Any MRA's in Florida? Time to protest an EXTREMELY sexist law.

**le jacquelope** · 9th-March-2012

Glorida Allred Seeking Ways To Prosecute Limbaugh | TPM Livewire

06:28 PM ESTGlorida Allred Seeking Ways To Prosecute Limbaugh

Gloria Allred has sent a letter to Denise Nieman, the County Prosecutor in West Palm Beach, Florida, on behalf of the Women’s Equal Rights Legal Defense and Education Fund, asking for an investigation into whether Rush Limbaugh violated Florida defamation law when he called Sandra Fluke a "slut" and a "prostitute." Allred cites Section 836.04 of Florida Statute, which says that "whoever speaks of and concerning any woman, married or unmarried, falsely and maliciously imputing to her a want of chastity, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree."

**BobV01** · 9th-March-2012

This is why we need to support Limbaugh. Aldred et al are turning this into a sex v. sex thing as this is the feminists month, look her for tags such as Slut or /Slut Walk and repost the information, girls have done it themselves, Feminazis are attacking Limbaugh for doing what girls have done. The more we let feminists steam roll men the more we should be prepared for reduced liberties for males of any age.

**le jacquelope** · 9th-March-2012

Quote from BobV01

This is why we need to support Limbaugh. Aldred et al are turning this into a sex v. sex thing as this is the feminists month, look her for tags such as Slut or /Slut Walk and repost the information, girls have done it themselves, Feminazis are attacking Limbaugh for doing what girls have done. The more we let feminists steam roll men the more we should be prepared for reduced liberties for males of any age.

Support Limbaugh, NO. He went way over the line by calling her a slut.

Support free speech, yes. The First Amendment protects us against IMPRISONMENT for calling someone a slut.

**NowHearThis** · 9th-March-2012

She should instead go after Bill Maher and Rhandi Rhodes. In case y'all haven't heard, Rhodes suggested that conservative women need to have their ovaries ripped out.

But I know that those two will never get thrown under the bus.............................

**le jacquelope** · 9th-March-2012

Quote from NowHearThis

She should instead go after Bill Maher and Rhandi Rhodes. In case y'all haven't heard, Rhodes suggested that conservative women need to have their ovaries ripped out.

But I know that those two will never get thrown under the bus.............................

Wow, that last one borders on a threat.

**NowHearThis** · 9th-March-2012

Quote from le jacquelope

Wow, that last one borders on a threat.

No, not literally under a bus. Just that they won't be sold out.

**le jacquelope** · 9th-March-2012

Quote from NowHearThis

No, not literally under a bus. Just that they won't be sold out.

Sorry, I meant the ripping out the ovaries thing.

**NowHearThis** · 9th-March-2012

Quote from le jacquelope

Sorry, I meant the ripping out the ovaries thing.

Oh I see. All good.

Seems that misogyny is OK, as long is it comes from the Left.

**Nikonian** · 9th-March-2012

Ironically Maher defended rush (whowouldda known)

**le jacquelope** · 9th-March-2012

Quote from NowHearThis

Oh I see. All good.

Seems that misogyny is OK, as long is it comes from the Left.

Or from women, period. Look at the way Right Winger Pamela Gellar laid into Sandra Fluke.

**felixblue** · 9th-March-2012

Sticks and stones.. How very sad!!

**Marx** · 9th-March-2012

"whoever speaks of and concerning any woman, married or unmarried, falsely and maliciously imputing to her a want of chastity, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree."

antimisandry.com http://antimisandry.com/general-news...#ixzz1obccpV8I

For real?

**Nikonian** · 9th-March-2012

This is why every bill should be read before it becomes law. I'm sure this Easter egg (if it actually exists) came with something bigger like an anti DV law or something. If it is fully real.... WOW!

We have work ahead of us boys..

**themanonthestreet** · 9th-March-2012

Indeed it is:

836.04 Defamation.—Whoever speaks of and concerning
any woman, married or unmarried, falsely and maliciously imputing to her a want
of chastity, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as
provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
History.—s. 1, ch.
3460, 1883; RS 2419; GS 3260; RGS 5091; CGL 7193; s. 990, ch. 71-136.

Funny how loons like this have no issue with using archaic laws that missed updating/editing (clue is the talk of a woman's chastity).. Yet if you read some of the other statutes, you can see that they were obviously updated with the his/her "gender parity" crap...

Funny that.

TMOTS

**Douglas** · 9th-March-2012

I agree that the law should be repealed (if it isn't already amended by some covering law that made all prior laws gender neutral).

However, I don't think many people these days would want to - or could even claim to - be chaste. It's just not 'cool' to be chaste, for most meanings of the word.

chaste
adjective, chast·er, chast·est.
1. refraining from sexual intercourse that is regarded as contrary to morality or religion; virtuous.
2. virgin.
3. not engaging in sexual relations; celibate.
4. free from obscenity; decent
5. undefiled or stainless

adj
1. not having experienced sexual intercourse; virginal
2. abstaining from sexual intercourse, esp that which is unlawful or immoral
3. (of conduct, speech, etc) pure; decent; modest
4. (of style or taste) free from embellishment; simple; restrained