Notice that the only "female" that even has a clue is the bull dyke? Says alot about girls in edumacation.....

TMOTS

Women shouldn't be voting by default anyway, but neither should men, Only the leader of a house hold should be voting, and that should be determined by the people in the home!!

I have come to favor voting only for land owners. Land owners mostly have some effective intelligence, and most important have a vested interest in their community. It would elminate voting by welfare queens and most females, although the more intelligent females could own land.


Blessings

Bob

Quote from bobx23456

I have come to favor voting only for land owners. Land owners mostly have some effective intelligence, and most important have a vested interest in their community. It would elminate voting by welfare queens and most females, although the more intelligent females could own land.


Blessings

Bob

Bob, This option was seriously looked at by the policy commitee of the now defunct (mostly absorbed by the Conservative Party) Reform Party of Canada.

The problem is that the vast majority of "land owners" use their land as collateral for loans....that would mean that banks and mortgage brokers would be the only ones who could vote.

Quote from MAUS

Bob, This option was seriously looked at by the policy commitee of the now defunct (mostly absorbed by the Conservative Party) Reform Party of Canada.

The problem is that the vast majority of "land owners" use their land as collateral for loans....that would mean that banks and mortgage brokers would be the only ones who could vote.

Indeed not. The land owner should not be confused with some lender who lent the owner money. Voting is for land ownership, someone owning a stake in the community, not for a the usurer lending him money.

The "owner" of record on the tax records is the owner, not the bank. He gets to vote. The bank does not.


There are some details to specify:

Corporations can't vote even if they do own land.

Partnerships owning land may be entitled to 2 votes (but no more) if the land is 2 acres or lager. No thousand person voting scams.

Only 1 vote per person even if he owns land in 2 places.

Blessing

Bob

It is women's day every day nowdays

Notice that the only "female" that even has a clue is the bull dyke? Says alot about girls in edumacation.....

TMOTS
The bull dyke came close to assualting him.Note he had to retreat had he stood his ground that would have escalated.

Yep.. He knows the score.. He is well aware if he had stood his ground, he'd be the bad guy.. no matter what "she" does/did....

Sad really.

TMOTS

Since the Enlightenment it has been fashionable to discuss politics as if there is a theoretically perfect system waiting for us to discover. This is a worthwhile excercise, but it distracts us from the older notion of personal ethics and responsibility.

The best system in the world is only as good as the people in it. We've already seen that allowing women to vote did not bring in a utopia. If the citizens are vicious, then no system will save them from themselves imo.

article from UK's leading Feminazi

http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/...isterhood.html
===========

What sisterhood?

When the privileged women at City Hall snubbed grassroots activists this weekend, the myth that feminists are united was exploded

Cath Elliott


Perhaps it was naivety on my part, but I was really looking forward to this year's International Women's Day. March 8 is the one day of the year when women around the world are truly united, both in celebration of women's achievements, and in protest at the discriminations and abuse we still face. Well, that's what I thought anyway. Events had been organised up and down the country for Saturday, but as far as I was concerned there really was no contest when it came to deciding which ones to attend. There was no way I was going to miss seeing Angela Davis speaking at the Capital Woman Conference and I'd made sure to book my ticket well in advance; from there it was then a short walk down to Trafalgar Square to catch up with the Million Women Rise march and rally.I've never been to a Capital Woman event before, and I have to say I was disappointed. Not by Angela Davis, who was every bit as inspiring as I'd expected, but by the corporate feel of the day and the way it was engineered as a vehicle to promote the Greater London Authority. What was even more disappointing than this however, was that Capital Woman obviously saw the Million Women Rise event as a competitor, threatening to distract women from the GLA's day of glory. Instead of endorsing the march, which was called to protest male violence against women, and helping to promote it to conference delegates, there was no mention of it from anyone on the platform. It was almost as though Million Women Rise wasn't happening, or as if Anni Marjoram, the Mayor's policy advisor on women's issues, had never heard of it. Perhaps the Mayor's office aren't comfortable with the idea of women protesting about rape, domestic violence, so-called honour crimes and all the other forms of violence against women, in a city that sees itself as at the cutting edge of progress on these issues. Or perhaps and more cynically, they had their noses put out of joint because a group of grass roots women activists, who had never organised any events before this, were in danger of bringing more women together than they had ever managed. Whatever the reason, there was certainly no sign of any sisterly solidarity from the bigwigs at the GLA towards the march's organisers. Coaches had been commandeered to bring women into London from towns and cities across the country, and although the turnout wasn't as high as some of us had hoped, Million Women Rise clearly managed to tap into the growing feeling of anger and frustration at the abysmal rape conviction rates and the seemingly endemic violence against women. Like the annual Reclaim the Night march and rally, it gave women the chance to voice this frustration, and to protest about the injustice of the government wasting billions of pounds on the Iraq invasion and bailing out Northern Rock, while rape crisis centres, Southall Black Sisters and other women's sector organisations continue in their struggle to secure funding. While I was standing in Trafalgar Square listening to the speeches and soaking up the atmosphere I noticed a small disturbance off to one side; the English Collective of Prostitutes had shown up and were attempting to take the stage. Complaining that sex workers were being denied a voice at the rally, the ECP seemed determined to disrupt the entire event. A row of stewards barred their way, then tempers flared, and before you could say "prostitution degrades and oppresses women" a scuffle had broken out and a woman had been seriously assaulted by an ECP supporter.I suppose there's a certain irony in an assault taking place at an end violence against women protest, and no doubt the fact that it was an assault perpetrated by one woman against another will give some kind of perverse pleasure to those who are always so quick to point out that violence is not solely a male trait. I've never denied this, but I never expected to be quite so starkly reminded of it. It's laughable to think that some people really believe feminists are a single homogenous group, united by our opposition to the patriarchy. Never was this myth more thoroughly exposed than on this year's International Women's day, when the privileged women at City Hall snubbed grass roots feminist activists, and when the women from the ECP tried to intimidate and shout down women protesting against male violence. Aside from all this I had a great time, and I wouldn't have missed it for the world; but even I have to admit that seeing women behaving in this way towards one another has given me pause for thought. I'm sure we'll all be back to do it again next year, but hopefully by then some lessons will have been learned, not least of which must be that while women united really can be a force for change, divisions and petty infighting will get us nowhere.

I think I have pasted the right one, "set too" at the million woman march in london