20th-August-2008
|
 | Men's rights activist | | | |
From the blog "The Disillusioned Liberal": On gender gaps Quote:
The A-level results came out this week, and apparently the gap between boys’ and girls’ results has narrowed slightly. Good news, I think. But a few things have occurred to me.
Whenever boys’ lack of achievement in school is discussed, the same thing is usually blamed: boys’ “laddish” and anti-learning culture.1 Boys’ failure is entirely their own fault and their own responsibility.
But when the gender pay gap is brought up - women working full time earning 17% less on average than men working full time - something must be done, preferably by legislation.2
So adult women are less responsible for the consequences of their own choices than male children? That can’t be right, surely.
The gender pay gap is usually used to demonstrate discrimination against women. I believe that, looked at in context, it actually shows the opposite. Bear with me.
Women working full time, on average, apparently earn 17.2% less than men working full time.3 This is because working mothers, for good practical reasons, tend to choose jobs they can combine with their duties as a parent, which means jobs that are less demanding of their time - no unexpected late nights, flexible enough to take time off at short notice - therefore less responsible, and lower paid.
They do this because they have the option to, and because they can afford to.
Men simply do not have the same options or choices in the workplace as women. That’s partly law, and partly social attitudes. An employer will cut a female employee plenty of slack if she has to take plenty of time off to take care of her children. He will not do so for a male employee. Any man judged to lack ambition will be quickly sidelined, and probably made redundant, with no risk of a discrimination lawsuit. Social pressure also comes from women, who rarely choose to start a family with a man without earning potential. Those men who want to be house-husbands or secondary earners/primary carers are therefore less likely to have children. And bringing up a family costs money, so if mum reduces her earning potential, guess who’s going to have to work harder?
Meanwhile, women are responsible for something like 80% of all consumer spending.4 If they can earn a fifth less than men but spend four times as much, then the shortfall in earnings is obviously not causing women to suffer financially.
In fact, using 17.2% as the pay gap and 77% (as per the Euromonitor link) as the spending gap, women spend 100% of the money they earn, and 53.49% - more than half - of the money men earn! And while women get flexible working hours, men are chained to their jobs. Which sex gets the better of this deal again?
Footnotes
1. See, for example, Andrew Cunningham in the Independent.
2. For example, Jackie Ashley in the Guardian.
3. That’s the mean, according to the government’s Equalities department. The median is 12.6%.
4. That’s the figure normally given for the USA. Visa say “Women control £400 million more expenditure than men every week” in the UK. I can’t find that expressed as a percentage, but Euromonitor says that “women are the primary spenders in 77% of consumer markets” in the 35 countries they surveyed.
| |
|
|
