innovators versus workmen, citizens, conservatives and overlords. It's a flawed model that feminism skillfully exploited.

If we could see the Labour Party as it truly is, what man in his right mind would vote for it?

Like lambs to the slaughter, millions of men still scratch their little pencil cross in favour of the Labour candidate at voting time to perpetuate male slavery.

Why? Because they are terminally stupid?

Quote from Yan Yan

Why? Because they are terminally stupid?

I am urged to answer yes to that. Allot people do strike me as terminally stupid (I like that way of putting it). people (I mean adults by that) I ought to have an equal or greater understanding of how things work than I do as a 20-year-old...

Thing is, allot people can't look further than their noses are long. They are either too self-centered or too blind to see and grasp the greater picture.

Most people aren't interested in the big picture, or the underlying forces and mechanisms that run society. They're interested in how the candidate looks, his/her body language, how deep their voice is, how aggressive they are, his/her family, and what they're gonna go in the short term to their money and rights.

Political thinking is lost - and with that, civilization's doomed to elect the 'best-looking and sounding' candidate who makes the populace 'feel good', instead of someone with balls and a "fuck you, fuck your momma, fuck your friends, i dont give a shit about none of ya'll so suck my dick and pay me" attitude that'll get shit done in the halls of power

Is that how things are done over there?

This is how they do it in Canada;

Liberal staffer quits over 'smoke for votes' comments

A senior Ontario Liberal campaign staffer caught on tape describing how she offered cigarettes to residents of a Toronto shelter in exchange for votes has quit.

more...
Liberal staffer quits over 'smoke for votes' comments - Ontario Votes 2011 - CBC News

Quote from outdoors

Is that how things are done over there?

This is how they do it in Canada;

Liberal staffer quits over 'smoke for votes' comments

more...
Liberal staffer quits over 'smoke for votes' comments - Ontario Votes 2011 - CBC News

Yep because today my step father just got a 150-175 hundread dollar check from Mc Ginnty as a bride to vote for him and I'm not bullshiting you on that but it was worded as " Extra Help " with winter heating costs or some other such nonsense.

Hell at lest they are being honest enough to show what the real meaning of * Domocratic Elections * is, IE " Vote for me and I'll do you a favour. "

It's all about who and how your bribe the masses then good governce now a days.

I wachted the Labour conference. I have seen a stream of mostly women speakers, making a case for mostly small fringe groups of disaffected minorities, who's perception of victimisation by the majority must be addressed.
I believe the Labour party wants to turn democracy on its head by giving minorities group a bigger say than the electorate majority.
The leader of the party will get nowhere by drooling after the votes of fringe groups concerning themselves with issues which does not concern anyone who is outside their own little world.

NEVO