How does killing a child compare in anyway to some sad fucker being unable to get wood to satisfy his ugly wife/dog/blow up doll..

Yup,
It's jobs for the gurls.
Just like there is a sexual abuse industry, there is also the anti-violence industry and now we need to keep feckless women that went to uni to study wimmins rights, in a socialist junket, to tell men how their lives should be run.

To put it bluntly, any man that takes these drugs is fooling himself, if you and your partner can't work together and sort this situation out, that is just hopeless.
Either you haven't got the balls to talk it over with your partner or she just doesn't care, both of you deserve to be alone.

Let's get one thing straight here, this sort of thing is mis-andric in itself, as in the need for a man to take potentially dangerous drugs, so that SHE gets the benefit of them drugs.
It is the feminist idea that wimmin need so many orgasms and if a MAN can't give them to her, he is a loser.
How many times have you heard a woman say "Oh but the sex wasn't that great!", in comparison to what?

What, I ask you?
Was it HER expectations, or was it the female-led media telling her she should expect X number of orgasms a night?

Quote from felixblue

How does killing a child compare in anyway to some sad fucker being unable to get wood to satisfy his ugly wife/dog/blow up doll..

It doesn't!
The sad shit sack who introduced the bill did it specifically to attack men.

“the patient’s symptoms are not solely attributable to one or more psychological conditions.”

Ya, PDS.

Post Divorce Syndrome.

Nina Turner is a feminist pig.

Did U also see this quote..

Senator Janet Howell sought an amendment requiring doctors to perform a rectal exam and stress test before prescribing erectile-dysfunction drugs.“I think we should just have a little gender equity here,”

She said she modeled her bill in response to attempted abortion restrictions by Republicans.

Nina Turner, Howell and other feminist pigs are simply trying to pass laws which will cause men the most discomfort and grief. Men in these states need to be made aware of the female chauvinist pigs whom are currently their State Senators.

Someone needs to take her to task. She's either being intentionally deceptive, or she fails basic biology, or both. This bill is not even close to being equal. An equivalent bill would be that men need therapist OK in order to kill his fetus, but for that to happen, men would have to be given reproductive rights, and there's no way feminists would allow men to have rights comparable to women.

Also, let's see the "WAR ON MEN" backlash against her bill.

Nina Turner, I'd like you to meet Gloria Allred, Sandra Fluke, Bill Maher, Ed Schultz, Rhandi Rhodes, et al. I think y'all will get along great!

Quote from MikeT

Yup,
It's jobs for the gurls.
Just like there is a sexual abuse industry, there is also the anti-violence industry and now we need to keep feckless women that went to uni to study wimmins rights, in a socialist junket, to tell men how their lives should be run.

To put it bluntly, any man that takes these drugs is fooling himself, if you and your partner can't work together and sort this situation out, that is just hopeless.
Either you haven't got the balls to talk it over with your partner or she just doesn't care, both of you deserve to be alone.

Let's get one thing straight here, this sort of thing is mis-andric in itself, as in the need for a man to take potentially dangerous drugs, so that SHE gets the benefit of them drugs.
It is the feminist idea that wimmin need so many orgasms and if a MAN can't give them to her, he is a loser.
How many times have you heard a woman say "Oh but the sex wasn't that great!", in comparison to what?

What, I ask you?
Was it HER expectations, or was it the female-led media telling her she should expect X number of orgasms a night?

You need to learn about what you're talking about before speaking. I don't take these meds for anyone but myself. ED is NOT a psychological problem or caused by a sexual partner's lack of skill. I would take these meds even if I had no contact with another human being. They allow the possibility of sexual release that is otherwise impossible. That relieves stress. They are not particularly dangerous. They are not for _her_ benefit. A guy could use his finger of that's all it were. The worst thing about these drugs is they work reasonably well, and that discourages doctors from looking too hard for the cause of the problem. They are, however, a hell of a lot better than nothing. For ME!