Luckily there are some classes around that can teach men how to feed themselves. The skill begins with locating your nearest supermarket and learning the difference between a microwave and a budgie cage.

Not in my case. I was able to read in the face of my ex whether there was a meal to be had. When the reading was negative, without a word, I prepared my own meal and the children's if that was the case. Strangely, she would resent my attitude. A long time after began to dawn on me that I was violating her efforts to dominate me through hunger, because of this, she'll be in a foul mood for some time to come.

Go figure!!!!

NEVO

Male starvation is a huge problem. The opposite sex needs to woman up and handle their responsibilities.

FACT: Every 3.5 seconds, a man is starved
FACT: 1 in 4 men under the age of 25 will be murdered by starvation
FACT: Starvation by women is the leading killer of males 35 - 79
FACT: Starvation is a "midway" form of abuse, oft heralded by verbal abuse and coercion into nuptials and followed by cuckoldry and physical abuse

If you've been or are being starved by a partner, it is NOT your fault, and it is NOT love. It is a crime, punishable by up to 30 years prison time. You are not alone, there is help. 'MRAnonymous' has set up men's shelters in New York, London, Paris, and Berlin, with hot meals. Every year, over 1 billion men are prevented from starvation related death in large part due to men's support groups. You will be taken care of; the government has taken a no-tolerance stance on nutritional abuse.

I understand the point you're trying to make. It doesn't quite work, though.

You do have to have food to live.

You don't have to have sex.

You're missing the point KM.. it's not about food or sex... it's about talking BS and using it to spread lies about men/women.

However, one of the stories is a joke and made abundantly clear it's only mocking the other, which happens to be considerably hateful & bigoted but taken seriously by so many.

Quote from Marx

You're missing the point KM.. it's not about food or sex... it's about talking BS and using it to spread lies about men/women.

However, one of the stories is a joke and made abundantly clear it's only mocking the other, which happens to be considerably hateful & bigoted but taken seriously by so many.

Quite so. The point is that it is perfectly reasonable for most women, especially working women of unemployed husbands to have said "no" or "later" when asked to provide food. Yet this can be conflated into something terrible by:
1) including other things in the same question ("or otherwise denied letting him have food") which implies something worse.
2) not measuring the frequency, so a woman having once said "later, dear" to her beloved husband of 30 years is made out to be some kind of monster.
3) not asking about the circumstances, so even if regular it could be because she's just arrived home tired after a hard day's work.
4) not examining the outcome, which in this case is most likely that he'd either wait or get some food for himself. The outcome (starvation) is only - and negative - assumption.
5) making the situation look worse by either making up other statistics ("starvation is the number one killer of men aged 21 through 45") or, if that is a real figure, not explaining the limit of the statistics (such as stating that starvation is the number one killer of men aged 21 through 45 in the four weeks following a major flood in a third world country).
6) exaggerating the social impact by implying social action is needed (calls for government action, marches 'planned' etc.).
7) usually omitting the equivalent of the last paragraph in the original post, which would otherwise highlight the biased basis and the untrustworthiness of the data.

These tactics (and some others) can be seen again and again. They are not unique to feminism but are widely deployed by feminists. Wherever statistics are quoted or 'studies' claimed, one should ALWAYS look into the background because otherwise the brain will accept the subliminal message without proper caution.

I have worked with guys who literally had no money for lunch as their wives controlled the money and spent so much that there was nothing left. Why married men turn their paychecks over to their wives is beyond me. I would determine how much she needed for grocery shopping, etc. and give her only what she needed. I would keep the rest for myself in a secure and separate account. How can someone work & make money, turn it over to another person, and then essentially beg that second person for a handout. That's called being a slave.

Meh, it's their paychecks, if they want to give full control to their wives it's their choice.

All of those women need to be in jail. If I could feed all those men, I would.

Quote from haute macabre

All of those women need to be in jail. If I could feed all those men, I would.

You're a funny one.

Quote from KellyMac

I understand the point you're trying to make. It doesn't quite work, though.

You do have to have food to live.

You don't have to have sex.

Um... yes I do. Perhaps I wont die, but my quality of life will lower to the extent I wish I were dead anyway. Sexual release in some form is what many males would deem necessary.

Quote from Black Knight

Meh, it's their paychecks, if they want to give full control to their wives it's their choice.

The fact that many men do it without thinking is disturbing and demonstrates that men feel obligated to do so.

Quote from Dylan MacVillain

The fact that many men do it without thinking is disturbing and demonstrates that men feel obligated to do so.

Or they've chosen a controller, and for whatever reason choose to remain with them. Maybe they have children?

Quote from Black Knight

Um... yes I do. Perhaps I wont die, but my quality of life will lower to the extent I wish I were dead anyway. Sexual release in some form is what many males would deem necessary.

Wrong! Sex is not mandatory nor is it necessary. Having obscene amounts of sex with multiple women doesn't make one a better person like the second wave feminists would have you believe.

Quote from Dylan MacVillain

The fact that many men do it without thinking is disturbing and demonstrates that men feel obligated to do so.

Yes and many of those men you speak of, are manginas that can't function above a base biological instinct. In other words, they're no better than impulse driven primates! The same can be said for new age women who only chase after men with huge bank accounts.