Sarah's law will receive very little oppostion, if any, from all groups and organisations except of course the Men's Rights movements, but what the hell does that matter anyway in the wider scheme of things?
It really does piss me off big time that any Men's Rights organisation is dismissed out of hand as just loopy groups of "disaffected males" consisting only of "losers, inadequates or out and out misogynists", and those who think this way, or profess to think this way, includes a whole lot of misguided mangina type "men" too scared to be seen not to toe the feminazi line. You see them all the time in these TV chat shows, warily treading on egg shells trying hard not to be seen "offending" the females on the show while they (the females) have a free rein to say what the hell they like about the male of the species and receive not so much as a verbal "slapped wrist" for soing so - fine examples of permitted misandry in action. The name Steve Wright comes to mind right now - he with the inane permagrin. Jeremy Kyle is another like minded idiot who makes a living out of it all.
I never knew about this sex offender case in Cambridgeshire - no surprise there as it hasn't been given any publicity nationwide - this report does come from a local Cambridge newspaper does it not? No surprise again - the offender was
female after all, so that totally precludes it being given any space at all in the media - certaibnly not in thgat crapsheet the Daily Telegraph. They usually relish cases like this with full coverage with pictures - but only if the offender is male. They go to town with coverage on male sex offender cases, but anything involving female perpetrators merits a tiny little paragraph hidden at the bottom of page 5 or 6, if that - they may well choose not to publish it at all. As far as I know not a peep from them on this Cambridgeshire case.
http://cambridgenews.portalconstruct....asp?ID=249564 
17th-February-2008
