26th-July-2008
|
 | Men's rights activist | | | |
I came across this blog entry which was written by Labour MEP Mary Honeyball: Rising female crime
The Melanie Phillips article she refers to can be found here: Whatever happened to girls? Quote: Crime is indefensible. Committing crime is wrong and offenders must be brought to book in whatever way is appropriate for the crime they committed, the way we view that crime and the various rules and regulations about sentencing convicted offenders. I would never agree to any criminal being given an easy rise. Having spent some time in the Probation Service before becoming an MEP, I have seen the effects of crime first hand.
It is not possible to gloss over the increase in crime, particularly violent crime, amongst young women. Crime by young women and girls has risen by 25 percent. According to a report from the Youth Justice Board the number of crimes committed by girls aged ten to 17 climbed from 47,000 to 59,000 between 2003-4 and 2006-7. The figure for boys over the same period went down slightly from 240,000 to 236,000.
The proportional rise in female crime while that for young men has decreased is worrying. Predictably the Daily Mail's resident siren anti-woman, anti-Labour voice, Melanie Phillips, has waded in, ranting on 12 May, "As a result of the feminist revolution, women have commandeered the freedoms and entitlements of the masculine world - while men themselves have now been largely reduced to sperm banks, walking wallets and occasional au pairs."
Notwithstanding the arrant nonsense of Ms Phillips's last couple of lines, her main contention - that feminism has made women more like men - needs addressing. There is no doubt that there has been a convergence between male and female behaviour. Young women now outperform young men at school. Women enter the labour market in much the same way as men. Equal pay legislation and improved childcare have allowed women to develop their careers, although more still needs to be done.
All this has helped our economy as well as providing fulfilment for women. Both men and women who are from generations younger than Ms Phillips's baby boomers, take women's participation in the world of work as a given. I doubt they would want women to stay at home tied to the kitchen sink as Ms Phillips hints at another point in her article, even if they could afford it. Interestingly Melanie Phillips herself earns a decent crust, presumably unencumbered by outdated notions of a woman's place.
Now that women go to work and may take part in our society more or less on a par with men, we are finding that there is a downside - female crime is going up. This is obviously not desirable and we must all work to reduce crime. The Daily Mail blaming modern feminism does nothing to help. | |
|
|
