The following list are examples of well-known lies and laws that femcunts like to promote, and why they are wrong, and discriminatory, to do so.

I’ll be addressing: The Vote, Battered Woman Defence, Rape Shield Laws, Health, The Violence Against Women Act and The Infanticide Act.

This article serves to show what is entailed within said areas.

I’ve written about these in the past, and have even referred to them in the shorthand.

However, this is specifically a reference for critics, dummies and retards who don’t understand what it means to say Battered Woman Defence-

I.e. They don’t ‘get’ why this is biased against men.

They need it explained to them- so I’m doing it here.

LOL

Anyway- let’s begin:

The Vote (UK)

Feminists say: Women have been discriminated against because they could never vote.

Fred X says: False.

Let’s go back to the real beginnings of suffrage- 1430- where landowners, of either sex, and who owned land worth 40 shillings or more were eligible to vote.

The law was gender neutral and did NOT stipulate ONLY men could vote:

"The Act of 1430, after declaring that elections had been crowded by many persons of low estate, and that confusion had thereby resulted, accordingly enacted that the suffrage should be limited to persons qualified by a freehold of 40s". Seymour, C. (1915) Electoral Reform in England and Wales.

In more recent years the common man was only allowed to vote after he put his life on the line during World War 1- introduced through the Representation of the People Act 1918.

The common woman got this reward by moaning and whining via feminism in 1928.

They weren’t forced to pay the same price as men.

Not even 11 years later, when WW2 broke out.

Further reading:

Allexperts.com- Representation of the People Act 1918

Bartleby- Act Overview


Battered Woman Defence

Feminists say: It helps women who are victims to protect themselves.

Fred X says: It gives them a licence to murder more like.

Under this get-out-clause, women who commit murder on their husbands can avoid the lengthy prison sentence they would have otherwise received for their actions.

This get-out-clause was coined by a feminist called Dr. Lenore Walker, who undertook a ‘study’ (lol) on a portion of alleged ‘battered’ women to make her case.

Quote:

“Walker conducted interviews with 435 women in the Rocky Mountain Region of Colorado, USA, each of whom had been, or were at the time, victims of domestic violence. These interviews were conducted with a view to identifying key sociological and psychological factors that made up the proposed battered woman syndrome but were also aimed at testing two specific theories about battered women – the cycle theory of battering and an adaptation of Martin Seligman’s learned helplessness theory.”

Source: Battered Woman Syndrome PDF

The pathetic thing is- it got accepted- and is now used by women to get away with murder.

Just ask Kiranjit Ahluwalia

And those other celebrity misandrists who pander to her in the movie industry.

Source: Killer Awarded

It's been used in the past- and it will only be used more in the future- unless stopped.

What also pisses me off is the fact that femcunts are forever inventing new ways to get women off the hook- and instead of using neutral terms like 'person' or 'people'- they instead split men and women in opposition to one another.

Well- that is their goal- LOL.

And they continue on this relentless path of bias, i.e. trying to get men thrown in jail for not wearing condoms, just so they can fuck up more lives.

Source: His Side- Reckless Sex Bill

Yes-

THAT'S what we're up against.

And don't believe anyone when they say these kinds of Acts are good for everyone- as you only need look to the title itself in half these cases to see what their agenda is.

And idiots who initially thought such Acts may benefit men as well have been forced to admit that there is specific gender bias when it comes to these things.
Why?

Because femcunts are spiteful- and they use women's 'victimhood' mentality to their own advantage.

Further reading:

Walker, L. (1979) The Battered Woman.

SociScho Papers

Allexperts.com- Battered Woman Defence


Rape Shield laws

Feminists say: They ensure women are protected fairly during rape trials.

Fred X says: Fuck you

Rape Shield laws are biased against men because they:

- Give women total anonymity when they make an allegation

- Hide a woman’s past sexual history, accusations and/or lies

- Deny a man's right to face his accuser in court

Men, therefore, are not given equality under the law.

It really is that simple.

Further Reading:

Minnlawyer.com

Wikipedia- Rape Shield Law


Health – Male Vs. Female

Feminists say: Gender is not a deciding factor on who gets the most funding.

