Quote from frostyboy

Harriet Harman has spoken of her ambitions to sit alongside
Hillary Clinton and Angela Merkel in a global crusade against
sexism.

The radical feminist Harriet (harm a man) Harman is at it again. She was elected based on gender, instead of merit.

Miss Harman said she would seek to enlist the 140 female ministers throughout the EU in a bid to push women's issues.

You don't necessarily need to enlist a lot of women for their concerns to be taken into account. About ministers: it's the person's professional qualities that matter, not their gender.
Furthermore, nowadays there's a lot more Men's Rights topics that are still not being seriously addressed compared to women's issues. Harriet needs to do a reality check.

Global war on sexism?
To call those venomous harridans insane is an understatement.

Quote from JamesBond

You don't necessarily need to enlist a lot of women for their concerns to be taken into account.

People who think this, like HH, obviously assume that simply because a politician is female, she's incompetent, nothing else matters, if she's female, then she must be so incompetent as a politician, since she'll only be interested in looking out for women's needs.
If a male politician only looked out for men's needs, he'd be incompetent, because politicians are there to serve the people, the electorate, regardless of gender, so it's no different for a female.

I'm not spamming, it's totally related, but I wrote this blog recently about women in politics, and I say the same thing there, if women want more women in politics, then they have to be encouraged to become electable to more than half the population, and not just the female half.

It always strikes me as odd that the men on this site have far more confidence in women's abilities than feminists do, it's very strange, you'd think it would be the other way around.

Double, double toil and trouble;
Fire burn, and caldron bubble.

Ah doesn´t Angie look great doing the old "Cactus Jack" *Bang Bang* gesture.....

Besides that, when it comes to more rights to women, Angela is probably the worst politician to lead a country (she heads the only big party that was against a women´s quote on executive boards)

The strange thing is that if you truely wanted equality and an end to sexism, you'd have a coalition of people of different genders all working together globally to achieve such aims.

On the other hand, if you were a man-hating feminist you'd exclude all men from the process and just select women at random.

Harriet Harman has spoken of her ambitions to sit alongside
Hillary Clinton and Angela Merkel in a global crusade against
sexism.

It's most ironic how that very setting holds one of the most potent concentrations of sexism on the planet (not to mention misandry).

Labour's deputy leader wants to establish a group of high-ranking
women, including the U.S. Secretary of State and the German
Chancellor, who would meet regularly to fight for equality.

Sinister stuff!

Miss Harman, the minister for women, said: 'There is, as yet, no international architecture which serves effectively to bring together women leaders who are working for progress along the same lines in each of our own countries. We need to look at how this could be done.'

Democracy demands that international politics is androgynous in it's aspirations, if we allow ideological fanatics like Harman to compartmentalise this longstanding framework then we set forth a process of fragmenting society itself.

She said: 'In the UK we have a new Government Office for Equality - of which I am in charge.

And, in practice it actually achieves the opposite ......inequality!

Miss Harman said she would seek to enlist the 140 female ministers throughout the EU in a bid to push women's issues.

And we all know what Harman's idea of 'women's issues' entails: cue the goose-stepping!

She said: 'By doing this we can ensure the concerns of the 250million women in the EU are taken into account when decisions are made.'

That's hilarious. Practically every euro political decision has to pass through a gynocentric filter before it's implemented - lest the standing government be punished by the female vote at the next election. Isn't it time Harman contrasted REALITY with her 'time warped' 70s feminist gibbering.

She also plans to fight to set up a new UN 'consolidated gender entity body to progress issues concerning women'.

The bigoted dictator seems to be making a lot of lofty plans regarding the UN like she's Napoleon or something.

She's also looking to consolidate a mechanism to facilitate a more efficient means of discrimination. Sounds worryingly familiar!

Tory spokesman Theresa May accused Miss Harman of putting her personal ambitions ahead of the interests of British working women.

She said: 'We want to ensure that issues affecting women are not forgotten but we all need to concentrate on the job in hand if we are to tackle Labour's jobs crisis and mend our broken economy'.

Harman doesn't care about the bigger 'inclusive' picture, just maintaining her fanatical agenda. She could be standing in the midst of a nuclear ravaged wasteland with her skin peeling away, and she'd still be feverishly engrossed in her demonic ranting.

In order to achieve equality of opportunity ( an oft used phrase by feminists) and equal treatment then these formidable women should get rid of affirmative action, VAWA, 'special' guvmunt programs that exclude one sex or the other, funding on the basis of genitals, female domination in education, disequilibrium in pensions and heath funding and the one-eyed biases that Feminism has consistently maintained and extended for the past 50 years.

And bugger the Global aspect; start at home.

Obese chance.

Quote from nivek

Double, double toil and trouble;
Fire burn, and caldron bubble.

""Double, double toil and trouble....""

sure Shakespeare saw them for what they are - hell raisers

the latter day M'enage a Trois ball-breakers above legislating us as bondsman for misandrist wimyn; as a class of useful eunuchs;

it is the trendy sensitive caring sharing new age guys electing them into office paradoxically;

talk about fashioning a whip for ones own back

Harriet Harman is digging her own grave!
All she's doing is creating more enemies!

Something interesting to note, I have asked most women I know, online and offline, if they like, respect or take Harriet Harman seriously, I have yet to receive the answer "Yes", in fact it's quite the opposite, most women can't stand her.

I obviously don't know all the women in the world, but I wonder if anyone here could find one woman who actually likes this man-hater, because I doubt it.

I think Labour will still be in charge after the next election, simply because there are really no alternatives, the Tories are just another bunch of arseholes who don't give a shit about the people, and who also undemocratically use female shortlists, making them just as bad as Labour.
This once great country of ours is going to the dogs.

Quote from 6ame

Something interesting to note, I have asked most women I know, online and offline, if they like, respect or take Harriet Harman seriously, I have yet to receive the answer "Yes", in fact it's quite the opposite, most women can't stand her.

I obviously don't know all the women in the world, but I wonder if anyone here could find one woman who actually likes this man-hater, because I doubt it.

I think Labour will still be in charge after the next election, simply because there are really no alternatives, the Tories are just another bunch of arseholes who don't give a shit about the people, and who also undemocratically use female shortlists, making them just as bad as Labour.
This once great country of ours is going to the dogs.

I think the tories will win the next time, based on the usual logic that unpopular governments are voted OUT of office, regardless of what the alternatives are!!

I think the logical vote for anti-misandrists aught to go to the liberals..

But the vote is a joke anyway!!

I think the logical vote for anti-misandrists aught to go to the liberals..

There's a Freudian slip if ever there was one.

I bet my money on Merkel dismissing Harman as an irritant in the asshole and, Hilary Clinton telling her off "I'm too busy erradicating terrorism from around the world".

As for the other 140 female ministers she wants to enlist, will dismiss her as an "odd item", because in continental Europe "sex is seen as a positive force and that they are all at it like rabbits". In France for example is common for political leaders to be philanderers.

It is the English speaking world the ones to give sex such negative connotations and use sex as a tool to trade advantages, to execute extortions, imprison men on unproven claims of rape, etc.

Harriet Harman is pissing off the pot yet again!

NEVO