There were two men who came up with wikipedia in the beginning; but one wanted to let only real professionals enter data, and the other wanted everyone to be able to. The second man created wikipedia, but what did the former guy make? I used to know this. Any help as to what it is?

It does seem very rough and ready in these areas and far from accurate.. Matt O connor of f4j was famously recorded in there as being the gay father of 10 sons..

Quote from Marx

This means someone high up the ranks on Wikipedia is abusing their access to ensure a more level-headed detail cannot be given on the anti-feminist page at wikipedia.

yes they have. those entries have been made by special working groups that have been granted with administrative rights
If you look in the talk page

"This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks."

Wikipedia is alla about donations....

Quote from Fabrizio Napoleoni

Wikipedia is alla about donations....

More sickening is that most feminist organisations' funding comes from the taxpayer .. the majority of whom are the very males that feminism hurts most.

Quote from Fabrizio Napoleoni

yes they have. those entries have been made by special working groups that have been granted with administrative rights
If you look in the talk page

"This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks."

Wikipedia is alla about donations....

Jesus fucked, can you please refrain from linking to obscene material, even if it is necessary to prove a point.. I feel very ill now, going to have to lie down for a while after accidently clicking onto to feminist toxin links..

Quote from Marx

Right... but this entry deletion wasn't an edit - the changes Douglas made have been wiped from existence. Meaning, an admin or moderator (or similar high-level access) has made the changes.

Changes by ordinary folk, like you or I, are reflected in a change-log.. the change-log doesn't reflect Douglas' edits, so they've been erased completely - so no one can ever click on the changes he made and see them... they simply don't exist.

This means someone high up the ranks on Wikipedia is abusing their access to ensure a more level-headed detail cannot be given on the anti-feminist page at wikipedia.

Probably a liberal, since the majority of media are liberals and probably will be feminist. Antifeminism is a growing movement and a threat to their system, so they will do what it takes. Someone may have come alone and disputed the changes too. Perhaps try to write it again and see what happens?

Feminists adopt similar tactics to Marxist guerrillas in demonizing it's enemy. Whenever the opposition returns fire after being fired upon first, they cowardly run into the households of the general population, which they previously found contemptible, and say "see, do you see how they attack us comrade."

As the true nature of feminism becomes increasingly unraveled by an informed population, so in turn comes a more desperate reliance on agitprop and controlling definitions/language within the media.

Making a clear discernment between women generally who constitute the majority, and feminists who are a numerical anomaly, is not only imperative in conveying to the uninformed, but makes it easier to isolate and eradicate the pathogen more efficiently.

I guess my equal revulsion at male feminists must make me a misandrist?