Fred X says: Bullshit.

UK figures:

Prostate cancer kills 10,000 men per year, with 32,000 diagnoses. It makes up 12% of all cancers. (2007)

Source: Cancer Research UK- Prostate Cancer

Breast cancer kills 12,500 women per year, with 44,100 diagnoses. It makes up 16% of all cancers. (2007)

Source: Cancer Research UK- Breast Cancer

So- how much funding goes into said cancers?

A:

“According to the most recent available figures, total research spending by the government and the leading charity in the field comes to £36.8m a year for breast cancer against £9.7m for prostate cancer.

In addition, the NHS spends £72m annually on the national breast screening programme but there is no such scheme for prostate cancer.

The government spends £4.2m a year on prostate cancer research. While it does not disclose how much is spent every year on breast cancer, the figure is estimated to be at least £12m.” Men Lose Out in Battle For Cancer Cash. Templeton, S. (2005) Medical Correspondent

Source:

Timesonline- Templeton, S.

Hmm

Not exactly balanced is it.

In fact- it’s disgraceful.

Looking at US figures:

Prostate cancer: 234,460 cases per year.

Source: Cdmrp Sheets

Breast cancer: 211,240 cases per year.

Source: Cdmrp Sheets

Funding:

Prostate cancer: $80m per year

Breast cancer: $127.5m per year

Source: Cdmrp Funding

And- just like in the UK- this is all government funded.

That means through men's taxes.

To go on all things women- yet never things men.

Adding insult to injury, the Stamp Out Breast Cancer Act serves to help women, found here: SOBCA Sheet

Where’s the Stamp Out Prostate Cancer Act then?

It never existed- that’s where.


The Violence Against Women Act

Feminists say: It’s needed to protect female victims of domestic violence.

Fred X says: Get fucked femcunt. This is yet another piece of legislation to benefit women over men.

By creating a law like VAWA the gorvernment is stipulating that ONLY men are capable of violence and that ONLY women can be victims of it.

And within said Act various prosecution grants and services are promoted, such as shelters, that are available to women-only.

As an example, let's look at sub-areas of particular bias listed in Title I: Continuing the Commitment of The Violence Against Women Act.

“ Sub. A- Law Enforcement and Prosecution Grants to Combat Violence Against Women

Sub. C- Battered Women’s Shelters and Services

Sub. E- Education and Training for Judges and Court Personnel

Sub. F- Grants To Encourage Arrest Policies”

Source: VAWA PDF

Men just don’t matter you see.

We make useful scapegoats and figures of hate though.

As is the case with VAWA.

But I’m not surprised.

And this bile continues throughout the other 8 Titles, which do nothing but pander to women- whilst targeting men.

Further reading:

Titles of VAWA


The Infanticide Act

Feminists say: Mothers may act out of desperation to kill their newborns.

Fred X says: You’ve got your abortion legalised already cunt, and now you get to kill your kids after they are born.

Short quotes from Wiki:

“The Infanticide Act effectively abolished the death penalty for a woman who deliberately killed her new born child while the balance of her mind was disturbed as a result of giving birth, by providing a partial defence to murder.”

And

“In recent years it has become very rare for a mother who kills her infant child to receive a custodial sentence, save in very exceptional circumstances.”

Source: Wikipedia- Infanticide Act

Now- if men ever harmed their children- they would not only be demonised, but jailed too.

Women get neither.

In fact- quite the opposite.

So if you think women aren't given special treatment- think again.

It seems they can murder children when they are born OR unborn doesn't it.

Further reading:

Irish Statute

Swarb- Infanticide Act

---

So, there you have it- various areas where feminists have lied and where women are favoured and/or given special treatment, whereas men are not.

So if you see me referring to such things in the short hand- and you dare tell me I have made all this up- I’ll be directing you to 2 things:

1) This article

And

2) My arsehole- for any further queries you may have

This piece is for all you fuckers out there who think MRA’s don’t have grounds for complaint- and you can kiss my arse.

--

PS- Get fucked.

More...

