Female scientist: "It's kind of fun to say that men are going to die out"

**TheOldOligarch** · 14th-January-2010

Quote from Incognito

Maybe so...but everything were entirely in men's hands from then until now, tell me, why men sit idly by and allow themselves to be objects of ridicule, bias, and discrimination? Why don't they use their power and authority to put things into some sort of logical balance? I know the "elite" run things, and the elite are a small group (mostly men), but for what reasons would they trade the dignity of the 50% of the population (including their own)?

Because the average man is even more powerless than the average woman and it was always thus.

Look, this is the hierarchy of life quality.

High staus man
Woman
Low status man

That is how it goes. Men are, always have been and always will be the only threat to the power of the elites at the top. Any resistance to the expansion or perpetuation of their power will come from men and any and all attempts to usurp that power and replace them will also come from men. Men are the ones the elites have to worry about, feminism is just the latest scheme they've come up with to try and beat us down so they can keep their positions.

**Incognito** · 14th-January-2010

Quote from TheOldOligarch

Because the average man is even more powerless than the average woman and it was always thus.

Look, this is the hierarchy of life quality.

High staus man
Woman
Low status man

That is how it goes. Men are, always have been and always will be the only threat to the power of the elites at the top. Any resistance to the expansion or perpetuation of their power will come from men and any and all attempts to usurp that power and replace them will also come from men. Men are the ones the elites have to worry about, feminism is just the latest scheme they've come up with to try and beat us down so they can keep their positions.

Intereting...what you say about the hierarchy of life quality...but what about the hierarchy of political power and authority?

**TheOldOligarch** · 14th-January-2010

Quote from Incognito

Intereting...what you say about the hierarchy of life quality...but what about the hierarchy of political power and authority?

In that case it goes like this:

High status men
Low status men, Women

**Celtic Druid** · 14th-January-2010

Before men get too impressed with themselves, lead author Jennifer Hughes offers some words of caution: Just because the Y chromosome, which determines gender, is evolving at a speedy rate it doesn't necessarily mean men themselves are more evolved.

But undoubtedly ms Hughes would be lauding proof of women's superiority if it was the X chromosome that was evolving faster. Right? Give a bigot some data and they'll work wonders with it.

Researchers took the most detailed examination of the Y chromosome, which females do not have, of both humans and chimps and found entire sections dramatically different.

What kind of mickey mouse research is this? Of course there's difference, because humans and chimps are different.

There were even entire genes on the human Y chromosome that weren't on the chimp, said Hughes, also of the Whitehead Institute.

Oh really!

This isn't even comparing apples and oranges. Do they expect chimps to evolve at a comparable rate with male humans, at a time when the human race is accelerating faster in it's absorbtion of knowledge and technological achievements?

I dare say if you compared the X chromosome with female chimps you'd find similar 'differences,' you could therefore theoretically extrapolate all kinds of unsubstantiated data to fit an agenda.

A few years ago some researchers even suggested that the Y chromosome was shrinking so that in 50,000 years it would just disappear — and so would men.

Ergo women would also disappear, stupid!

Some researchers suggested? No proof then, just mere suggestion? No guesses what variety of researcher that would be then.

"It's kind of fun to say that men are going to die out, but the science is proving — now that we've got data — that that's not true at all."

Female hyper chauvinism (with a sprinkling of misandry) speculating under the guise of jovial banter. Should such a person be allowed to conduct such research? I get tired of bigots masquerading as credible researchers!

This suggesting that men may have a defective flaw in evolutionary terms only contributes to the idea that men are inherently flawed, inferior, lesser then etc. Hopefully misandrists and bigots will die out and let the planets population progress harmoniously onwards.

Everytime we allow crap like this to slide by without registering any protest - we timidly acquiesce to a compounding of men's dire position.

Let's send a few emails.

http://web.wi.mit.edu/page/Site/LabMembersPage.html

Jennifer Hughes, Ph.D.
Postdoctoral Fellow
617-258-8420
jhughes at wi.mit.edu

**nivek** · 14th-January-2010

Quote from Incognito

Women are 'ignorant apes' and yet most of you men are completely pussy-whipped- and women, via feminism, pretty much run the show.

Hmmm...what's wrong with this picture?

Its a bit like when you let your kids deliberately win at something, you know, it makes them feel better about themselves, only a bit later you realise it was a mistake because you've brought up an arrogant spoilt brat

**Kargan3033** · 15th-January-2010

Just goes to show that men are better then women.
I wonder what the human race will be like in a thousand years, that is if we don't exterimate our asses first.
Will men be so advanced over women that it would be like compairing humans to animals?
Who knows but for right now I'm going to bask in the glory of be a MAN