The following list are examples of well-known lies and laws that femcunts like to promote, and why they are wrong, and discriminatory, to do so.

I’ll be addressing: The Vote, Battered Woman Defence, Rape Shield Laws, Health, The Violence Against Women Act and The Infanticide Act.

This article serves to show what is entailed within said areas.

I’ve written about these in the past, and have even referred to them in the shorthand.

However, this is specifically a reference for critics, dummies and retards who don’t understand what it means to say Battered Woman Defence-

I.e. They don’t ‘get’ why this is biased against men.

They need it explained to them- so I’m doing it here.

LOL

Anyway- let’s begin:

The Vote (UK)

Feminists say: Women have been discriminated against because they could never vote.

Fred X says: False.

Let’s go back to the real beginnings of suffrage- 1430- where landowners, of either sex, and who owned land worth 40 shillings or more were eligible to vote.

The law was gender neutral and did NOT stipulate ONLY men could vote:

"The Act of 1430, after declaring that elections had been crowded by many persons of low estate, and that confusion had thereby resulted, accordingly enacted that the suffrage should be limited to persons qualified by a freehold of 40s". Seymour, C. (1915) Electoral Reform in England and Wales.

In more recent years the common man was only allowed to vote after he put his life on the line during World War 1- introduced through the Representation of the People Act 1918.

The common woman got this reward by moaning and whining via feminism in 1928.

They weren’t forced to pay the same price as men.

Not even 11 years later, when WW2 broke out.

Further reading:

Allexperts.com- Representation of the People Act 1918

Bartleby- Act Overview


Battered Woman Defence

Feminists say: It helps women who are victims to protect themselves.

Fred X says: It gives them a licence to murder more like.

Under this get-out-clause, women who commit murder on their husbands can avoid the lengthy prison sentence they would have otherwise received for their actions.

This get-out-clause was coined by a feminist called Dr. Lenore Walker, who undertook a ‘study’ (lol) on a portion of alleged ‘battered’ women to make her case.

Quote:

“Walker conducted interviews with 435 women in the Rocky Mountain Region of Colorado, USA, each of whom had been, or were at the time, victims of domestic violence. These interviews were conducted with a view to identifying key sociological and psychological factors that made up the proposed battered woman syndrome but were also aimed at testing two specific theories about battered women – the cycle theory of battering and an adaptation of Martin Seligman’s learned helplessness theory.”

Source: Battered Woman Syndrome PDF

The pathetic thing is- it got accepted- and is now used by women to get away with murder.

Just ask Kiranjit Ahluwalia

And those other celebrity misandrists who pander to her in the movie industry.

Source: Killer Awarded

It's been used in the past- and it will only be used more in the future- unless stopped.

What also pisses me off is the fact that femcunts are forever inventing new ways to get women off the hook- and instead of using neutral terms like 'person' or 'people'- they instead split men and women in opposition to one another.

Well- that is their goal- LOL.

And they continue on this relentless path of bias, i.e. trying to get men thrown in jail for not wearing condoms, just so they can fuck up more lives.

Source: His Side- Reckless Sex Bill

Yes-

THAT'S what we're up against.

And don't believe anyone when they say these kinds of Acts are good for everyone- as you only need look to the title itself in half these cases to see what their agenda is.

And idiots who initially thought such Acts may benefit men as well have been forced to admit that there is specific gender bias when it comes to these things.
Why?

Because femcunts are spiteful- and they use women's 'victimhood' mentality to their own advantage.

Further reading:

Walker, L. (1979) The Battered Woman.

SociScho Papers

Allexperts.com- Battered Woman Defence


Rape Shield laws

Feminists say: They ensure women are protected fairly during rape trials.

Fred X says: Fuck you

Rape Shield laws are biased against men because they:

- Give women total anonymity when they make an allegation

- Hide a woman’s past sexual history, accusations and/or lies

- Deny a man's right to face his accuser in court

Men, therefore, are not given equality under the law.

It really is that simple.

Further Reading:

Minnlawyer.com

Wikipedia- Rape Shield Law


Health – Male Vs. Female

Feminists say: Gender is not a deciding factor on who gets the most funding.

Fred X says: Bullshit.

UK figures:

Prostate cancer kills 10,000 men per year, with 32,000 diagnoses. It makes up 12% of all cancers. (2007)

Source: Cancer Research UK- Prostate Cancer

Breast cancer kills 12,500 women per year, with 44,100 diagnoses. It makes up 16% of all cancers. (2007)

Source: Cancer Research UK- Breast Cancer

So- how much funding goes into said cancers?

A:

“According to the most recent available figures, total research spending by the government and the leading charity in the field comes to £36.8m a year for breast cancer against £9.7m for prostate cancer.

In addition, the NHS spends £72m annually on the national breast screening programme but there is no such scheme for prostate cancer.

The government spends £4.2m a year on prostate cancer research. While it does not disclose how much is spent every year on breast cancer, the figure is estimated to be at least £12m.” Men Lose Out in Battle For Cancer Cash. Templeton, S. (2005) Medical Correspondent

Source:

Timesonline- Templeton, S.

Hmm

Not exactly balanced is it.

In fact- it’s disgraceful.

Looking at US figures:

Prostate cancer: 234,460 cases per year.

Source: Cdmrp Sheets

Breast cancer: 211,240 cases per year.

Source: Cdmrp Sheets

Funding:

Prostate cancer: $80m per year

Breast cancer: $127.5m per year

Source: Cdmrp Funding

And- just like in the UK- this is all government funded.

That means through men's taxes.

To go on all things women- yet never things men.

Adding insult to injury, the Stamp Out Breast Cancer Act serves to help women, found here: SOBCA Sheet

Where’s the Stamp Out Prostate Cancer Act then?

It never existed- that’s where.


The Violence Against Women Act

Feminists say: It’s needed to protect female victims of domestic violence.

Fred X says: Get fucked femcunt. This is yet another piece of legislation to benefit women over men.

By creating a law like VAWA the gorvernment is stipulating that ONLY men are capable of violence and that ONLY women can be victims of it.

And within said Act various prosecution grants and services are promoted, such as shelters, that are available to women-only.

As an example, let's look at sub-areas of particular bias listed in Title I: Continuing the Commitment of The Violence Against Women Act.

“ Sub. A- Law Enforcement and Prosecution Grants to Combat Violence Against Women

Sub. C- Battered Women’s Shelters and Services

Sub. E- Education and Training for Judges and Court Personnel

Sub. F- Grants To Encourage Arrest Policies”

Source: VAWA PDF

Men just don’t matter you see.

We make useful scapegoats and figures of hate though.

As is the case with VAWA.

But I’m not surprised.

And this bile continues throughout the other 8 Titles, which do nothing but pander to women- whilst targeting men.

Further reading:

Titles of VAWA


The Infanticide Act

Feminists say: Mothers may act out of desperation to kill their newborns.

Fred X says: You’ve got your abortion legalised already cunt, and now you get to kill your kids after they are born.

Short quotes from Wiki:

“The Infanticide Act effectively abolished the death penalty for a woman who deliberately killed her new born child while the balance of her mind was disturbed as a result of giving birth, by providing a partial defence to murder.”

And

“In recent years it has become very rare for a mother who kills her infant child to receive a custodial sentence, save in very exceptional circumstances.”

Source: Wikipedia- Infanticide Act

Now- if men ever harmed their children- they would not only be demonised, but jailed too.

Women get neither.

In fact- quite the opposite.

So if you think women aren't given special treatment- think again.

It seems they can murder children when they are born OR unborn doesn't it.

Further reading:

Irish Statute

Swarb- Infanticide Act

---

So, there you have it- various areas where feminists have lied and where women are favoured and/or given special treatment, whereas men are not.

So if you see me referring to such things in the short hand- and you dare tell me I have made all this up- I’ll be directing you to 2 things:

1) This article

And

2) My arsehole- for any further queries you may have

This piece is for all you fuckers out there who think MRA’s don’t have grounds for complaint- and you can kiss my arse.

--

PS- Get fucked.

More...

The following list are examples of well-known lies and laws that femcunts like to promote, and why they are wrong, and discriminatory, to do so.

I’ll be addressing: The Vote, Battered Woman Defence, Rape Shield Laws, Health, The Violence Against Women Act and The Infanticide Act.

This article serves to show what is entailed within said areas.

I’ve written about these in the past, and have even referred to them in the shorthand.

However, this is specifically a reference for critics, dummies and retards who don’t understand what it means to say Battered Woman Defence-

I.e. They don’t ‘get’ why this is biased against men.

They need it explained to them- so I’m doing it here.

LOL

Anyway- let’s begin:

The Vote (UK)

Feminists say: Women have been discriminated against because they could never vote.

Fred X says: False.

Let’s go back to the real beginnings of suffrage- 1430- where landowners, of either sex, and who owned land worth 40 shillings or more were eligible to vote.

The law was gender neutral and did NOT stipulate ONLY men could vote:

"The Act of 1430, after declaring that elections had been crowded by many persons of low estate, and that confusion had thereby resulted, accordingly enacted that the suffrage should be limited to persons qualified by a freehold of 40s". Seymour, C. (1915) Electoral Reform in England and Wales.

In more recent years the common man was only allowed to vote after he put his life on the line during World War 1- introduced through the Representation of the People Act 1918.

The common woman got this reward by moaning and whining via feminism in 1928.

They weren’t forced to pay the same price as men.

Not even 11 years later, when WW2 broke out.

Further reading:

Allexperts.com- Representation of the People Act 1918

Bartleby- Act Overview


Battered Woman Defence

Feminists say: It helps women who are victims to protect themselves.

Fred X says: It gives them a licence to murder more like.

Under this get-out-clause, women who commit murder on their husbands can avoid the lengthy prison sentence they would have otherwise received for their actions.

This get-out-clause was coined by a feminist called Dr. Lenore Walker, who undertook a ‘study’ (lol) on a portion of alleged ‘battered’ women to make her case.

Quote:

“Walker conducted interviews with 435 women in the Rocky Mountain Region of Colorado, USA, each of whom had been, or were at the time, victims of domestic violence. These interviews were conducted with a view to identifying key sociological and psychological factors that made up the proposed battered woman syndrome but were also aimed at testing two specific theories about battered women – the cycle theory of battering and an adaptation of Martin Seligman’s learned helplessness theory.”

Source: Battered Woman Syndrome PDF

The pathetic thing is- it got accepted- and is now used by women to get away with murder.

Just ask Kiranjit Ahluwalia

And those other celebrity misandrists who pander to her in the movie industry.

Source: Killer Awarded

It's been used in the past- and it will only be used more in the future- unless stopped.

What also pisses me off is the fact that femcunts are forever inventing new ways to get women off the hook- and instead of using neutral terms like 'person' or 'people'- they instead split men and women in opposition to one another.

Well- that is their goal- LOL.

And they continue on this relentless path of bias, i.e. trying to get men thrown in jail for not wearing condoms, just so they can fuck up more lives.

Source: His Side- Reckless Sex Bill

Yes-

THAT'S what we're up against.

And don't believe anyone when they say these kinds of Acts are good for everyone- as you only need look to the title itself in half these cases to see what their agenda is.

And idiots who initially thought such Acts may benefit men as well have been forced to admit that there is specific gender bias when it comes to these things.
Why?

Because femcunts are spiteful- and they use women's 'victimhood' mentality to their own advantage.

Further reading:

Walker, L. (1979) The Battered Woman.

SociScho Papers

Allexperts.com- Battered Woman Defence


Rape Shield laws

Feminists say: They ensure women are protected fairly during rape trials.

Fred X says: Fuck you

Rape Shield laws are biased against men because they:

- Give women total anonymity when they make an allegation

- Hide a woman’s past sexual history, accusations and/or lies

- Deny a man's right to face his accuser in court

Men, therefore, are not given equality under the law.

It really is that simple.

Further Reading:

Minnlawyer.com

Wikipedia- Rape Shield Law


Health – Male Vs. Female

Feminists say: Gender is not a deciding factor on who gets the most funding.

Fred X says: Bullshit.

UK figures:

Prostate cancer kills 10,000 men per year, with 32,000 diagnoses. It makes up 12% of all cancers. (2007)

Source: Cancer Research UK- Prostate Cancer

Breast cancer kills 12,500 women per year, with 44,100 diagnoses. It makes up 16% of all cancers. (2007)

Source: Cancer Research UK- Breast Cancer

So- how much funding goes into said cancers?

A:

“According to the most recent available figures, total research spending by the government and the leading charity in the field comes to £36.8m a year for breast cancer against £9.7m for prostate cancer.

In addition, the NHS spends £72m annually on the national breast screening programme but there is no such scheme for prostate cancer.

The government spends £4.2m a year on prostate cancer research. While it does not disclose how much is spent every year on breast cancer, the figure is estimated to be at least £12m.” Men Lose Out in Battle For Cancer Cash. Templeton, S. (2005) Medical Correspondent

Source:

Timesonline- Templeton, S.

Hmm

Not exactly balanced is it.

In fact- it’s disgraceful.

Looking at US figures:

Prostate cancer: 234,460 cases per year.

Source: Cdmrp Sheets

Breast cancer: 211,240 cases per year.

Source: Cdmrp Sheets

Funding:

Prostate cancer: $80m per year

Breast cancer: $127.5m per year

Source: Cdmrp Funding

And- just like in the UK- this is all government funded.

That means through men's taxes.

To go on all things women- yet never things men.

Adding insult to injury, the Stamp Out Breast Cancer Act serves to help women, found here: SOBCA Sheet

Where’s the Stamp Out Prostate Cancer Act then?

It never existed- that’s where.


The Violence Against Women Act

Feminists say: It’s needed to protect female victims of domestic violence.

Fred X says: Get fucked femcunt. This is yet another piece of legislation to benefit women over men.

By creating a law like VAWA the gorvernment is stipulating that ONLY men are capable of violence and that ONLY women can be victims of it.

And within said Act various prosecution grants and services are promoted, such as shelters, that are available to women-only.

As an example, let's look at sub-areas of particular bias listed in Title I: Continuing the Commitment of The Violence Against Women Act.

“ Sub. A- Law Enforcement and Prosecution Grants to Combat Violence Against Women

Sub. C- Battered Women’s Shelters and Services

Sub. E- Education and Training for Judges and Court Personnel

Sub. F- Grants To Encourage Arrest Policies”

Source: VAWA PDF

Men just don’t matter you see.

We make useful scapegoats and figures of hate though.

As is the case with VAWA.

But I’m not surprised.

And this bile continues throughout the other 8 Titles, which do nothing but pander to women- whilst targeting men.

Further reading:

Titles of VAWA


The Infanticide Act

Feminists say: Mothers may act out of desperation to kill their newborns.

Fred X says: You’ve got your abortion legalised already cunt, and now you get to kill your kids after they are born.

Short quotes from Wiki:

“The Infanticide Act effectively abolished the death penalty for a woman who deliberately killed her new born child while the balance of her mind was disturbed as a result of giving birth, by providing a partial defence to murder.”

And

“In recent years it has become very rare for a mother who kills her infant child to receive a custodial sentence, save in very exceptional circumstances.”

Source: Wikipedia- Infanticide Act

Now- if men ever harmed their children- they would not only be demonised, but jailed too.

Women get neither.

In fact- quite the opposite.

So if you think women aren't given special treatment- think again.

It seems they can murder children when they are born OR unborn doesn't it.

Further reading:

Irish Statute

Swarb- Infanticide Act

---

So, there you have it- various areas where feminists have lied and where women are favoured and/or given special treatment, whereas men are not.

So if you see me referring to such things in the short hand- and you dare tell me I have made all this up- I’ll be directing you to 2 things:

1) This article

And

2) My arsehole- for any further queries you may have

This piece is for all you fuckers out there who think MRA’s don’t have grounds for complaint- and you can kiss my arse.

--

PS- Get fucked.

More...